jonny_wright Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Worth €25m if they take the option, do we even break even at that price? Sounds like we got rid at all costs in thr end
ajthefox Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 So basically he plays somewhere else for a year and comes back here unhappy most likely, what fecking use is that. 1
Tuna Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Lets wait and see what the more reliable journos with us say first before overreacting... 4
moore_94 Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 (edited) Hahaha that is a fvcking disgusting deal if true Done well with the likes of JJ and McAteer to end up just completing fvcking it with this one Edited 31 August 2025 by moore_94
Swarles Barkley Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 So to clarify - its less than the release clause - its a loan so no money to invest - its not even an obligation to buy As much of a cvnt Rudkin is surely even this twat didnt sign off on this 1
FoxOnWheels Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Basically we’ve pushed the issue down the road for a year
Grebfromgrebland Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 So we can still make a loss if he isn't bought by Stuttgart
FoxyPalace.com Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 He will be back next season when they see the attitude problem.
Dahnsouff Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Let’s see the final details, these are the partisan reports. 4
kingpowerout Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Benji said: A loan this season would suggest we are PSR compliant and therefore saving the fee for next year. Assuming we’ve driven the structure that is… Ahhhh at last…a response with logic and not emotion Edited 31 August 2025 by kingpower
nnfox Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 1 minute ago, Swarles Barkley said: So to clarify - its less than the release clause - its a loan so no money to invest - its not even an obligation to buy As much of a cvnt Rudkin is surely even this twat didnt sign off on this And we're probably paying the bulk of his wages.
Tielemans63 Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 (edited) 9 minutes ago, jonny_wright said: I hope this a journo talking bollocks, otherwise that's a ****ing honking deal. How do we benefit at all from this arrangement? Edited 31 August 2025 by Tielemans63
GingerrrFox Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Tbf to Rudkin which is not something I’d normally say, he was stuck between a rock and a hard place on this Bilal deal. The shit **** made it clear he wasn’t going to keep playing here but no one was prepared to pay the money, now he’s out the club and not spreading toxic behaviour and he either moves permanently or he’s in the shop window to move elsewhere next summer. 2
Nolucklcfc Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 No money to invest … get this bloke out immediately ffs 1
Popular Post EnderbyFox Posted 31 August 2025 Popular Post Posted 31 August 2025 Surely you’d just keep him if that’s the only offer on the table… let him sulk for a few weeks until he realises the only way he’s playing for Morocco is to have a good season here 10
CL Fox Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 On 25/08/2025 at 09:55, CL Fox said: Looks like hes about 3rd or 4th choice for palace. Deadline day loan move to Leeds I reckon. I meant Stuttgart.
dooflip Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Have they not just pocketed 80mil for a striker they signed for free a year ago? How on earth has this been allowed to happen? A loan with an option does not benefit us at all. It barely affects PSR, and doesn’t give us money to strengthen and replace BEK, who was one of our best players. Make it make sense. 3
damolcfc Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 1 minute ago, GingerrrFox said: Tbf to Rudkin which is not something I’d normally say, he was stuck between a rock and a hard place on this Bilal deal. The shit **** made it clear he wasn’t going to keep playing here but no one was prepared to pay the money, now he’s out the club and not spreading toxic behaviour and he either moves permanently or he’s in the shop window to move elsewhere next summer. Yep, only sensible option really, if nobody wants to buy him, last thing we want is left with dead wood.
Aleksz Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 (edited) Awful deal, but devils advocate, he could double his value with a year over there. Edit: thinking about it this is a stupid point as they can just activate their option and then sell for profit Edited 31 August 2025 by Aleksz 2
Jaspa Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Just loan one of our best players out and offer the option to sign him permanently as a bargain if you want? Sound
Lcfc-1992 Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 Thought he’d agreed a 4 year deal according to a more reliable journalist earlier? 2
brucey Posted 31 August 2025 Posted 31 August 2025 6 minutes ago, Benji said: A loan this season would suggest we are PSR compliant and therefore saving the fee for next year. Assuming we’ve driven the structure that is… Should have been a straight up obligation rather than option if that was the case
Recommended Posts
Posted by FrankieADZ,
David Ornstein - Palace want BEK if Eze leaves
Recommended by Finnegan
0 reactions
Go to this post