Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Leicester to reveal estimated annual losses of £119.5MILLION - the highest in the Premier League

Recommended Posts

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Another reason why the jury’s out as to whether just sacking Rodgers will be ‘the answer’. Some posters are claiming exactly that. That if Rodgers goes, we’ll end up in mid table security.

There’s a lot more to this than just Rodgers. The club is skint. And it’s been run pretty badly now for some time. 
If we are bottom still come the next transfer window, or near to bottom, we won’t have a lot of money to go out and buy a player or two to make a big difference.

The real problem imo is that we have a squad we can’t sell. Whilst people on here have been making a cult hero out of Amartey, have they not realised that he’s on relatively big wages and that no-one wants him. Same for Perez, Vestergaard and umpteen others.

We are in a mess 

Posted
Just now, Tuna said:

Out of interest anyone know what the next biggest losses were in the Premier League?

United's losses will go close to Leicester's, with their deficit to be £117m after splashing out on Cristiano Ronaldo, Jadon Sancho and Raphael Varane last summer.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, urban.spaceman said:

Why is it that Leicester City's finances are affected by our owner's main tourism business because of COVID but Chelsea face no consequences whatsoever by their owner being sanctioned by the UK government because of his connections to a war criminal whom they owe £1.5bn and being sold to another billionaire?

Well, it’s Chelsea isn’t it. 

Posted
Just now, lcfc043 said:

United's losses will go close to Leicester's, with their deficit to be £117m after splashing out on Cristiano Ronaldo, Jadon Sancho and Raphael Varane last summer.

Man U’s make sense ours certainly don’t 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, urban.spaceman said:

Why is it that Leicester City's finances are affected by our owner's main tourism business because of COVID but Chelsea face no consequences whatsoever by their owner being sanctioned by the UK government because of his connections to a war criminal whom they owe £1.5bn and being sold to another billionaire?

HMRC big six bias

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 minute ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

I might be naive here, but shouldn’t the club be separate to KP? 

Yes commercially, but was in response to if KP took money out of the club, which can they do as a dividend - not sure. My ignorance in this area is fairly high to be honest.  lol

Posted
4 minutes ago, Parafox said:

I do wonder if the KP franchise has done similar to the Glazers and used our club to keep their main interests afloat?

We make no money, how are they doing that. :D

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Danny280995 said:

Club needs to be sold, Top can't do it, same excuses next year, we will be protecting the future of the club with its finances. Top doesn't want to admit he can't keep Leicester forward..don't care if people blast me for, the future needs a better investor 

I think he needs the income from the club to keep KP afloat. I fear we've been a cash cow from the start despite the Thai's investment and "loyalty" to the city. Have they conned us?

Posted

For a club with owners in the commercial/retail world, that aspect of their ownership has been dire. PL win should have opened up millions of new fans globally and lots more commercial deals. Especially now we've had the FA cup win, back to back 5th places finishes etc.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Parafox said:

I do wonder if the KP franchise has done similar to the Glazers and used our club to keep their main interests afloat?

I dont think its that.

 

Its more likely that we’ve just got too many personnel in high level positions that have been over promoted and gotten too comfortable. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

I just can't understand the logic of us spending 60m last summer, the only unknown from an income point of view was how far we went in Europe.

 

From a cost point of view there are few unknowns ether, make no sense spending the money unless they thought it would get them CL football. 

They clearly thought that as we were on the cusp of champions league football we went all in. I can’t criticise that - ambition I want to see. Unfortunately in hindsight it’s cost us with poor signings etc  

Posted
1 minute ago, Babylon said:

We make no money, how are they doing that. :D

We do make money. Of course we do. We as ordinary supporters, just don't get to see how or where it goes.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...