sacreblueits442 Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 3 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said: If Maddison goes berardi comes? ...who plays at #10......or do we go without one!!!
lcfc sheff Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 8 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said: ...who plays at #10......or do we go without one!!! Without
moore_94 Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 7 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said: ...who plays at #10......or do we go without one!!! 433 rather than 4231 Tielemans, Ndidi, Soumare Praet, Mendy, KDH - if Praet stays, he might if Madders leaves 2
ronnup Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 10 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said: ...who plays at #10......or do we go without one!!! To be fair we would do well to move away from relying on one. 1
sacreblueits442 Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 Just now, ronnup said: To be fair we would do well to move away from relying on one. ....I get the feeling that if it was anyone else, other than a gifted valuable player in that role, we would scrap it and find another shape which would not incorporate him!!!
Ric Flair Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 35 minutes ago, moore_94 said: 433 rather than 4231 Tielemans, Ndidi, Soumare Praet, Mendy, KDH - if Praet stays, he might if Madders leaves We'd still need another attacking creative midfielder as an option, in certain games one would be needed.
splinterdream Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 If we sell maddison to Arsenal it better be for the £70m+, we should not be strengthening them, you have to make them pay. 1
EnderbyFox Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 16 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: We'd still need another attacking creative midfielder as an option, in certain games one would be needed. Coutinho on loan imo.
Ric Flair Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 2 minutes ago, EnderbyFox said: Coutinho on loan imo. I mean that would be outrageous but we'd be foolish to turn it down if we could do it.
Gerard Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 38 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: We'd still need another attacking creative midfielder as an option, in certain games one would be needed.
UHDrive Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 (edited) 47 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: We'd still need another attacking creative midfielder as an option, in certain games one would be needed. If we got rid of Maddison then we'd go from 2 to 1 creative and dynamic forward players. Last year we got lucky with Tielemans being so reliable but when he nor maddison wasn't playing we looked dead beat with no flair. It's awkward this but you are right, and the only attacking creative midfielder we've been linked with is Coutinho. So if maddison went, Berardi was bought with madders sale then we'd be looking at loaning Coutinho or someone like him. What's your opinion? NB ignore this, I overlapped the Coutinho remarks above.. Edited 29 July 2021 by UHDrive Typo
UHDrive Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 8 minutes ago, Gerard said: My post was ironic timing.. 🙈
Ric Flair Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 27 minutes ago, kingfox said: Maddison out Sabitzer in Do it! Sabitzer is rumoured to be available for about £15m due to his deal being up next summer. Would love him here. If we are struggling for finances and could tempt Arsenal to pay £60m for Maddison, Sabitzer + Madueke could be signed with change left over. This is what we do so well and it allows us to buy and max our wage structure for such talented players for a certain amount of years. It's wasier said than done but it works for us and is the best way for us to function without sorcery with FFP or a significant increase in commercial revenue year on year.
sacreblueits442 Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 5 minutes ago, UHDrive said: If we got rid of Maddison then we'd go from 2 to 1 creative and dynamic forward players. Last year we got lucky with Tielemans being so reliable but when he nor maddison wasn't playing we looked dead beat with no flair. It's awkward this but you are right, and the only attacking creative midfielder we've been linked with is Coutinho. So if maddison went, Berardi was bought with madders sale then we'd be looking at loaning Coutinho or someone like him. What's your opinion? ...getting Coutinho would be the example of two terraced houses side by side, one you can rent for £1k a month and the other you can buy with a mortgage of £1k a month!!! Which one makes sense?
UHDrive Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 7 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said: ...getting Coutinho would be the example of two terraced houses side by side, one you can rent for £1k a month and the other you can buy with a mortgage of £1k a month!!! Which one makes sense? Well he's out of our price range to buy, as a detached rural house, so I'm going to happily rent a 3 bed luxury apartment. Voila..
sacreblueits442 Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 1 minute ago, UHDrive said: Well he's out of our price range to buy, as a detached rural house, so I'm going to happily rent a 3 bed luxury apartment. Voila.. ....probably if you were prudent with your finance, you would be able to buy that semi...!!!
UHDrive Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 Just now, sacreblueits442 said: ....probably if you were prudent with your finance, you would be able to buy that semi...!!! How much is he worth again? 🤔. You seem to have a semi-hard on about this...
kingfox Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 8 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Sabitzer is rumoured to be available for about £15m due to his deal being up next summer. Would love him here. If we are struggling for finances and could tempt Arsenal to pay £60m for Maddison, Sabitzer + Madueke could be signed with change left over. This is what we do so well and it allows us to buy and max our wage structure for such talented players for a certain amount of years. It's wasier said than done but it works for us and is the best way for us to function without sorcery with FFP or a significant increase in commercial revenue year on year. Can’t see Maddison leaving, but selling him for 60-70 million would free us up no end to strengthen in 2-3 areas. If finances are currently tight as you say, it would free us up to get in a winger for 20-30 million, plus a top replacement for Maddison, Sabitzer for 15-20 million is an absolute steal. Selling Maddison could actually prove to be shrewd business, and could help us long term.
Grebfromgrebland Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 While we improve our squad and arsenal finish above us
turlo Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 If we're going to look at cashing in on Madders if a silly money offer comes in, then we'd need to be looking at replacements in the next couple of weeks + the right winger we need. The last thing we want is for this deal to be done late in the window and left scrambling around for a replacement with clubs knowing we have 70 mill to spend. 1
majaco Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 Maddison would be worth points to Arsenal. I want him to be.points for Leicester.
CrispinLA in Texas Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 I will feel gutted if he goes, he's given Leicester some great goals, and I enjoy his interviews after games and personally seems to have a decent attitude on the pitch. 2
Crazy Kop Corner Posted 29 July 2021 Posted 29 July 2021 Arsenal's transfer policy is a bit of a joke and there's no way they'll raise £70m or more or provide us with a worthy exchange of players. I could be wrong but Maddison doesn't seem bothered about the interest - He'll be looking for a move to Man U or Man City or possibly Chelsea 1
Popular Post whoareyaaa Posted 29 July 2021 Popular Post Posted 29 July 2021 we would be daft to sell looked good yesterday i thought 7
Recommended Posts