StanSP Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 14 minutes ago, Walkers said: Had someone pulled another player back 40 yards from goal but they go on to score anyway he'd have been booked afterwards. This is a straight red offence but advantage was played and a goal scored, so why should that mean we just pretend it never happened? 11 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said: I've often thought it might be a good idea to allow the attacking team the choice to decide whether they want the goal, or whether they want the penalty and the red card for the defender. Should have been booked even after the goal scored.
Guest ttfn Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 2 minutes ago, StanSP said: Should have been booked even after the goal scored. I’m 99% sure the ref didn’t see it. Just as well Newcastle did score!
CollinsLCFC Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 1 minute ago, Nickfosse said: Problem as ever is, why would he turn down a potential permanent signing to Newcastle and start every week as their number 9 to be back up to Vardy. Ambitious owners. Targeting Europe rather than a PL status. Working with an exciting, young, talented squad. Healthy competition.
HybridFox Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 8 minutes ago, Paddy. said: Could still go in for him. He's only on loan at Newcastle. Send them Iheanacho as a sweetener
Suzie the Fox Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 1 minute ago, Livid said: Newcastle are 8-1 on Hills Was similar on Bet365 17/2 when i bet pre KO.
Nickfosse Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 1 minute ago, CollinsLCFC said: Ambitious owners. Targeting Europe rather than a PL status. Working with an exciting, young, talented squad. Healthy competition. I understand all that mate, but don’t underestimate how much players want to play.
Livid Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 1 minute ago, Suzie the Fox said: Was similar on Bet365 17/2 when i bet pre KO. Just had a couple of quid. 2-2, home team, 30 minutes to go 8-1 seemed generous.
trabuch Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 1 minute ago, Livid said: Just had a couple of quid. 2-2, home team, 30 minutes to go 8-1 seemed generous. Particularly with Salah off.
Brainy Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 9 minutes ago, StanSP said: Should have been booked even after the goal scored. It is a red card offence. Why should a goal being scored/not scored mean a different card colour?
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 Just now, Livid said: Going to be a bit of injury time! All set up for a Liverpool winner in the 8th minute of added time.
Izzy Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 Put 1-1 on the Superbru predictor for this. Just had a feeling Newcastle might get a point. All this falling over is doing my tits in though.
StanSP Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 9 minutes ago, Walkers said: It is a red card offence. Why should a goal being scored/not scored mean a different card colour? It's not. It's literally in the laws of the game that he gets booked if there's continues to be a goal scored after the handball. (see the post above yours I made). If there was no goal scored as a result of the handball on the line (like Suarez in 2010 World Cup) then it's a red card.
StanSP Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 Definitely gonna be a dodgy Liverpool penalty in injury time...
Vacamion Posted 4 May 2019 Posted 4 May 2019 2 minutes ago, Vacamion said: I reckon 8 additional minutes. Make that 3.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.