Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
bovril

Unpopular Opinions You Hold

Recommended Posts

The thing about voting perhaps should be linked to human rights? We don’t allow prisoners to vote on the basis of being out of society and not having citizenship status but there’s a part of me which disagrees with that. I’m all for people being allowed to vote at a younger age as well - it might serve to ensure that potential governments consider the more vulnerable in society in their policy design inclusive of teenagers and prisoners... might have an impact on such things as knife crime and reoffending rates if these demographics had a vote.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Swan Lesta said:

The thing about voting perhaps should be linked to human rights? We don’t allow prisoners to vote on the basis of being out of society and not having citizenship status but there’s a part of me which disagrees with that. I’m all for people being allowed to vote at a younger age as well - it might serve to ensure that potential governments consider the more vulnerable in society in their policy design inclusive of teenagers and prisoners... might have an impact on such things as knife crime and reoffending rates if these demographics had a vote.

Certainly if you can work, pay tax, marry and join the army (all of which you can, in theory, at 16), you should be able to vote. I can also see the benefit in allowing certain prisoners to vote, such as those coming to the end of long sentences or serving short ones. Anything that can help people feel like they're part of the society that has punished them for their crimes has to be a good thing in terms of stopping repeat behaviour.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest MattP
16 minutes ago, Voll Blau said:

Certainly if you can work, pay tax, marry and join the army (all of which you can, in theory, at 16), you should be able to vote. I can also see the benefit in allowing certain prisoners to vote, such as those coming to the end of long sentences or serving short ones. Anything that can help people feel like they're part of the society that has punished them for their crimes has to be a good thing in terms of stopping repeat behaviour.

You can work at pay tax at any age. You can marry with parental consent at 16. You can't be sent to a war zone at 16.

 

If they can vote at that age then just make adulthood at 16 - I see voting as a huge responsibility, arguably the biggest civil duty you undertake.

 

I'm fine with it providing they can then also do everything else at that age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MattP said:

Interesting that Irish citizens can vote in a British election. I didn't know that.

 

I had to check, but it works both ways apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland#Eligibility_to_vote

So, Brits resident in Ireland can vote in Irish parliamentary elections, whereas resident EU citizens cannot. Brits cannot vote in Irish Presidential elections - but then Irish in the UK don't get to vote for/against the Queen. 

I think Irish in the UK got to vote in the Brexit referendum, didn't they? If so, there's a disparity there.

 

Historical complications would arise if this arrangement didn't apply. My Dad was born in the Irish Free State, never took out dual British citizenship (though he considered it) and always voted in UK elections.

But he had an elder brother and sister who also lived long-term in England, and they were both born when the whole of Ireland was still in the UK - and his sister only died in 2011.

There will still be a handful of people around who were born in what is now the Irish Republic, but was then part of the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This "concession" that May is offering on workers' rights seems pretty meaningless.

 

As I understand it, in future if the EU changed its legislation on workers' rights, the UK parliament would automatically look at whether to follow suit.

But, firstly, any future parliament could opt to do that anyway. Secondly, any future parliament could look at the new EU laws and choose to ignore them, and increase working hours, reduce H&S, get rid of parental leave or whatever (or use our national independence to improve such measures to a level higher than EU standards :whistle:).

 

I see that Frances O'Grady has rejected this "concession" out of hand and she's no Hard Left extremist.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest MattP
1 hour ago, Alf Bentley said:

 

I had to check, but it works both ways apparently: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland#Eligibility_to_vote

So, Brits resident in Ireland can vote in Irish parliamentary elections, whereas resident EU citizens cannot. Brits cannot vote in Irish Presidential elections - but then Irish in the UK don't get to vote for/against the Queen. 

I think Irish in the UK got to vote in the Brexit referendum, didn't they? If so, there's a disparity there.

 

Historical complications would arise if this arrangement didn't apply. My Dad was born in the Irish Free State, never took out dual British citizenship (though he considered it) and always voted in UK elections.

But he had an elder brother and sister who also lived long-term in England, and they were both born when the whole of Ireland was still in the UK - and his sister only died in 2011.

There will still be a handful of people around who were born in what is now the Irish Republic, but was then part of the UK.

Does make sense.

 

My Grandpa was born in Ireland whilst it was still part of the United Kingdom - unfortunately I never got to talk politics with him as he died when I was eleven but my Mother tells me he loved Tony Benn so it would have been interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Footballwipe said:

Those openly dismissing the latest round of Michael Jackson allegations are essentially condoning sexual abuse.

 

I'm sorry, I genuinely worry about the mental state of people who are defending him; they're utterly bizarre and absolute double-standard hypocrites.

His fans are an extremely strange breed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Footballwipe said:

Those openly dismissing the latest round of Michael Jackson allegations are essentially condoning sexual abuse.

 

I'm sorry, I genuinely worry about the mental state of people who are defending him; they're utterly bizarre and absolute double-standard hypocrites.

 

23 minutes ago, RonnieTodger said:

His fans are an extremely strange breed

Denial in such and other matters is sadly not such a rare phenomenon.

 

Anti-vaxxers and those willing to ignore the effects of climate change because it suits them at the present time come to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, DennisNedry said:

Anybody caught with a knife should receive an automatic 6 month prison sentence. Repeat offenders, 5 years.

 

What about people who have a legitimate reason for having one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buce said:

 

What about people who have a legitimate reason for having one?

Think if you just bought one from a shop and it's in its packaging you're fine. I'm struggling to think of another reason you'd be walking a city street with an unpackaged knife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Facecloth said:

Think if you just bought one from a shop and it's in its packaging you're fine. I'm struggling to think of another reason you'd be walking a city street with an unpackaged knife.

 

Well, city streets weren't mentioned, just a blanket ban on possession of knives.

 

Loads of tradesmen have legitimate reasons for carrying one, as does anyone who is hiking/camping - I carry one routinely when I go on overnight hiking trips.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buce said:

 

Well, city streets weren't mentioned, just a blanket ban on possession of knives.

 

Loads of tradesmen have legitimate reasons for carrying one, as does anyone who is hiking/camping - I carry one routinely when I go on overnight hiking trips.

Guess I was just assuming about the streets. Its where the problem is. Obviously there has to be some allowances, but if you're just walking through a city street with one and you're clearly not using it for work it's should carry a charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Facecloth said:

Guess I was just assuming about the streets. Its where the problem is. Obviously there has to be some allowances, but if you're just walking through a city street with one and you're clearly not using it for work it's should carry a charge.

 

 

I agree, but I was referring to the ill-thought-out kneejerk post before yours.

 

Blanket bans are rarely just or necessary.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Buce said:

 

 

Blanket bans are rarely just or necessary.

 

 

 

I never understood them. On cold nights they are a godsend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...