Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So basically he plays somewhere else for a year and comes back here unhappy most likely, what fecking use is that.

  • Like 1
Posted

Lets wait and see what the more reliable journos with us say first before overreacting...

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

Hahaha that is a fvcking disgusting deal if true

 

Done well with the likes of JJ and McAteer to end up just completing fvcking it with this one

Edited by moore_94
Posted

So to clarify

 

- its less than the release clause

- its a loan so no money to invest

- its not even an obligation to buy

 

As much of a cvnt Rudkin is surely even this twat didnt sign off on this

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Benji said:

A loan this season would suggest we are PSR compliant and therefore saving the fee for next year.  Assuming we’ve driven the structure that is…

Ahhhh at last…a response with logic and not emotion 

Edited by kingpower
Posted
1 minute ago, Swarles Barkley said:

So to clarify

 

- its less than the release clause

- its a loan so no money to invest

- its not even an obligation to buy

 

As much of a cvnt Rudkin is surely even this twat didnt sign off on this

And we're probably paying the bulk of his wages.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, jonny_wright said:

 

I hope this a journo talking bollocks, otherwise that's a ****ing honking deal. How do we benefit at all from this arrangement?

Edited by Tielemans63
Posted

Tbf to Rudkin which is not something I’d normally say, he was stuck between a rock and a hard place on this Bilal deal. The shit **** made it clear he wasn’t going to keep playing here but no one was prepared to pay the money, now he’s out the club and not spreading toxic behaviour and he either moves permanently or he’s in the shop window to move elsewhere next summer. 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 25/08/2025 at 09:55, CL Fox said:

Looks like hes about 3rd or 4th choice for palace.

 

Deadline day loan move to Leeds I reckon.

I meant Stuttgart.

Posted

Have they not just pocketed 80mil for a striker they signed for free a year ago? How on earth has this been allowed to happen? A loan with an option does not benefit us at all. It barely affects PSR, and doesn’t give us money to strengthen and replace BEK, who was one of our best players. Make it make sense.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, GingerrrFox said:

Tbf to Rudkin which is not something I’d normally say, he was stuck between a rock and a hard place on this Bilal deal. The shit **** made it clear he wasn’t going to keep playing here but no one was prepared to pay the money, now he’s out the club and not spreading toxic behaviour and he either moves permanently or he’s in the shop window to move elsewhere next summer. 

Yep, only sensible option really, if nobody wants to buy him, last thing we want is left with dead wood.

Posted (edited)

Awful deal, but devils advocate, he could double his value with a year over there. 
 

Edit: thinking about it this is a stupid point as they can just activate their option and then sell for profit lol

Edited by Aleksz
  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Benji said:

A loan this season would suggest we are PSR compliant and therefore saving the fee for next year.  Assuming we’ve driven the structure that is…

Should have been a straight up obligation rather than option if that was the case

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...