foxes_rule1978 Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 We weren't negative at all.A sucker punch as they were throwing everything at us. If there had been only 2 minutes injury time every one would be saying how great we were. Just a shame all the miserable cvnts who were willing us to lose can claim a little success. This,. success for them, England are crap we get it now fog off
lgfualol Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 I just want to know what that ****ing explosion was Rooney sat down
ozleicester Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 That bald twat (andy gray is it?)... is a gobby cockend
foxfanazer Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 We weren't negative at all.A sucker punch as they were throwing everything at us. If there had been only 2 minutes injury time every one would be saying how great we were. Just a shame all the miserable cvnts who were willing us to lose can claim a little success.Oh come on you can't believe that. Why sit on a 1-0 against that side? And you don't think the substitutions were at all negative. Happy for you if thats an acceptable performance and result to you
Corky Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 Vardy would've been the sensible choice, he would've had the chance to get behind their defence and get us forward towards the end. If ever there was a time for him that was it.
Thracian Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 So schoolmaster Hodgson finds himself painfully wanting as a coach. How he contrived to draw that game was a reflection of his tactical blindness. I didn't expect it to happen because Russia were so bad but explained to my wife only five minuttes earlier that Russia posed only one potential threat and that was a cross to one of their big men. But instead of continuing to press, deny the opposing passers time and space and in particular the opportunity to deliver a cross from wide, we conceded the space, allowed the cross and conceded such a predictable one-chance goal. There was a time when Leicester lacked the one great quality needed for success which is ruthlessness and, again, I said to my wife that we could easily pay for the same weakness. And so it turned out. Our only ambition was to get ahead and stay there rather than to get ahead and never let the pressure drop. One day we'll learn but if I'd have been Hodgson I'd have been ashamed and cannot imagine any self-respecting failing to beat that particular Russian side from that position.
yorkie1999 Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 Kane was wank in the last tournament he played in as well.
Donut Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 England fans having to convince themselves they'll be okay against the mighty Wales lol "England have won three tournament games in ten years" You havent played in a tournament for 50 years and youre shit. Thats settled that.
HankMarvin Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 lets not pretend this is the euro champions elect, who actually plays for russia thats rated
adam Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 That was perfect for Vardy. Kane hasn't the pace. Hodgson just shown everyone how negative he is.
ozleicester Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 Fvckin Roy..... Ive Been spoilt by how a good manager acts this year
purpleronnie Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 If we were half as good as Hoddle and Tyldsley thought we were we'd have been 8-0 up by half time. It was embarrassing listening to them, you'd thought we were in the final already, maybe it's something in their contracts? I remember them mentioning how Rooney is so confident in his ability to play himself out of trouble, all he did was whack it up the field 40 yards.
Jimothy Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 We weren't negative at all.A sucker punch as they were throwing everything at us. If there had been only 2 minutes injury time every one would be saying how great we were. Just a shame all the miserable cvnts who were willing us to lose can claim a little success. I didn't think we were great. We played well in that we controlled the game in most parts but created the grand total of **** all, which in the end is what the game is all about. We can't defend, we always give the opposition a chance to score, so we need to utilise our attacking options and win the game. A team that's liable to concede and doesn't create will win nothing.
StanSP Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 I just want to know what that ****ing explosion was just a flare being set off. probably very close to a microphone.
Guest ttfn Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 Vardy would've been the sensible choice, he would've had the chance to get behind their defence and get us forward towards the end. If ever there was a time for him that was it. If he's not going to use him in those circumstances, when is he planning on using him?
Finnegan Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 You havent played in a tournament for 50 years and youre shit. Thats settled that. WE ARE TOP OF THE LEAGUE
ozleicester Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 4-5 spurs players i the side, no wonder we didnt know how to win in the end
foxes21 Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 When we went 1-0 it was so obvious to bring Vardy on. Russia had to go for it which left so many gaps that Vardy would have exploited more than Adam Johnson at a year 9 school disco.
Corky Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 If he's not going to use him in those circumstances, when is he planning on using him? 2-0 down, out on the wing against a strong defence.
ScouseFox Posted 11 June 2016 Posted 11 June 2016 not being funny but if i dont even get the fantasy points from that big ugly defender scoring im lobbing a chair at myself
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.