cjslcfc Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Hutton was Schlupp's man. Absolutely. Not a clue why Schlupp decides to stand next to our centre back and is completely unaware of the oncoming Hutton, who had made his run from his own half. Surely someone spotted Hutton?!
TonyN11 Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Bizarre. Will we appeal? Absolutely, this should be a 3 game ban. I don't want him missing just one game!
The Horse's Mouth Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Hutton was Schlupp's man. He should be Konch's though, I couldn't see him anywhere. Surely he's experienced enough not to leave the in form fullback with Jeffrey fecking Schlupp.
KFS Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Completely bizzare. Fvcking cvnts in my uni bar cheering when Konch got sent off. What an evening for being a bellend.
Corky Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Wanting players injured and suspended now are we? Fvck me, what terrible support.
sdb Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Terrible decision but it didn't really change the game and I doubt we'd have equalised with him on. Hutton is a **** tho - he studded Schlupp in the back minutes before which was a clear yellow at least too.
foxfanazer Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Really weird decision from the ref. Don't want Konchesky in the team but we should appeal
justfoxes Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Totally biZare from where I was it was Hutton who was the twat at fault !! Typical fa dodgy referee !!
notnow john Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 And Hutton blatantly kicked out at Schluup in his back also. Dirty scumbag player. Said in interview afterwards he was a little surprised Konch saw red. Scumbag player Should not of been on the pitch after that kick in Schluups back, was it only you and I that saw it?
stingray Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Konchesky is a clown and is not Premier League (or Championship) he deserved his sending off today for being 100m out of position on Villa's second goal and his idiotic taunting of Hutton after he'd gone right through him. No sympathy at all.
UpTheLeagueFox Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 The ref could've given a yellow for Konchesky's foul and a yellow each for the subsequent coming together - wouldn't have had complaints with that.
DB11 Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 He should be Konch's though, I couldn't see him anywhere. Surely he's experienced enough not to leave the in form fullback with Jeffrey fecking Schlupp. Konch had to come into the middle to cover Wasyl
woddyuk Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 I actually thought we played better attacking wise with a man less. But can anyone explain how the **** Hutton didn't get sent off for a) retaliation b)headbutting c) pushing konch in the chest? And if konchs tackle was worth a red why wasn't Vardys or Clarkes?? #inconsistent crap officials with no clue and less bottle. And don't even start me on when he studded Jeff in the back.
Collymore Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 I seriously expected to come on here and people would be calling for Konchesky never to play for us again for spitting! I thought he'd spat in his face after the tackle. Obviously he didn't otherwise at least one other person would have mentioned it, but it looked like it to me...
inckley fox Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Wanting players injured and suspended now are we? Fvck me, what terrible support. I don't think anyone wishes any of our players any ill. They're just saying that a suspension could lead to us finding a better alternative in Schlupp. And this has happened in the past. Injury to Lowe led to us bringing in Joachim in 92, and injury to Speedie led to Walsh getting the nod in the final in 94. In fact, suspensions and injuries and backroom bust-ups have been responsible for the initial emergence of many of our best players over time - Grayson in for Mills in 93, Heskey in for Roberts in 96, Izzet in for Parker the same year, Guppy for Ullathorne in 97.
Corky Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 I don't think anyone wishes any of our players any ill. They're just saying that a suspension could lead to us finding a better alternative in Schlupp. They do, I've seen comments on different sites where fans are pleased a player is injured (Nugent this week) and now a player is suspended. Schlupp isn't a better alternative at all.
notnow john Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 The ref could've given a yellow for Konchesky's foul and a yellow each for the subsequent coming together - wouldn't have had complaints with that. Yes Geoff,but it was a straight red,not two yellows.
Claridge Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 We I don't think anyone wishes any of our players any ill. They're just saying that a suspension could lead to us finding a better alternative in Schlupp. And this has happened in the past. Injury to Lowe led to us bringing in Joachim in 92, and injury to Speedie led to Walsh getting the nod in the final in 94. In fact, suspensions and injuries and backroom bust-ups have been responsible for the initial emergence of many of our best players over time - Grayson in for Mills in 93, Heskey in for Roberts in 96, Izzet in for Parker the same year, Guppy for Ullathorne in 97. For your logic to work we need at least 8 more injuries or sending offs
justfoxes Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Astonishing refereeing. Absolutely astonishing. ABSOFOOKINGLUTELY !!
Monk Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Was a horrific decision by the ref. If he'd sent Vardy off I could understand but the Konchesky tackle was innocuous and the reaction was verbal not physical. Hope it gets rescinded.
Bert Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 They've not had a proper explanation from the ref - not surprised with how arrogant they all are these days. So they're gonna have to wait for the report. How Konch get sent off and Hutton didn't though!?
Dan Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Absolutely shocking decision but I assume there'll be nothing done about it in terms of the ref. Maybe if he'd committed a true refereeing crime and gone to see Ed Sheeran then action would be taken.
Hirsty The Blue 94 Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Wait people are actually blaming Konch for the second goal :xmaslaugh: , have you ever played football!? Wasyl was sucked across, meaning Konch had to come across also, Schlupp should have been covering but instead was ball watching like the gormless fool he is instead of tracking the run of Hutton. You folk will use any excuse to blame a player you don't like.
katieakita Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 How some think the decision had no bearing on the game is beyond me, it was a red card incident for Hutton and we would have been 11 against 10, sadly with no clear explanation for the sending the Premier league will have time to justify the decision, looking forward to the reasoning behind Hutton not having a straight red.
Dickov22 Posted 7 December 2014 Posted 7 December 2014 Red or no red, we'd still have lost. Once again we resort to lumping balls into the box. Never works
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.