Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
moore_94

EFL Statement - Club has no obligation to submit and agree business plan

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, kyleolly said:

I’ve heard Ping Kower LTD are set to agree a significant sponsorship deal in the next few weeks we are all good

You joke but I can see us signing a new shirt deal once we are promoted with another Asian company.

 

Being a PL club allows us to broker a better deal.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ramadaone said:

John Percy burnt a few bridges there

Very strange

he's not been breaking news on us for a while unless its negative

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

You joke but I can see us signing a new shirt deal once we are promoted with another Asian company.

 

Being a PL club allows us to broker a better deal.

 

 

they should look at reselling the ground naming rights too

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am sure will be fine, but really have to learn from it.

 

But am annoyed Top and Whelan haven't managed the whole situation better.

Edited by Wymsey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come June 5/6 players probably won’t be here, we’ll be fine. The books will balance plus nobody has been sacked from letting this get like this so It can’t be a big deal to the club.

Edited by dannythefox
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

You joke but I can see us signing a new shirt deal once we are promoted with another Asian company.

 

Being a PL club allows us to broker a better deal.

 

 

Absolutely, one year of a Thai betting company and the issue goes away, 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, adam said:

We can't have many saleable players left. Especially when everyone's wage goes up next season when we get promoted( hopefully)

Worrying times

I’m still wondering if the relegation clauses aren’t repayable on promotion in the first season 

if I was an agent then that that’s what I would have asked for in return of accepting a relegation clause 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we have spunked a lot on players that have not offered anything, then go out on loan and we still end up paying there wage lol Praet, Soumare, Souttar, Kristensen, Bertrand, Silva to name a few then Rodgers record deal after being in the job for a few months.

 

also no re sale on players like Soy, Youri and others.

 

Rudkin masterclass

Edited by whoareyaaa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Babylon said:

But he’s not reporting on conjecture or anything else regarding those results. He literally states it depends on our last set of results and offers not a single opinion about them. He’s reported plenty without cold hard facts before, and just used his sources and just come out and said it. If he was sure of a good source he would just say 

 

He is saying we could be in trouble if they are bad results. We all know that don’t we? His wording is pretty clear, it all depends on those results. 

In the article in the Telegraph, Percy writes:

 

“Last year they announced record losses of £92.5 million for the 2021-22 season, and it is understood that latest financial accounts are also likely to report a heavy deficit when they are announced this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given how conservatively we acted in 2022/23, and openly said we were doing it to comply, I doubt our figures for that year would be terrible. This year- no idea but obviously the allowed losses are much less.

 

This is the problem with this news coming out before the accounts have been released. We might be fine, we might not but the speculation won't help.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, K789 said:

Makes the tom cannon signing even more baffling 

I think he was signed to replace Daka then Bournemouth pulled out of the deal. So strange to have 4 strikers on the books when Enzo never has more than 1 on the pitch at a time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go up and the PL will throw the book at us. Stay down and the EFL will tear us a new one.

 

Personally I'll choose going up. I prefer to scramble to 40pts than have to fight past 24 desperate husks of former football clubs all whining about "Parachute FC" as we sell off our last remaining assets on the pitch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

They've tried that too. They only interview in favourable terms in Thailand.

go to the board members, keep asking them, even if they don't answer they may demand answers and actions from Top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Corky said:

Given how conservatively we acted in 2022/23, and openly said we were doing it to comply, I doubt our figures for that year would be terrible. This year- no idea but obviously the allowed losses are much less.

 

This is the problem with this news coming out before the accounts have been released. We might be fine, we might not but the speculation won't help.

Yeah but they buckled towards the end of the window and spunked 31m plus tete loan fee

Edited by HankMarvin
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...