Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
davieG

Leicester to reveal estimated annual losses of £119.5MILLION - the highest in the Premier League

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Vindaloo FOX said:

I live in Thailand, been here for a number of years.

 

One thing I've learned, Thai people are awful bussiness people and massive over spenders.

 

They mostly end up broke.

Not wrong in saying political change is ready to blow? 

Posted
1 minute ago, Parafox said:

We do make money. Of course we do. We as ordinary supporters, just don't get to see how or where it goes.

Yeah we do, they release accounts. We lose money all the time and not to them.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Parafox said:

I think he needs the income from the club to keep KP afloat. I fear we've been a cash cow from the start despite the Thai's investment and "loyalty" to the city. Have they conned us?

They clearly aren't telling the truth to us fans, They will never have the money like they did before covid happened. New owner, new director of football, new board team, new manager, then we can rebuild the club and team and go forward again 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

This debacle will go the same way as Derby if we’re not very careful. It looks like incompetence runs deep.

200 million on Seagrave seems utterly ridiculous now. 

Edited by Fazzer 7
Posted
8 minutes ago, ALC Fox said:

Not selling anyone last summer + padding out the squad with expensive backups + awarding new contracts

 

That's surely the reason isn't it?

To the tune of £120m?!

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Parafox said:

I think he needs the income from the club to keep KP afloat. I fear we've been a cash cow from the start despite the Thai's investment and "loyalty" to the city. Have they conned us?

 

 Any dividends or loans repaid will be clearly shown in the accounts.  Unless we see that, cool it!

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, lcfcdamo said:

How is this possible tho it just doesn't make sense 

Let me guess wasting money on s**t players eg 14m for Vesty plus nearly 5m a year wages paying signing on fee for Bertrand and paying him nearly 5m a year, Ward cost us 10m, Hamza on 60k a year....the list goes on etc etc

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, Fazzer 7 said:

This debacle will go the same way as Derby if we’re not very careful. It looks like incompetence runs deep.

200 million on Seagrave seems utterly ridiculous now. 

It wasnt 200m it was 100m and that like everything else at every other club was paid through loans.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Samilktray said:

Hopefully this doesn’t end up like the Glazers because “Srivaddhanaprabhaa out” is a bit of a mouthful 

Would never come to that. They have so much credit in the bank. 

  • Haha 1
Guest Kopfkino
Posted

Everyone knows we spend pretty much all our operating income on wages. So if you make no extra from transfers, why is anyone surprised when you have to pay other things too?

 

Im still skeptical it would be that high, i’d expect it to be closer to 100m

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...