southfox66 Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Isn't much better, hopefully we get someone before weekend
somebum Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 I said at his appointment it would turn sour fast. But because he looks pretty with his flowery tatts this place thought the whole thing was some kind of dream team.
st albans fox Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 unless they have evidence that Appleton was suggesting stuff that shakey wasn't taking on board then I don't see the point in firing shakey and putting Appleton in control. guess we will see from the tactics employed on Saturday
lifted*fox Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 All of our players will walk out at Swansea all ****ing tanked up like bodybuilders, barely able to run and just spend 90 minutes drinking protein shakes and asking each other if they even lift bro.
TheUltimateWinner Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Even if we won every game under him I don't think the owners will make a caretaker manager permanent again...
FrankieADZ Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 id be surprised if he got the job full time, be interesting to see if he changes the formation or anything for Saturday, hopefully we'll see something different to 442 though knowing LCFC we wont appoint a new manager until after the Stoke game when there is an international break
Jimmy Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 think I might have preferred Beaglehole to be caretaker with a total clear out
The Doctor Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Just please don't fall for the new manager bounce and make it permanent...
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Owners won't make same mistake twice even if Appleton does well. Interesting to see if he stays at the club after new appointment
m4DD0gg Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 God knows how this meat head got the gig in the first place. Can imagine the players have zero respect for him.
norwichfox Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Appleton should've gone too....wtf is he still doing here?
Stevosevic Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Not sure what motivation he would have to prepare the team for Saturday? He knows he's out of a job.
Jimmy Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Just now, Stevosevic said: Not sure what motivation he would have to prepare the team for Saturday? He knows he's out of a job. help his CV for after
foxfanazer Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Hope this doesn’t last long. Players will be getting sent off for roid rage
HankMarvin Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Wonder if he snaked his old mate CS and was giving rudders inside info
Jimothy Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 Assistant taking over temporarily from sacked manager shocker. Wtf are you whinging about, this nearly always happens. The problems start if we put him in charge full time.
Dr The Singh Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 I wish they made teflon man, Rudkin the boss, then finally we can get rid of him.
EnglishOxide Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 23 minutes ago, st albans fox said: unless they have evidence that Appleton was suggesting stuff that shakey wasn't taking on board then I don't see the point in firing shakey and putting Appleton in control. guess we will see from the tactics employed on Saturday Just watching a re-run of last night's game and there was a scene where Shakespeare went over for Appleton's advice in the first half and he looked pretty pissed off, animated and waving his hands about whilst Shakespeare had a look on his face as though he was non plussed. I suppose the context has changed a bit with today's news in that it makes you wonder if they had differing views on how to get the team going.
Jimmy Posted 17 October 2017 Posted 17 October 2017 1 minute ago, davieG said: Bet he's glad he left Oxford I bet he is when he looks at his bank balance
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.