Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Mickyblueeyes
Posted (edited)

I cant believe half the things I've read since the result. This is now normal that's how crazy it is. People are more concerned with players taking a frigging knee to highlight this ridiculous, degusting attitude then actually fixing the problem. 

 

The issue with Social Media is that it gives everyone a voice. That voice is faceless to some extent so people abuse it. They abuse others. Some are so thick they don't even hide it but the majority are cowards who hide behind a profile. With use of social media should come responsibility. Perhaps even a membership scheme. That way its not faceless. Having a voice comes with responsibility and not everyone is willing to take on that responsibility. So take away the privilege. 

 

Don't get me started on morons like Patel and Johnson who chose to advocate abuse of players taking the knee despite repeated explanations of why they were doing it. Guys like Zaha are right, the knee or any other gesture doesnt have the effect because the idiots are not being held accountable but how else do players make a stand. 

Edited by Mickyblueeyes
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, lifted*fox said:

I feel like tackling socia media is one thing - but when you've got people in high places stoking racism and division, you're only masking the problem.

 

the country needs better leaders and better journalists and people need better education.

 

disgusts me how backwards we're headed; something needs doing and soon.

I always see the education part but what we educating? Sitting these people down and saying its wrong? They know that. Issue is they just know they can get away with acting like a **** online because they'll not be punished.

Edited by Fox92
Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

I cant believe half the things I've read since the result. This is now normal that's how crazy it is. People are more concerned with players taking a frigging knee to highlight this ridiculous, degusting attitude then actually fixing the problem. 

 

The issue with Social Media is that it gives everyone a voice. That voice is faceless to some extent so people abuse it. They abuse others. Some or so thick they don't even hide it but the majority are cowards who hide behind a profile. With use of social media should come responsibility. Perhaps even a membership scheme. That way its not faceless. Having a voice comes with responsibility and not everyone is willing to take on that responsibility. So take away the privilege. 

 

Don't get me started on morons like Patel and Johnson who chose to advocate abuse of players taking the knee despite repeated explanations of why they were doing it. Guys like Zaha are right, the knee or any other gesture doesnt have the effect because the idiots are not being held accountable but how else to players make a stand. 

👏👏👏👏

Guest bennytwohats
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Fox92 said:

I always see the education part but what we educating? Sitting these people down and saying its wrong? They know that. Issue is they just know they can get away with acting like a **** online because they'll not be punished.

I think the point is that if people were better educated then ‘being able to get away with it’ wouldn’t be a good reason to do something because they wouldn’t want to do it in the first place. The education piece is helping people understand the consequences their actions have on others, some of the things minority groups have to suffer and tackling misplaced beliefs that might lead to the underlying racism in the first place.

Edited by bennytwohats
Posted (edited)

Im sure social media companies are spouting rubbish about wanting to keep anonymity of their sites. Fine if that's the case, but can there not be a button that each platform can have that states you can only see posts and post to people who have been verified? (by verified I mean willing to provide personal information so that they know who exactly you are)

Obviously this is a short term solution as anonymity still remains but still removes trolls and give them no audience

Edited by Swarles Barkley
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, goose2010 said:

surely the first step is verification on accounts. If any one has ever opened an online gambling account you know what you have to do. They can confirm who you are and where you live. 

 

IT takes about 5 minutes max. 

 

It surely is a starting point? 1 Account per person. 

This would at least clarify the question around overseas interference.

 

Followed by the ability to select who can comment on things - i.e. UK verified accounts only.

  • Like 2
Posted

Surely one part of this is quite easily solved?

The PFA and FA is notoriously awash with money. Is it really beyond their means to pay for the development and launch of their own players social media platform rather than they have to use Twitter, Instagram and the like. I know they shouldn't have to have their own platform but these other huge moneyed companies appear to be doing diddlysquat to combat certain issues.

 

To gain access to the platform and your chosen players account, the football supporter would have to register and supply full personal data including photograph, full name, address and proof of the same ie copy of photo licence, passport or similar. Transgressors can be struck off for minor infringements or in certain cases, be referred to the police for consideration of prosecution. I would suggest that the simple minded neanderthal racist bigots are unlikely to join as these pathetic keyboard warriors usually only spread their filth from behind the safety of an anonymous keyboard. If you think this is a slight on your civil liberties then feel free not to join, you have a choice.

