Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
33 minutes ago, Vlad the Fox said:

Mills is one of the worst. I listened to the 5live commentary when we beat chelsea at Stamford bridge last season and he didn’t have a clue about us. If a chelsea attack broke down he’d go on about what the chelsea forwards had done wrong, if we had a good attack he’d talk about what the chelsea defence had done wrong, his whole perspective and focus was chelsea, until about the 88th minute when he said we’d played well. Things like this don’t usually annoy me but it was so obvious and as a result really poor one sided commentary. 

 

Its amazing that that they get away with it, any other journalist in any other field who did as little research in there supposed field of expertise and showed such a basic lack of knowledge would get no where, ye5 because they are ex pros there treated as though they’re the all knowing oracle by media outlets. I don’t mind controversial opinions or different interpretations but to know do basic research on what you are expected to be knowledgable on is just laziness an arrogant.

Agreed. 

 

The standard of opinion of a lot of ex pros is ****ing diabolical. Mills is useless and his colleagues ought to be having a quiet word. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jaspa said:

In love with Ngolo

 

Staggers me he's still at Chelsea and that PSG, Barca or Real haven't given the moon for him. Best defensive midfielder in the world

 

 

 

They couldn't afford both of the twins. 

 

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jaspa said:

In love with Ngolo

 

Staggers me he's still at Chelsea and that PSG, Barca or Real haven't given the moon for him. Best defensive midfielder in the world

 

 

no reason to go PSG. unless he wanted to go back to france.

Posted

S1e25_Big-eyed_Finn_blushing.png

 

Praise the footballing gods: extra time! There's not some first goal wins it bullshit, is there? I want two 15 minute halves of extra time on a poor pitch in exhausting weather with the kind of emotionally helplessness that takes years of therapy to remove. And then I want penalties and ideally lots of penalties so many penalties the officials have to check the rulebook for an upper limit, and I want to see actual tears of exhaustion from the players, some of them openly praying for an end to it all. And maybe an injury. But I'm not a greedy man.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Foxxed said:

S1e25_Big-eyed_Finn_blushing.png

 

Praise the footballing gods: extra time! There's not some first goal wins it bullshit, is there? I want two 15 minute halves of extra time on a poor pitch in exhausting weather with the kind of emotionally helplessness that takes years of therapy to remove. And then I want penalties and ideally lots of penalties so many penalties the officials have to check the rulebook for an upper limit, and I want to see actual tears of exhaustion from the players, some of them openly praying for an end to it all. And maybe an injury. But I'm not a greedy man.

Only ONE injury?.. 

You softy. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Foxxed said:

S1e25_Big-eyed_Finn_blushing.png

 

Praise the footballing gods: extra time! There's not some first goal wins it bullshit, is there? I want two 15 minute halves of extra time on a poor pitch in exhausting weather with the kind of emotionally helplessness that takes years of therapy to remove. And then I want penalties and ideally lots of penalties so many penalties the officials have to check the rulebook for an upper limit, and I want to see actual tears of exhaustion from the players, some of them openly praying for an end to it all. And maybe an injury. But I'm not a greedy man.

Yes, I’d enjoy an 87-86 penalty shootout win for one of them. 

Posted (edited)

I know it’s assisted us with the Chelsea but find  it bizarre Liverpool will be playing again on Saturday, 3pm. Surely would have made sense for the Chelsea and Liverpool games being both Sunday.

 

Similarly I’m not sure if Wolves will be happy playing Monday night to then play Thursday in Turin. Their players will literally have recovery Tuesday and then off on a plane for Wednesday. With Wolves having their home

leg on Thursday, a Sunday afternoon kick off makes.

Edited by Cardiff_Fox
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Cardiff_Fox said:

I know it’s assisted us with the Chelsea but find  it bizarre Liverpool will be playing again on Saturday, 3pm. Surely would have made sense for the Chelsea and Liverpool games being both Sunday.

 

Similarly I’m not sure if Wolves will be happy playing Monday night to then play Thursday in Turin. Their players will literally have recovery Tuesday and then off on a plane for Wednesday. With Wolves having their home

leg on Thursday, a Sunday afternoon kick off makes.

Bonkers isn't it? 

 

Then you take into account that Liverpool played Friday night and Chelsea played Sunday afternoon. 

 

Stupid organisation of games 

Would it have hurt to have moved Chelsea to Saturday last week , and have both Liverpool and Chelsea on Sunday? 

Same with Wolves, why not play it on Saturday and give them rest for Europe? 

 

We really do have a strange league 

Posted

Did VAR really not overrule the penalty decision because its a female referee? 

 

That isn't a penalty. Didn't touch the player. 

 

Male or female, an incorrect decision is an incorrect decision and VAR is there to be used. 

  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, CollinsLCFC said:

Did VAR really not overrule the penalty decision because its a female referee? 

 

That isn't a penalty. Didn't touch the player. 

 

Male or female, an incorrect decision is an incorrect decision and VAR is there to be used. 

The view was it wasn’t a clear or obvious error ......I would have preferred to var official to ask her to review it and confirm she still felt it was a pen 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CollinsLCFC said:

Did VAR really not overrule the penalty decision because its a female referee? 

 

That isn't a penalty. Didn't touch the player. 

 

Male or female, an incorrect decision is an incorrect decision and VAR is there to be used. 

The gender of the ref had 0 to do with that VAR call. 

  • Like 4
Posted

Never a penalty from those views. was there not a camera view from the other side?

Posted
1 minute ago, UniFox21 said:

Bonkers isn't it? 

 

Then you take into account that Liverpool played Friday night and Chelsea played Sunday afternoon. 

 

Stupid organisation of games 

Would it have hurt to have moved Chelsea to Saturday last week , and have both Liverpool and Chelsea on Sunday? 

Same with Wolves, why not play it on Saturday and give them rest for Europe? 

 

We really do have a strange league 

I just think it badly skews the results - it’s not fair on everyone if some teams are playing opponents on nine days rest whilst others are playing them on say five days rest. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...