Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think Under is top drawer, and if he stays injury-free we most likely will sign him up and it'll be a relative bargain at today's prices (wherein a Perez is deemed to "worth" 30 million quid).

 

And, unlike some, glad that he takes the shot from distance. Way too often, we pass around the ball too much around the opposition box, seemingly trying to walk the ball into the net until we invariably lose possession. Compare our possession stats in the final third to actual attempts, and it's criminal.

 

Edited by NaijaFox
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

Any explaination as to why he wasnt on the bench? Think he would have added some much needed quality in the final 3rd today.

In the doghouse alongside Nacho for some strange reason that probably makes sense to Brendan.

Edited by SouthStandUpperTier
Posted
6 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

In the doghouse alongside Nacho for some strange reason that probably makes sense to Brendan.

If he's not on the bench for anything other than a knock/injury i'll be absolutely fuming at rodgers, the boy's played himself into the starting XI imo i cant see why we're not utilising him.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

I'm not outraged. I'm chilled on the sofa polishing off a tub of Quality Street.

You English boys sure do love yourself some sweets! That candy thread over on the general had me in tears. That joachim shabadoo fellow sure knows his sweets. Like a fine art.

Posted
20 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

Lol at you guys getting outraged over absolutely nothing, in all likelihood.

The sleepover last night?

Posted
21 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

Lol at you guys getting outraged over absolutely nothing, in all likelihood.

They need the drama. 

 

He'll be in the squad for Monday and then there'll be a conspiracy about someone else. 

Posted

have to agree we missed an Under cameo today. there was room up front for him to have done some damage with his twists turns and shots.

  • Like 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

 

Tight hamstring chaps, no conspiracy here, as you were 

That might be the case. But in my opinion he's being criminally under used. He's played well in all his cameos and start. Had he been available today, he's the one player I would have wanted bringing on to go for the victory. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Marshall Cockney Fox said:

That might be the case. But in my opinion he's being criminally under used. He's played well in all his cameos and start. Had he been available today, he's the one player I would have wanted bringing on to go for the victory. 

He's been ünder used in the Prem, but started most of the European games and given 90 in a few of them. Expect to see him used more now that Europe is finished for a month or two.

Posted
1 hour ago, honeybradger said:

If he's not on the bench for anything other than a knock/injury i'll be absolutely fuming at rodgers, the boy's played himself into the starting XI imo i cant see why we're not utilising him.

 

45 minutes ago, cruzFOX said:

have to agree we missed an Under cameo today. there was room up front for him to have done some damage with his twists turns and shots.

Agree! Shame about the hammy, because I think he would have run these ragged.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, honeybradger said:

Any explaination as to why he wasnt on the bench? Think he would have added some much needed quality in the final 3rd today.

..possible hamstring problem!!!

Had the scan and they are waiting to see how he feels in the next couple of days. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

The hamstring explains why he wasn't involved today, but I still get the impression BR isn't 100% sold on him for whatever reason.

I agree if BR was impressed with him then he would be starting every game

Posted
2 hours ago, UniFox21 said:

Tight hamstring chaps, no conspiracy here, as you were

 

To be honest, I don't think you need to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that Under is a long way from convincing Rodgers that he's good enough to be a starting winger here. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Marshall Cockney Fox said:

That might be the case. But in my opinion he's being criminally under used. He's played well in all his cameos and start. Had he been available today, he's the one player I would have wanted bringing on to go for the victory. 

Yeah, should be played when injured as well.

  • Haha 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

 

To be honest, I don't think you need to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that Under is a long way from convincing Rodgers that he's good enough to be a starting winger here. 

I'm not sure yet, I'll pass judgement in the next month when our schedule in the league builds up without European games where he was mainly playing. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...