Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

EFL Statement - Club has no obligation to submit and agree business plan

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, kyleolly said:

I’ve heard Ping Kower LTD are set to agree a significant sponsorship deal in the next few weeks we are all good

You joke but I can see us signing a new shirt deal once we are promoted with another Asian company.

 

Being a PL club allows us to broker a better deal.

 

 

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted
Just now, ramadaone said:

John Percy burnt a few bridges there

Very strange

he's not been breaking news on us for a while unless its negative

  • Like 2
Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

You joke but I can see us signing a new shirt deal once we are promoted with another Asian company.

 

Being a PL club allows us to broker a better deal.

 

 

they should look at reselling the ground naming rights too

  • Like 1
Wymsey

Wymsey

Posted
Posted (edited)

Am sure will be fine, but really have to learn from it.

 

But am annoyed Top and Whelan haven't managed the whole situation better.

Edited by Wymsey
dannythefox

dannythefox

Posted
Posted (edited)

Come June 5/6 players probably won’t be here, we’ll be fine. The books will balance plus nobody has been sacked from letting this get like this so It can’t be a big deal to the club.

Edited by dannythefox
  • Haha 1
goose2010

goose2010

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

You joke but I can see us signing a new shirt deal once we are promoted with another Asian company.

 

Being a PL club allows us to broker a better deal.

 

 

Absolutely, one year of a Thai betting company and the issue goes away, 

 

 

  • Like 1
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, adam said:

We can't have many saleable players left. Especially when everyone's wage goes up next season when we get promoted( hopefully)

Worrying times

I’m still wondering if the relegation clauses aren’t repayable on promotion in the first season 

if I was an agent then that that’s what I would have asked for in return of accepting a relegation clause 

whoareyaaa

whoareyaaa

Posted
Posted (edited)

we have spunked a lot on players that have not offered anything, then go out on loan and we still end up paying there wage lol Praet, Soumare, Souttar, Kristensen, Bertrand, Silva to name a few then Rodgers record deal after being in the job for a few months.

 

also no re sale on players like Soy, Youri and others.

 

Rudkin masterclass

Edited by whoareyaaa
HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted
Just now, Wymsey said:

Am sure will be fine, but really have to learn from it.

You would hope a club that have previously been in administration would take extra caution.

  • Like 1
ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Babylon said:

But he’s not reporting on conjecture or anything else regarding those results. He literally states it depends on our last set of results and offers not a single opinion about them. He’s reported plenty without cold hard facts before, and just used his sources and just come out and said it. If he was sure of a good source he would just say 

 

He is saying we could be in trouble if they are bad results. We all know that don’t we? His wording is pretty clear, it all depends on those results. 

In the article in the Telegraph, Percy writes:

 

“Last year they announced record losses of £92.5 million for the 2021-22 season, and it is understood that latest financial accounts are also likely to report a heavy deficit when they are announced this month.”

trugerkem

trugerkem

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, Nalis said:

Cant work out whats broken; us, football or both.

Football has been broken for years … it’s irreparable now 

  • Like 1
Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted

Given how conservatively we acted in 2022/23, and openly said we were doing it to comply, I doubt our figures for that year would be terrible. This year- no idea but obviously the allowed losses are much less.

 

This is the problem with this news coming out before the accounts have been released. We might be fine, we might not but the speculation won't help.

  • Like 2
Guest Chocolate Teapot

Guest Chocolate Teapot

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

go above him, contact KPI, parent company and ask them why its subsidiary has been run so poorly

They've tried that too. They only interview in favourable terms in Thailand.

Will1981

Will1981

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, K789 said:

Makes the tom cannon signing even more baffling 

I think he was signed to replace Daka then Bournemouth pulled out of the deal. So strange to have 4 strikers on the books when Enzo never has more than 1 on the pitch at a time.

iancognito

iancognito

Posted
Posted

Go up and the PL will throw the book at us. Stay down and the EFL will tear us a new one.

 

Personally I'll choose going up. I prefer to scramble to 40pts than have to fight past 24 desperate husks of former football clubs all whining about "Parachute FC" as we sell off our last remaining assets on the pitch.

  • Like 1
Guest Chocolate Teapot

Guest Chocolate Teapot

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

he's not been breaking news on us for a while unless its negative

Has there been anything positive to report?

 

And added to that he did a really favourable piece with enzo a month ago.

Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

They've tried that too. They only interview in favourable terms in Thailand.

go to the board members, keep asking them, even if they don't answer they may demand answers and actions from Top

HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Corky said:

Given how conservatively we acted in 2022/23, and openly said we were doing it to comply, I doubt our figures for that year would be terrible. This year- no idea but obviously the allowed losses are much less.

 

This is the problem with this news coming out before the accounts have been released. We might be fine, we might not but the speculation won't help.

Yeah but they buckled towards the end of the window and spunked 31m plus tete loan fee

Edited by HankMarvin
  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...