Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
happy85

Maddison

By happy85, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, sly1 said:

We're better than arsenal c,mon why would he go :nigel:

They’d pay him more and  he’d probably enjoy London. he probably won’t stand out so much with all his garish clothing and bags

CrispinLA in Texas

CrispinLA in Texas

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, whoareyaaa said:

we would be daft to sell looked good yesterday i thought

He seems not to sulk or down tools cos he hasn't got his dream move, complete opposite to Mahrez, Maguire or Chilwell. Maddison's  a character and that's what we need in our team

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Jazzy_Jeff

Jazzy_Jeff

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

What annoys me is that Arsenal think they can take him from us but wouldn’t loan us AMN as we’re a direct rival. Sheer arrogance.

 

oh, and they’re shite too. 

  • Like 5
Raw Dykes

Raw Dykes

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

He seems not to sulk or down tools cos he hasn't got his dream move, complete opposite to Mahrez, Maguire or Chilwell. Maddison's  a character and that's what we need in our team

I'm not sure if Maddison would consider a transfer to Arsenal a dream move. He might not even want to leave.

  • Like 3
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, sacreblueits442 said:

...getting Coutinho would be the example of two terraced houses side by side, one you can rent for £1k a month and the other you can buy with a mortgage of £1k a month!!!

Which one makes sense?

Do you work for the Yorkshire Building Society?

  • Haha 2
HighPeakFox

HighPeakFox

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Jazzy_Jeff said:

What annoys me is that Arsenal think they can take him from us

Is this Arsenal the club, or Arsenal the absurd fanbase? If the former, do the club actually think they can 'take' (or buy perhaps) Maddison. 

 

It's wiser to laugh at it, whatever the case. I'm afraid arrogance isn't the sole province of Arsenal or their fans.

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, stu said:

Bad news guy. Maddison is a long term target of Maddison…

Also CONFIRMED! Pete O-Rourke talks out of his Arsenal.

  • Haha 2
Steve Earle

Steve Earle

Posted
Posted (edited)

There is no world in which this (a) makes sense  & (b) happens.

 

Unless one of the Manchester clubs, Chelsea, Juventus, PSG, Barcelona or Real Madrid come knocking this month, with many, many pound notes, Madders will stay with us for at least next season. 
 

Source? Really?!?!

Edited by Steve Earle
  • Like 2
Mike Oxlong

Mike Oxlong

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, stu said:

Bad news guy. Maddison is a long term target of Maddison…

 Terry’s trying very hard to look a bit of a geezer 

Edited by Mike Oxlong
  • Haha 1
  • Popular Post
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

On News24/7 some gigantic Bell-end suggested that Madders was ‘benched’ last night by BR meaning this is a signal he is off to Arsenal because he did not play the whole game!!!

  • Haha 10
Reg Vardy

Reg Vardy

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

On News24/7 some gigantic Bell-end suggested that Madders was ‘benched’ last night by BR meaning this is a signal he is off to Arsenal because he did not play the whole game!!!

Along with every other player?

  • Popular Post
Carl the Llama

Carl the Llama

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 minute ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

Just looked at the Arsenal Mania forum, some reckon that Maddison is a brand and that will easily recoup the outlay with marketing opportunities he will bring and that he's got much more potential then currently with us!

How to tell someone you support a North London club without telling someone you support a North London club 

  • Haha 6
NaijaFox

NaijaFox

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, whoareyaaa said:

we would be daft to sell looked good yesterday i thought

I agree (on all counts)! But perhaps he was trying to look good for Arsenal (or other suitors). lol

Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted

All jokes aside, they’re a joke of a club really.

 

I’d actually rather play for Spurs.
 

As a player, the laughing stock that is Arsenal fan TV (which we all laugh at), isn’t something you’d want to be associated with. I actually think it serves as a hype machine for the Arsenal fan base to wallow in the self entitlement they have as a “big club”. They’d actually be the last of the “big 6”, I’d look to join. Under Wenger they had some direction. Look what the fan base did to Wenger, hounded him with stupid #WengetOut signs. 
 

I’m smiling at all these Arsenal fans that proclaim Maddison to be the saviour, the brand and creative force they need. They had Mesut Ozil, a pretty much like for like player and a) didn’t play him, then B) to a degree hounded him out of the club. 

  • Like 1
KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, Sly said:

All jokes aside, they’re a joke of a club really.

 

I’d actually rather play for Spurs.
 

As a player, the laughing stock that is Arsenal fan TV (which we all laugh at), isn’t something you’d want to be associated with. I actually think it serves as a hype machine for the Arsenal fan base to wallow in the self entitlement they have as a “big club”. They’d actually be the last of the “big 6”, I’d look to join. Under Wenger they had some direction. Look what the fan base did to Wenger, hounded him with stupid #WengetOut signs. 
 

I’m smiling at all these Arsenal fans that proclaim Maddison to be the saviour, the brand and creative force they need. They had Mesut Ozil, a pretty much like for like player and a) didn’t play him, then B) to a degree hounded him out of the club. 

Yeah what a fall from grace. Their signings and links are mid table at best.

  • Like 1
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sly said:

 

 

I’d actually rather play for Spurs.
 

I'd actually rather shit razor blades for a month of Sunday's.

mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, AS78UK said:

Real willing to let Odegaard go now for £43m, can't see Arsenal going for Maddison if that's true.   

 

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/soccer-transfers/story/4441142/arsenal-may-need-50m-for-real-madrids-martin-odegaard-sources

 

 

I doubt Real will accept cash plus Arsenal's dead-wood to make up their valuation of 50m Euros.  Arsenal's fans may have fuched their Club here by encouraging Real to up the price for Odegaard following all this Bull-sh*t talk by AFC Bell-end et al about going for Madders, who is  'reportedly' valued at 60-70m by Leicester?

Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted

What I don’t understand, is that Willock had a breakout season and by all intensive purposes, was the breakout star January onwards. Yet ……. They’re on about farming him out again. 
 

Surely they’ve not thought, “we could do with him”. 

lcfc sheff

lcfc sheff

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, Sly said:

What I don’t understand, is that Willock had a breakout season and by all intensive purposes, was the breakout star January onwards. Yet ……. They’re on about farming him out again. 
 

Surely they’ve not thought, “we could do with him”. 

Honestly £30m and Willock would be enough for me to sell Maddison, really don’t get Arsenal as a club get some any promising youngsters atm but don’t seem to actually want them

  • Haha 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...