 

Whilst it's not my thing personally, I know my son likes to see what various footballers are up to and their thoughts. I'm sure when we go down to the King Power to watch Wilf, Kelechi and Wes etc, the majority of us just watch and cheer our players and the mere thought of skin colour doesn't even enter into our heads because it is of no relevance to normal people. The fact that 3 of our really young England lads can suffer such vile abuse both turns my stomach and angers me greatly. They need some protection and everyone that could be helping seems to be dragging their feet!

 

The above suggestion would seem to be a reasonable place to start and surely it can't be beyond the wit of man to implement similar. It doesn't cure racism but it can offer a bit of protection I would have thought?

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Jon the Hat said:

I simply don't believe they cannot build some Machine learning tech to scan for racism and auto ban anyone who posts it.  

My point was that social media makes stuff look much more prevalent than it is. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jon the Hat said:

I simply don't believe they cannot build some Machine learning tech to scan for racism and auto ban anyone who posts it.  

Definitely could sin bin posts with trigger words, until approved by a human.

 

  • Like 3
Posted

I'm 33 and I don't recall a time when abuse, racism and open hostility was as rife as it is today.  Discussions here, professionally and in my social life are becoming filled more and more with people yelling at one another in an aggressive binary manner where there is no grey area or space for debate, there is simply right and wrong.  Look at the absolute guff, of which I'm a contributor, in the COVID and politics thread in this forum to see how discussions are increasingly being held.  I'm with x so therefore y is rubbish; it's either with us or against us and feeds animosity in all forums. 

 

Where I'm getting at with this no doubt badly reasoned monologue is that in any problem solving technique we need to identify a "root cause".  What is the problem, do we actually understand where it lies and are we addressing it correctly?

  • People - Does a single one of these knuckle draggers not know what they're doing is wrong?  You can never speak for others, but I strongly believe it's a yes and therefore the "education" we preach will just encourage these puddings to continue doing what they're doing as it reinforces what they're trying to achieve (being hurtful and nasty).  They must get a kick of knowing what they're doing is wrong and surely all this coverage is feeding it.  I'm 100% not saying to ignore this by any means, just an observation I have on this.
  • Targets - Social media blackouts and campaigns, for the above reason, don't seem to work and it's completely wrong that anyone should be denied access to any media platform based on race/religion/football team etc. They have as much right to access as anyone else, any campaign where they're excluding themselves I feel is counter productive and sends the wrong message.
  • The platforms - This is 100% the problem in my eyes.  There's an argument I hear trotted out that the "technology has advanced quicker than the legislation".  Bollocks, how much have Twitter/Facebook/Insta changed in the last decade, not significantly in my opinion.  Look at how quickly legislation was put in place after the Leveson inuiry to deal with the print media.  Now forgetting my cynical view that the legislation was aimed at reducing criticism at government, it came in very fast.  I don't care that they're "social" media platforms, they're still media.  TV, radio, print journalism etc. are all accountable for their output.  If a columnist of a newspaper wrote something abusive, the publication would be held to account.  I completely support social media making accounts be verified so content can be traced back.  There is always the counter argument to this that subversive regimes would use that to crack down on individuals on freedom of expression.  I get that, but I don't feel that is a legitimate concern in this country as, unlike the views of some in there, we don't live in a totalitarian state.  Platforms don't want this verification to happen as it would lead to fewer members and therefore less revenue, simple as.  They need to be accountable for output as well as the users.

We need to go after the social media companies through legislation as they frankly don't give a toss about the problem.

 

One of all time favourite writer's Bertrand Russell said "One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision".  He died in 1970 and I don't think he's ever been more right.

 

tl;dr More people are becoming d**ks, media companies need to be held responsible as well as the users.

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

I simply don't believe they cannot build some Machine learning tech to scan for racism and auto ban anyone who posts it.  

I don't think its possible simply because the word  R A C I S M wouldnt be recognised as a word. I think the main problem is the anonymity of the internet. Anyone can be anyone and it's almost impossible to identify someone.

Edited by yorkie1999
Posted
54 minutes ago, goose2010 said:

surely the first step is verification on accounts. If any one has ever opened an online gambling account you know what you have to do. They can confirm who you are and where you live. 

 

IT takes about 5 minutes max. 

 

It surely is a starting point? 1 Account per person. 

100% this.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, Strokes said:

Definitely could sin bin posts with trigger words, until approved by a human.

 

How would you sin bin  fvck u, fcuk U, fu, fook u or even fuch u? There arn't really any trigger words, it's only when you search for stuff that trigger words become effective, which  the police use to try and track peados and stuff.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...