Ian Nacho Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 I’ve never understood why some clubs insist on upping the price because the player has a sell on clause. If the selling club agreed to putting the clause in there, why on earth should the buying club pay for it? 2
Raw Dykes Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 7 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said: I’ve never understood why some clubs insist on upping the price because the player has a sell on clause. If the selling club agreed to putting the clause in there, why on earth should the buying club pay for it? The selling club gets to set whatever price they want to, but I agree - they shouldn't expect anyone to pay for them agreeing to something they wish they hadn't. 1
Popular Post Finnegan Posted 27 September 2020 Popular Post Posted 27 September 2020 2 hours ago, Costock_Fox said: I don’t know, is he a little bit err foreign for Dyche? His name is literally Islam, I'm not sure they Burnley White Lives Matter crew could cope 7
Adster Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 Steve Cook. The most 'Burnley' signing ever 1 2
peach0000 Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 1 minute ago, Adster said: Steve Cook. The most 'Burnley' signing ever I'd argue that Dawson would be more so 2
dannythefox Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 We’ll get this done then there’s a decent chance we’ll start seeing 3 at the back more 👌🏻
Ian Nacho Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 17 minutes ago, Adster said: Steve Cook. The most 'Burnley' signing ever Dale Stephens is a more Burnley signing
GlenParvaFox Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 13 minutes ago, Adster said: Steve Cook. The most 'Burnley' signing ever They had Dale Stephens playing for them yesterday and I thought, yep that makes sense.
Raw Dykes Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 25 minutes ago, dannythefox said: We’ll get this done then there’s a decent chance we’ll start seeing 3 at the back more 👌🏻 Just curious - is that something you want to see? I'm more interested in seeing Barnes, Vardy and Under terrorising defences as a front 3. 4
VLC86 Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 38 minutes ago, Finnegan said: His name is literally Islam, I'm not sure they Burnley White Lives Matter crew could cope That’s what I mean. I stopped short of calling Dyche a huge racist because there is no evidence for that of course.
Dahnsouff Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 6 minutes ago, Raw Dykes said: Just curious - is that something you want to see? I'm more interested in seeing Barnes, Vardy and Under terrorising defences as a front 3. Will Under be playing today? Seems unlikely no?
Walshy5 Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 If we were to sign him then there would be massive pressure on Rodgers to start him every game due to the large fee. Who do you drop out of Evans and Soyuncu? And I can't see us going to a back 3 on a regular basis with the signing of Under. Put all our efforts into Tah I say. 1
Guest Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 2 hours ago, Costock_Fox said: I don’t know, is he a little bit err foreign for Dyche? Almost certainly yeah. They're like Bilbao but instead of only signing Basque players they exclusively target 6ft+ white Brits 1
rachhere Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 3 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Will Under be playing today? Seems unlikely no? He shared on photo on social media yesterday of him on a runway, so I am guessing he's only just arriving into the UK? 1
st albans fox Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Will Under be playing today? Seems unlikely no? It’s not unlikely - he isn’t he only arrived in the U.K. yesterday and his clearance wouldn’t have come through before noon on Friday 48 minutes ago, Raw Dykes said: The selling club gets to set whatever price they want to, but I agree - they shouldn't expect anyone to pay for them agreeing to something they wish they hadn't. We didn’t get what we wanted for chilwell ....... ‘events dear boy, events’ ....... Edited 27 September 2020 by st albans fox 1
Mark Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 40 minutes ago, dannythefox said: We’ll get this done then there’s a decent chance we’ll start seeing 3 at the back more 👌🏻 Sound horrific. 2
MPH Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 2 minutes ago, Walshy5 said: If we were to sign him then there would be massive pressure on Rodgers to start him every game due to the large fee. Who do you drop out of Evans and Soyuncu? And I can't see us going to a back 3 on a regular basis with the signing of Under. Put all our efforts into Tah I say. You don’t drop either. you play 3 at the back.
Scotch Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 3 minutes ago, MPH said: You don’t drop either. you play 3 at the back. So how you going up top the? Barnes and Under as inverted wingers meaning you'll have to drop Maddison/Tielemans or Ndidi (when fit) or are you going with two strikers in which case Under is on the bench and Barnes is either with him or playing up top?
MPH Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Foxy_Bear said: So how you going up top the? Barnes and Under as inverted wingers meaning you'll have to drop Maddison/Tielemans or Ndidi (when fit) or are you going with two strikers in which case Under is on the bench and Barnes is either with him or playing up top? i basically just meant we’ll be playing a few different formations to fit the needs of more games we will be playing. plus, we might start 3 at the back and switch half way through. Or the other way round.. Edited 27 September 2020 by MPH 1
Guest Fktf Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 1 hour ago, Ian Nacho said: I’ve never understood why some clubs insist on upping the price because the player has a sell on clause. If the selling club agreed to putting the clause in there, why on earth should the buying club pay for it? Basic business. Always pass as much cost on to someone else in the chain to protect your own margin.
Raw Dykes Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 We're desperate for cover as it is with just 2 centre-halves in the team. If we switch to 3 at the back, we'll want another 2 in the squad, and at least one of Barnes and Under will be left on the bench. Although it looks like we're spending big on a CB, I don't think it means we're going to 3 atb. It just means we'll be able to rotate, which is something we will need to do this season. 2
Leicester_Loyal Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 Can't see him staying at Burnley now, he'll get the move, not sure if it'll be to us though. 1
dannythefox Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 37 minutes ago, Raw Dykes said: Just curious - is that something you want to see? I'm more interested in seeing Barnes, Vardy and Under terrorising defences as a front 3. It’s about options mate and we don’t have many at the back. Them 3 up front could be very good if it works out 👌🏻
Raw Dykes Posted 27 September 2020 Posted 27 September 2020 6 minutes ago, dannythefox said: It’s about options mate and we don’t have many at the back. Them 3 up front could be very good if it works out 👌🏻 I agree it is good to have a squad that is able to play in different formations, but I think a back 4 has to be our default. That gets the best out of what we've got. If we want to play with 3 at the back often, we probably need at least 2 new CBs. We're finding it hard enough to sign just the one.
Recommended Posts