cunica Posted 13 February 2016 Posted 13 February 2016 What did he get sent off for? Saw only the second yellow-for sliding and it really was for yellow.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 13 February 2016 Posted 13 February 2016 What did he get sent off for?A red card I think
Webbo Posted 13 February 2016 Posted 13 February 2016 At least with Kram sent off I won't have to watch that shit next week.
lgfualol Posted 13 February 2016 Posted 13 February 2016 Surprised he even made a tackle in the first place
Tuna Posted 13 February 2016 Posted 13 February 2016 More like Kraparic am I right Brilliant in the space of 22 posts we've gone from describing him from 'world class' to 'krap'.
TJB-fox Posted 14 February 2016 Posted 14 February 2016 Praying he does well there and comes back to us completely revitalised, as with Benny too, but just don't think it's going to happen for Kram here
Lambert09 Posted 14 February 2016 Posted 14 February 2016 Maybe he thinks the squad are going back to Denmark next weekend as we're not playing
MC Prussian Posted 14 February 2016 Posted 14 February 2016 He isn't very good let's just all move on Depends on what criteria a striker has to fulfill to make it into your "Very Good Striker" list. Is scoring goals one of them?
Guest Posted 15 February 2016 Posted 15 February 2016 Depends on what criteria a striker has to fulfill to make it into your "Very Good Striker" list. Is scoring goals one of them? Having a fancy name, a big price tag and a great goal record in the equivalent of non league football don't make it into my list.
MC Prussian Posted 15 February 2016 Posted 15 February 2016 Having a fancy name, a big price tag and a great goal record in the equivalent of non league football don't make it into my list. Can't be Kramaric, then. You've certainly lifted my spirits now. Because he neither has a fancy name, a particularly or absolutely big price tag to that name nor a great goal record in a league equivalent to non-league football.
Dan Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 Just seen his goal. Oh my days. It's not even his goal. It's an own goal
MC Prussian Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 Just seen his goal. Oh my days. It's not even his goal. It's an own goal Oh no, it wasn't. You've had a 'mare here, Dan.
chapero82 Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 Oh no, it wasn't. You've had a 'mare here, Dan. Does he mean it hits the post then the the keeper to go in? I can't remember just a suggestion do don't shoot me down for it
Bayfox Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 Does he mean it hits the post then the the keeper to go in? I can't remember just a suggestion do don't shoot me down for it I would guess so, hitting the woodwork doesn't count as on target, so he has missed the target, it has hit the keeper and gone in, OG.
Manwell Pablo Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 I would guess so, hitting the woodwork doesn't count as on target, so he has missed the target, it has hit the keeper and gone in, OG. I haven't seen it but it depends on whether it bounces out and hits the keeper or bounces at an angel that would of resulted in it going in off had the keeper not touched it. If it hit the keeper at all, I dunno. It's been given to him anyway, so rightly or wrongly it is his goal.
Bayfox Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 I haven't seen it but it depends on whether it bounces out and hits the keeper or bounces at an angel that would of resulted in it going in off had the keeper not touched it. If it hit the keeper at all, I dunno. It's been given to him anyway, so rightly or wrongly it is his goal. I'm not disputing they awarded him the goal, fine, but it comes off the post and his heading back into play, hits the keepers back on goes in, watched the highlights on ITV4 last night or the night before just to see it and his red card. Silly challenge from a player trying to hard to impress.
MC Prussian Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 Does he mean it hits the post then the the keeper to go in? I can't remember just a suggestion do don't shoot me down for it I've watched the scene again. Clear header from Andrej, keeper parries it slightly, bounces off his fingertips (still towards goal), off his back and off the post into the net. I think it's only fair to fully hand the goal over to Kramaric, because of the ball already moving towards goal after it hits the post. The Bundesliga credited Kramaric with the goal, so that's the end of the discussion, anyway.
Dan Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 I've not had a mare at all. That's an own goal all day for me. It's hit the post and then come back off the keeper. I have no idea how that can't be an own goal.
Brooksy Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 It's definitely an own goal. Poor bloke can't catch a break
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 http://www.footytube.com/video/Werder-Bremen-vs-Hoffenheim-402853?ref=lchan_results I'd say it really should have been classed as an own goal... but no one wants to claim an OG so it will stay as his goal.
Richard Posted 17 February 2016 Posted 17 February 2016 Definite own goal. Wouldn't have gone if it hadn't hit the back of the keeper
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.