Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 17/12/2025 at 11:24, AKCJ said:

I do think that he might be our worst ever striker. Certainly in my time and i've seen some absolute stinkers.

 

He's got no redeeming traits or abilities.

You must be too young to have watched Mick Duffy

Posted

 

3 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Why is he on the bench if he is never going to be used, yesterday we were losing at home and only used 4 subs and yet the manager would rather chase the game with Hamza Choudhury than change shape or bring on Carranza to try and save the result. Absolutely comical, would rather see Jake Evans or Lorenz Hutchinson given a go on the bench than see Carranza getting splinters on his arse. 

I think he’s on the bench as it avoids some sort of penalty loan fee to Feyenoord. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

 

I think he’s on the bench as it avoids some sort of penalty loan fee to Feyenoord. 

Unbelievable, how are we so bad at negotiating deals for incoming players. Surely it should be a flat loan fee and wage contribution. Plus adds on for team and individual performance. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Unbelievable, how are we so bad at negotiating deals for incoming players. Surely it should be a flat loan fee and wage contribution. Plus adds on for team and individual performance. 

Maybe we were sensible and included a break clause as we aren't sure.

Posted
44 minutes ago, kenny said:

Maybe we were sensible and included a break clause as we aren't sure.

I really hope we do, however it’s concerning it @Muzzy_no7 is correct as we have agreed to include a penalty fee every time said player we were unsure about is not included on the bench 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

I really hope we do, however it’s concerning it @Muzzy_no7 is correct as we have agreed to include a penalty fee every time said player we were unsure about is not included on the bench 

I'd have thought it was fairly standard for most bigger sides loaning players to lower league sides. You want the player playing and improving so you can sell him at profit or re-integrate him when useful. Him having to be in a percentage of match day squads when fit seems logical. We don't have to play him and seeing as you can have so many subs these days not really a massive bind.

 

We just need to send him back in January and try a different route. 

Posted
5 hours ago, fkas said:

I'd have thought it was fairly standard for most bigger sides loaning players to lower league sides. You want the player playing and improving so you can sell him at profit or re-integrate him when useful. Him having to be in a percentage of match day squads when fit seems logical. We don't have to play him and seeing as you can have so many subs these days not really a massive bind.

 

We just need to send him back in January and try a different route. 

Hopefully we can. !!

Posted

I wonder if it is in his contract or something for him to be in the matchday squad. Never selected. Bizarre.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Tuna said:

I wonder if it is in his contract or something for him to be in the matchday squad. Never selected. Bizarre.

1 more appearance and some more money maybe? Very odd

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, dmayne7 said:

1 more appearance and some more money maybe? Very odd

You’d think he’d not feature at all if that was the case, ala Eduoard. 
 

Bizarre he’s on the bench at all, if we isn’t going to get used.

 

Just a total waste of money and squad slot since he joined. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Tuna said:

I wonder if it is in his contract or something for him to be in the matchday squad. Never selected. Bizarre.

Is it bizarre? It's like we've signed the modern day Ali Dia. He's so out of his depth.

  • Like 1
Posted

I’ve gone very “football manager” here but, let’s be honest they do base transfer clauses on real world. 

 

The “unused” loan fee extra payment applies when someone is left out of a squad entirely. So I’d assume he’s on the bench so we don’t have to pay that. 

Posted
3 hours ago, bovril said:

Very mid 2000s kind of signing. Sexy foreign player, people get a bit excited, turns out to be amateurish, plays 10 games and leaves. 

Yeah I was gutted we didn’t give Marco Ferreira a game.

Posted
3 hours ago, AjcW said:

I’ve gone very “football manager” here but, let’s be honest they do base transfer clauses on real world. 

 

The “unused” loan fee extra payment applies when someone is left out of a squad entirely. So I’d assume he’s on the bench so we don’t have to pay that. 

This all day long.He must feel like a spare ***** at a wedding.

Posted
3 hours ago, bovril said:

Very mid 2000s kind of signing. Sexy foreign player, people get a bit excited, turns out to be amateurish, plays 10 games and leaves. 

hey now, Nils Eric Johansson played more than 10 games.

Posted
23 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Why he's on the bench instead of Jake Evans given he will NEVER be used is typical of this club currently.

Are we sure it isn't linked to a clause in his contract 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...