Steve Earle Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 Just now, Kent-Fox said: Good player Relation of yours? 4
Scotch Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 The only up side to this is that we could prob buy him from profits of the scrap metal in Jamie Vardys gym.
Dahnsouff Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 Just now, Scotch said: The only up side to this is that we could prob buy him from profits of the scrap metal in Jamie Vardys gym. Sensing he stole some of your chips
Kinowe Soorie Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 We’re making a Kent of ourselves, this transfer window…
Long Eaton Fox Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 1 minute ago, Kent-Fox said: Good player Your name suggests a little bit of bias 1
Scotch Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Sensing he stole some of your chips Even if he did, he would probably fail to control them and put them out for a goal kick. Edited 26 January 2023 by Scotch 1
Buzzell Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 4 minutes ago, Kent-Fox said: Good player Hi Ryan 👋
Dahnsouff Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 1 minute ago, Scotch said: Even if he did, he would probably fail to control them and put them out for a corner. Your obvious fury at the possibility of this signing is genuinely entertaining 2
StanSP Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 22 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Yes we do, we just need a RW more 6 minutes ago, lanefox said: Well we do but RW is priority Well yeah, exactly. Why are we spending money on a LW, when we don't even have a RW? Why are we not focusing time (and money) on getting a RW first? Hence it being a priority. A LW is below RW, CB, GK and perhaps even CDM, for me.
Dahnsouff Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 Just now, StanSP said: Well yeah, exactly. Why are we spending money on a LW, when we don't even have a RW? Why are we not focusing time (and money) on getting a RW first? Hence it being a priority. A LW is below RW, CB, GK and perhaps even CDM, for me. So therefore get a LW and we would be have solved all our problems
StriderHiryu Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 I was going to ask "if Ryan Kent is the answer, I'm not sure I. want to know the question!" But on second thoughts, for squad depth he would not be the worst option. But he's got to be way down the list before we bring in someone like this. That said stuff is clearly happening, and there are chains of transfers in place. Stuff will get moving next week.
Brizzle Fox Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 I think he was the show pony on loan at Bristol City a couple of seasons ago. If it was him then he was remarkably shit in a very shit team. Bet we sign him.
UHDrive Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 Just now, StriderHiryu said: I was going to ask "if Ryan Kent is the answer, I'm not sure I. want to know the question!" But on second thoughts, for squad depth he would not be the worst option. But he's got to be way down the list before we bring in someone like this. That said stuff is clearly happening, and there are chains of transfers in place. Stuff will get moving next week. There certainly are chains around transfers lately... 1
RowlattsFox Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 I almost want to be a championship club again so we can get excited by rumours. They just depress me these days.
jayfox26 Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 31 minutes ago, StanSP said: We don't need a left winger We do. Barnes is horrendously inconsistent and needs competition. Of course our main priority is a rw but if we can get both then great 2
kingfox Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 He’d be adequate competition for Barnes. But we’re still none the wiser when it comes to a RW, which should be our main priority instead of someone like Kent.
StanSP Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 1 minute ago, jayfox26 said: We do. Barnes is horrendously inconsistent and needs competition. Of course our main priority is a rw but if we can get both then great But I doubt we can get both. I doubt the finances are there? Hence needing to spend money where it's needed more first.
StriderHiryu Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 5 minutes ago, UHDrive said: There certainly are chains around transfers lately... Unless you are one of the absolute elites, or scattergun Chelsea, that's the way it goes. It took Man United 3 weeks to bring in Wout Weghorst! This stuff applies to almost all clubs. 1
Outfox the Fox Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 Nah - another right footed left winger - we don't want another. And with SERIOUS attitude problems. Avoid at all costs. Anyway, it almost certainly is the work of another agent, trying to bump up a better contract. 1
brookfox Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 If it wasn’t at the expense of a RW and he replaced someone like Praet in the squad I’d be all over it. We’re so short of pace off the bench and competition for Barnes for the expected price it looks very sensible.
westernpark Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 Just now, Fox92 said: Will we ever sign a right winger again. We haven’t signed once since Wayne Brown. 1
TrickyTrevLeftPeg Posted 26 January 2023 Posted 26 January 2023 21 minutes ago, StanSP said: Well yeah, exactly. Why are we spending money on a LW, when we don't even have a RW? Why are we not focusing time (and money) on getting a RW first? Hence it being a priority. A LW is below RW, CB, GK and perhaps even CDM, for me. Exactly this. A LW is least of our worries. He's a decent player but I'd rather have a RW, CB, GK and a CM before a new left winger. We don't have a bottomless pit at the moment so need to sure up priority areas instead of getting players in who may be just a rotation option
Recommended Posts