jim5000 Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Utter bullshit. Maddison was clearly onside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, StanSP said: I don't understand this new arm sleeve offside rule. What is and isn't offside? You can score with the sleeve, so obviously that can be offside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 2 minutes ago, ttfn said: To be fair without it the score would still be the same and we’d be livid at the referee I reckon he'd have probably given it. A lot of the time they don't give these things in the knowledge somebody can bail them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shen Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 I don't believe that decision one bit. Aurier was surely canceling that. f*** the offside rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevieLynex Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, MarshallForEngland said: Seemed to be a suspiciously quick decision that. Sometimes they take an age but somehow decided that was offside within seconds. They were waiting on Daniel Levy to give them the decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volpeazzurro Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, goody2028 said: So he’s offside with the one part of the body he can’t score with. Get this shit gone There again, it might have been disallowed because of the celebration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livid Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Kasper options left and right, chips it straight back to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whoareyaaa Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 this needs looking at no way is that offside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bennytwohats Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 They just badly need to bin that rule. such an easy one to solve. Just have a margin and say if it’s within that margin then go with the original decision. A bit like they do in cricket with the umpires call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trabuch Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Spurs are vile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeorgeTheFox Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 How has Son not been booked for that??? What is going on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nod.E Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, TrentFox said: And that’s the other polar extreme of why I hate VAR. insane interpretation Interpretation the key word. You don't hate VAR, you hate the way our rule makers use it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OadbyBlue Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aus Fox Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 3 minutes ago, Phube said: It’s not VAR it’s the offside rule! It is VAR with the shit lines all over the place. If they want to use VAR make it for clear and obvious using the naked eye in real time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcfc cowboys Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 The more we can keep it to 1nil the more space at the back for us to exploit and get another we must keep it tight though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtmcfly Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 1 minute ago, HitchinFox said: VAR needs binning. It simply takes away from the game - adds nothing. Sport is human and errors come with that. But before VAR we would've looked at the replay of Maddison's goal and 100% of those seeing would've said he was onside. And we wouldn't have had a penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest StevieLynex Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, trabuch said: Spurs are vile. The modern day Wimbledon - hoof ball football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluefox1 Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 So off-side with your arm the only part of the body you can't score with. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HybridFox Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Siege mentality. Let's tw** these f**** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmono84 Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Line was wrong position on madders and line on the wrong Spurs defender. That what im angry about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoChiMinhFOX Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, OadbyBlue said: Aurier, even from that angle looks to be playing him on... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UPinCarolina Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Maddison was robbed of a vintage, 2015-16 kind of goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozleicester Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 Just now, Nod.E said: Interpretation the key word. You don't hate VAR, you hate the way our rule makers use it. I HATE VAR and everything it does... game ruining shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester_Loyal Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 1 minute ago, OadbyBlue said: Aurier looks further back than the CB there from that angle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trumpet Posted 20 December 2020 Share Posted 20 December 2020 2 minutes ago, Nod.E said: Can't argue with the ruling. But the rule itself is ridiculous. Change it back to daylight. The thing is, to do that they’d just need to make the lines they use wider. Would work much better IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts