Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
ClaphamFox

Leicester 'could face points deduction next season'

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, HybridFox said:

Letting Soyuncu and Tielemans go on a free was absolute criminal. About to do the same with N'Didi and Nacho

At the same time you can’t make clubs come in for your players. If we have high valuations that’s one thing but Tielemans and soyuncu we never got offers for. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Foxin_Mad said:

Whilst I largely agree with sticking it to the establishment and the blob, Im not quite sure how a Labour government helps with this, they are all part of the elitist establishment and protection of this status. 

Labour are the incoming government and pressure needs to be put on them by the club, non-“big” clubs, and fan groups like @Foxes_Trust to understand the state of the sport and how to rectify it without fear or favour for the corrupt clubs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, HybridFox said:

Letting Soyuncu and Tielemans go on a free was absolute criminal. About to do the same with N'Didi and Nacho

Soyuncu & Tielemans refused to leave and were determined to run down their contracts, how would you have forced them to act differently?

Who is N'Didi?

The player called Ndidi who plays for us has been a revelation this season and could make the difference betwen promotion or slumming it down in The Championship for at least another season, would you prefer that we'd have sold him for £5m (we weren't going to get much based on final year of contract and his form over the previous two seasons having been poor).

Iheanacho was expected by many to be scoring 30 goals this season, should we have forced him out for not much and potentially have lost those goals.

Hindsight is a great thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

Not sacking Rodgers was absolute madness, I will never forgive those at the top for hanging onto that idiot for so long. I've had zero faith in the ownership of the club for about 18/24 months now.

Refusing to invest, when already breaching FFP anyway, Only Top and Whelan can do that. O_o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nolucklcfc said:

Interesting how it’s a Leeds supporting journalist reporting it when we happen to be in our worst form of the season. 

Where's the suggestion he's a Leeds fan? His twitter account has no sign of Leeds instead suggestions that he's a Cambridge fan? 

 

Or are we already heading for the Everton foil hat club? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Nolucklcfc said:

At the same time you can’t make clubs come in for your players. If we have high valuations that’s one thing but Tielemans and soyuncu we never got offers for. 

Agreed. 

 

The club were in a unique position for a club of our size, in that we couldn't adequately replace any players of that calibre sold.

 

Selling Tielemans at his peak would've have been a damaging admission that we weren't a 'real' top six contender and, a ready made, affordable player to step into that level (and one prepared to play for a club of our size) would be almost impossible to find. 

 

Sell Youri. Damage ambitious brand. Replace with, say, Winks, and tumble back to lower mid table. It wasn't an easy conundrum tbf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ConnFoxUS said:

Surely @Foxes_Trust has some insight here, given their post-season Q&A with the club after last season’s debacle. Maybe they’ll weigh in with some knowledge of the situation?

You think the club will have given them permission to publicly discuss our finances?

You think the club will have discussed finances with them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Babylon said:

 

 

How is it beyond belief? We got relegated, something that would never have been in the budget. 

Because relegation would have had minimal impact on the 2022/23 accounts. That mess is to come in 2023/24. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pliskin said:

Also, how have Villa not been looked at? They’ve spent a colossal amount of money since they returned to the PL haven’t they? 

Made pure profit on Ramsay, Archer, Grealish, Philogene, Azaz, Chukwumeka totalling 160m. 
 

Made money on Targett too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OriginalRobboFOX said:

But didn’t we agree payment in instalments over a prolonged amount of time and then leverage the instalments for cash monies so we could spend? That will affect the bottom line I’m sure…

That was for cashflow not FFP, we have both FFP and cashflow issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Nolucklcfc said:

At the same time you can’t make clubs come in for your players. If we have high valuations that’s one thing but Tielemans and soyuncu we never got offers for. 

Athletico came in a season early for Soyuncu we turned it down, even though the manager didnt want to play him, I assume it was the usual "doesnt meet our valuation".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much have we actually saved including new additions.

 

Kieran Maguire Said at the end of last season 

 


"If it was in the Championship, realistically we would be looking somewhere in the region of £70-80m. The wage bill was £180m. Clearly that’s not sustainable and that would impact upon people.

Edited by HankMarvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Babylon said:

 

 

How is it beyond belief? We got relegated, something that would never have been in the budget. 

Player sales? But I guess whether they’ve been enough is a key question - look at the donkeys still on the books who have been forced to into being used this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Made pure profit on Ramsay, Archer, Grealish, Philogene, Azaz, Chukwumeka totalling 160m. 
 

Made money on Targett too. 

I believe their gross spend is over 1/2 billion, £350m net in 5 years. Their owner taking ownership of their ground put £80m into the pot, else they'd have been sanctioned during the promotion season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Villa are definitely sailing close to the wind now. I'm sure Emery mentioned it before the start of the season during their summer business. All the clubs from 7th down to thr bottom three are tbh. The rules are there to restrict all those clubs from catching up too much and making them need to sell their best players. 

 

In fact Villa have just today announced a £120m loss for 22/23 period. Though there will be allowances in there that will likely bring it down a bit. 

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/aston-villa-reveal-huge-losses-28753882

 

They reckon they are still within PSR though as their revenue increased substantially. 

Edited by The Bear
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fear Of The Fox said:

People reading and taking seriously The Sun! What's next, people reading and taking seriously The Guardian? 

Also whoever believes an incoming Labour gov will care more about football they're in for a big surprise. 

Yer but

Yer but..

Freddie Starr did eat a hamster!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...