Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
KingsX

Striker or Winger?

Striker or Winger?  

172 members have voted

  1. 1. (after Tielemans) What’s the highest priority addition?



Recommended Posts

Posted

I would of said striker however nearly created a war against my self when this was suggested hahaha.

 

We need a striker but equally need a winger but the winger would have to be of the standard of Ziyech 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Wolfox said:

Both

 

One minute in, and it's banjaxed  :facepalm:

 

There are hard choices in life you know!  :P

Posted

Winger. Iheanacho is just profoundly low on confidence. I believe there’s still a good player there and I think Brendan can find it. Same with Gray, though we do need a top quality winger to come in and perform straight away. 

Posted

The age old "problem" is that we play one central striker with support from the wide players and Maddison behind, so any specialist centre forward is unlikely to get many or any starts. However when we are behind and chasing a game and decide to go with two down the middle it would help to have someone capable of making a significant contribution. A better option could be to put Gray, Barnes or Maddison in there, more central, and have a new wide player in their place for those 20-25 minutes or so, just to get an extra body closer to goal.

 

The huge problem would come if Vardy misses games through injury or suspension. If he pulled a hamstring v Wolves after the window's shut we'd have Nacho and (presuming Slimani has gone) no option(s) on the bench. Unless one of the U-23's steps up big time we need at least one more CF on the books considering we're losing Shinji and probably Slimani. Someone who can do both like our old friend Kramaric would therefore be ideal but he'd expect to start.

 

So my cheat-y answer is someone who can do both, who has more chance of playing wide but has a bit more CF than winger about them. Kram'imin!

 

Posted

Quality winger in and hopefully Rodgers can get Iheanacho his spark back, depending on the Tielemans situation we could still need an attacking central midfield player... 

Guest SO1
Posted

A player with the technical ability to do both.

Posted

We desperately need an alternative source of goals, whether that's from the wing or striker I really don't care.


I fear if Vardy were to be injured then we really have 0 attacking threat!

Posted
1 hour ago, Countryfox said:

 

82% say winger as i post ...  think we all seem to agree ...   :thumbup:

Logically if 82% vote in one direction then the remaining 18% must disagree, given that we don't have a "Don't Know".

 

BTW I disagree and voted Centre Forward, since we only have one who can score goals

Posted

Winger 100%. backup striker will start very few games, whilst a winger would go straight in over Gray. 

 

Barnes is good for left wing, but an upgrade on Gray would have a big effect imo 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...