Spurs (A) Match Thread

[jim5000]

Utter bullshit. Maddison was clearly onside 

[UniFox21]

Just now, StanSP said:

I don't understand this new arm sleeve offside rule. What is and isn't offside? 

You can score with the sleeve, so obviously that can be offside

[Dan]

2 minutes ago, ttfn said:

To be fair without it the score would still be the same and we’d be livid at the referee 

I reckon he'd have probably given it. A lot of the time they don't give these things in the knowledge somebody can bail them out.

[shen]

I don't believe that decision one bit. Aurier was surely canceling that. f*** the offside rule

[Guest StevieLynex]

Just now, MarshallForEngland said:

Seemed to be a suspiciously quick decision that. Sometimes they take an age but somehow decided that was offside within seconds. 

They were waiting on Daniel Levy to give them the decision

[volpeazzurro]

Just now, goody2028 said:

So he’s offside with the one part of the body he can’t score with. Get this shit gone 

There again, it might have been disallowed because of the celebration?

[Livid]

Kasper options left and right, chips it straight back to them. 

[whoareyaaa]

this needs looking at no way is that offside

[Guest bennytwohats]

They just badly need to bin that rule.

 

such an easy one to solve. Just have a margin and say if it’s within that margin then go with the original decision. A bit like they do in cricket with the umpires call

[trabuch]

Spurs are vile.

[GeorgeTheFox]

How has Son not been booked for that??? What is going on 

[Nod.E]

Just now, TrentFox said:

And that’s the other polar extreme of why I hate VAR. insane interpretation 

Interpretation the key word. You don't hate VAR, you hate the way our rule makers use it.

[OadbyBlue]

[Aus Fox]

3 minutes ago, Phube said:

It’s not VAR it’s the offside rule!

It is VAR with the shit lines all over the place. If they want to use VAR make it for clear and obvious using the naked eye in real time.

[lcfc cowboys]

The more we can keep it to 1nil the more space at the back for us to exploit and get another we must keep it tight though

[turtmcfly]

1 minute ago, HitchinFox said:

VAR needs binning. It simply takes away from the game - adds nothing. Sport is human and errors come with that. 

 

But before VAR we would've looked at the replay of Maddison's goal and 100% of those seeing would've said he was onside. 

 

And we wouldn't have had a penalty

[Guest StevieLynex]

Just now, trabuch said:

Spurs are vile.

The modern day Wimbledon - hoof ball football

[bluefox1]

So off-side with your arm the only part of the body you can't score with.

[HybridFox]

Siege mentality. Let's tw** these f****

[jmono84]

Line was wrong position on madders and line on the wrong Spurs defender. That what im angry about

[HoChiMinhFOX]

Just now, OadbyBlue said:

Aurier, even from that angle looks to be playing him on...

[UPinCarolina]

Maddison was robbed of a vintage, 2015-16 kind of goal.

[ozleicester]

Just now, Nod.E said:

Interpretation the key word. You don't hate VAR, you hate the way our rule makers use it.

I  HATE VAR and everything it does... game ruining shit

[Leicester_Loyal]

1 minute ago, OadbyBlue said:

Aurier looks further back than the CB there from that angle.

[Trumpet]

2 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

Can't argue with the ruling. But the rule itself is ridiculous. Change it back to daylight.

The thing is, to do that they’d just need to make the lines they use wider. Would work much better IMO