Jattdogg Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 Tell you what, if chelsea really dont want kante (as their manager has spoken ill will on him) id tske them bith back. Bring sweet prince back, huth and lets do it all over again.
MPH Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 1 hour ago, Goober said: I doubt anyone of them would actually care too much, never mind hold a grudge. They’re all big boys so you think it’s always love and hugs in the dressing room? i can assure you it’s not. people fall out and disagree with each other all the time. it’s just like any other work place environment.
STUHILL Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 I was against this back in the Summer, as I genuinely thought Silva would be a step-up in quality. That obviously hasn't happened and I don't see it happening now either. We really need a dynamic CM with a bit of everything, and Drinkwater was that for us before. Question is, can he rediscover that and is he good enough in our new Puel system? Also, how motivated would he be coming back to the club he left for bigger and better things, having failed...? Add that to his injury record and what sitting on his arse for 18 months may have done for his confidence... and there are just too many question marks for this to make sense on paper. I think there are better options out there, but I could be swayed to take a punt if it was a loan deal with Chelski contributing to his wages. If he comes straight back in with a genuine hunger/desire to revive his career, then he could be just the player we need for 6 months. Otherwise - we send him back and just live with the memories of him once being great for us! I'd prefer we target CM's with more culture and creative flair, but Drinkwater shouldn't be completely ruled out as a 6 month loan option. At 28, there is still a good player in there, but I agree with other people's doubts and so a short-term loan i.e trial, should be the only genuine option for us.
desertfox2 Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 He's not going to be match fit due to his lack of games so will likely come back worse. He moved on, so should we. We are in desperate need of goals in the side since Mahrez left i'd prefer we focused on that. 2 goal scoring wingers and another option up top. We have other priorities.
TheSomersetFox Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 23 minutes ago, MPH said: so you think it’s always love and hugs in the dressing room? i can assure you it’s not. people fall out and disagree with each other all the time. it’s just like any other work place environment. Well considering Drinkwater was one of the most well-liked members of the dressing room - which is famously close-knit - I’d suggest you’re very wrong in this instance.
moore_94 Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 Can see him staying in London and joining one of West Ham, Palace or Fulham on loan in January
bald reynard Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 2 hours ago, moore_94 said: Can see him staying in London and joining one of West Ham, Palace or Fulham on loan in January Claudio WILL be in for him. And it will be a Loan.
Jattdogg Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 1 hour ago, bald reynard said: Claudio WILL be in for him. And it will be a Loan. Agree on this
Abs-Fox Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 4 minutes ago, Jattdogg said: Agree on this Me 2 !
VLC86 Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 4 hours ago, desertfox2 said: He's not going to be match fit due to his lack of games so will likely come back worse. He moved on, so should we. We are in desperate need of goals in the side since Mahrez left i'd prefer we focused on that. 2 goal scoring wingers and another option up top. We have other priorities. If you are expecting 2 goal scoring wingers and another striker prepare to be disappointed.
Max Wall Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 If he's going anywhere, I'd be surprised if it isn't Fulham now.
JamesWelshFox Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 Still think there might be a role for him here, would take him back but would he come especially as we couldn't guarantee him he would be in the starting 11 ? If he came with the right mindset though I think he could earn that place. I'd take a chance on him.
Langston Posted 11 December 2018 Posted 11 December 2018 Grown men calling him Benchwarmer, this is why I love football.
Gamble92 Posted 14 December 2018 Posted 14 December 2018 On 11/12/2018 at 21:57, Langston said: Grown men calling him Benchwarmer, this is why I love football. Good nickname but he would have to make the bench first for it to be applicable
sylofox Posted 14 December 2018 Posted 14 December 2018 On 11/12/2018 at 21:57, Langston said: Grown men calling him Benchwarmer, this is why I love football. Yeah but they all have a premier league title medal and earn £100k a week
Bunyip Posted 14 December 2018 Posted 14 December 2018 Grown men repeating it, It's why I love Foxtalk.
SB87_LCFC Posted 14 December 2018 Posted 14 December 2018 I cannot see a return here being an option for Drinky imo, I seem to recall he refused to train because we wouldn't sell him to Chelsea, which if memory serves me right meant we made a last ditch move for Adrien Silva and were without a CM until the following January (all for 14-15 seconds or whatever it was). I think if he is making a move in January he'll more than likely link up with Claudio at Fulham. I think the Sky Sports link to a return is idle journalism. Great servant to the club when his heart was in it, but I cant see a return being a positive move for either him or the club. I agree with a lot of people we need a ball player in the midfield to be that connection to the final third.
Suzie the Fox Posted 14 December 2018 Posted 14 December 2018 Not sure its a good message the club would be giving out, if they were to take him back. 'Its ok guys, if a big club comes in for you and you decide to leave, if it doesn't work out you can always come back'
reynard Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 16 hours ago, Suzie the Fox said: Not sure its a good message the club would be giving out, if they were to take him back. 'Its ok guys, if a big club comes in for you and you decide to leave, if it doesn't work out you can always come back' There's a lot in this. Also the shining example of how the grass isn't always greener. Had he stayed at Leicester would he have got more England calls? He certainly would have at least played. Must be questions over his fitness. Shame was a very decent player for us.
VLC86 Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 18 hours ago, Suzie the Fox said: Not sure its a good message the club would be giving out, if they were to take him back. 'Its ok guys, if a big club comes in for you and you decide to leave, if it doesn't work out you can always come back' Football doesn’t mirror normal society though and if it is beneficial I think that would be irrelevant. There are plenty of examples of things like this happening. With Puel in charge I do think it’s unlikely unless Drinky takes a pay cut and financially it works for us.
sylofox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 19 hours ago, Suzie the Fox said: Not sure its a good message the club would be giving out, if they were to take him back. 'Its ok guys, if a big club comes in for you and you decide to leave, if it doesn't work out you can always come back' I do agree but this is football. Nigel your sacked. Hey Nigel want to go work in Belgium. Jose your sacked. Jose will you come back. Let's be honest if clubs or owners can re employ a sacked manager a player is nothing.
Suzie the Fox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 1 hour ago, Costock_Fox said: Football doesn’t mirror normal society though and if it is beneficial I think that would be irrelevant. There are plenty of examples of things like this happening. With Puel in charge I do think it’s unlikely unless Drinky takes a pay cut and financially it works for us. 1 hour ago, sylofox said: I do agree but this is football. Nigel your sacked. Hey Nigel want to go work in Belgium. Jose your sacked. Jose will you come back. Let's be honest if clubs or owners can re employ a sacked manager a player is nothing. Aye you guys might be right. I have no clue tbh, was just a random thought i was putting out there.
sylofox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 34 minutes ago, Suzie the Fox said: I have no clue Is this a woman thing We had time to think about it and in the real world your right. Anyway what sense does Football make 1,2,or £300k a week explains it all really.
Wymsey Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 What a waste of a year that he has had. Could've easily requested a loan etc, if he was really desperate to play more first-team football elsewhere. Hence, his stock has fallen due to his lack of insight of whether to go to Chelsea or not.
SheppyFox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 Old out of shape injured ruin, no thanks Danny, you’ve made your bed
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.