Number 6 Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 Destined for bigger things. Burnley look on track to stay up but makes sense for them to keep Keane and ensure that they do stay up. He'll leave in them summer for a decent sum to a top 7 team.
FoxyPalace.com Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 18 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: We love assassinating the ITK's on FT. No point being ITK if you are unwilling to share the information. It just generates pages of idle gossip and speculation.
Nick Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 absolutely no assassination intended! Im the first in the queue to defend ITK's and appreciate their input, everybody knows that.... My point is that I have no idea if @themightyfin is a 12 year old child that is an argumentative WUM as I genuinely have no posting familiarity with him whatsoever or is somebody that I should consider as valuing their opinion. All a poster has to say is yeah I have a tenuous connection with someone who works at the club and post in a suggestive way that's defensible but this person just posts statements passed off as fact! I was simply wanted to get a gist of if he was media or club connected. It's weird spending time in the transfer forums all day if you know for a fact who we are and are not interested in already. I've recently worked a bit with professional sports people and organisations - not a lot but a bit and every now and again offer a snippet if I can and it comes my way and many know me on here. I just didn't know anything about this fella and was intrigued - that's all.
SheppyFox Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 22 minutes ago, lgfualol said: why are ITKs so delicate. I appreciate it must be annoying when someone doubts you but come on. I don't know what the correct word is, but they often seem to over react and feign disappearance, I think it's along the lines of needing "oh please come back mr ITK, you're so fantastic for sharing vague and usually inaccurate knowledge with us mere mortal plebs!"
Babylon Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 6 hours ago, bald reynard said: Bentley's GTFox, who posted this, is usually very reliable. He works for the Press Association. I presume that post is sarcastic as GTFox is so full of shit he makes the toilet on train spotting look clean.
Babylon Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 2 hours ago, lgfualol said: why are ITKs so delicate. I appreciate it must be annoying when someone doubts you but come on. Egos are delicate things.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 2 hours ago, FoxyPalace.com said: No point being ITK if you are unwilling to share the information. It just generates pages of idle gossip and speculation. Yeah I wonder who it is? . . . . .
sylofox Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 The mighty fin has a legit source as good as any can be other than CR Rudkin or our owners. Yes he was a little blunt but like anything in text read it how you like. As with any ITK like my topic believe it take it with a pinch is salt or ignore it. No need to round up on the guy. I for one have trust in his info and will always value it. But it seems yet again FT has done it's best and another person that gets some info is not happy to post. Well we will always have the sun and mirror to rely on.
adamlcfcbevo85 Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 3 hours ago, Fox 4 Life said: It's because 95% of them are talking a load of bollocks Some chat shit but most of the time it's jeleousy, every person who replies with a ridiculous comment from someone in the know is more than likely a turd !!!!!!!
hackneyfox Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 1 hour ago, Babylon said: I presume that post is sarcastic as GTFox is so full of shit he makes the toilet on train spotting look clean. There's GTFox and GTIF, you sure you're not getting them confused?
st albans fox Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 Finn got slaughtered in the summer for sharing that NG was going to stay. Pretty well accepted now that this is what the club believed to be the case having said that, I don't think the post from SL was written as to make him take his ball away.
foxoffderby Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 Don't listen to anything on Bentley roof they now nothing. Just a bunch rumour mungers. They've got a massive history on this site of talking shite. Many on that site come here just to be wums
Topman Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 2 hours ago, st albans fox said: Finn got slaughtered in the summer for sharing that NG was going to stay. Pretty well accepted now that this is what the club believed to be the case having said that, I don't think the post from SL was written as to make him take his ball away. Who is NG? Sorry having a blank moment trying to think
MPH Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 Got to defend @Swan Lesta on this one. He's not said anything wrong. if I have 8 people in a row at work stick the knife in, I'm likely to interpret the next persons remarks in the same way and I think that's what's happened here...
AKCJ Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 14 minutes ago, Topman said: Who is NG? Sorry having a blank moment trying to think NG is what the players and coaching staff nicknamed N'golo Kante.
Babylon Posted 21 January 2017 Posted 21 January 2017 4 hours ago, hackneyfox said: There's GTFox and GTIF, you sure you're not getting them confused? Which one says "buckin"?
Ian Nacho Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 I can't see this happening. As it stands Burnley are more likely to stay up than us at the moment so I can't see him leaving for us. If he did leave I'd expect him to go to a top 6 club.
Tielemans63 Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 According to a few of the Sunday papers, Man City are keen on Keane too. If that's the case then we'll be needing to look elsewhere.
Tielemans63 Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 Oops. Double Post. Here's a picture of Rab Douglas:
Nick Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 16 hours ago, sylofox said: The mighty fin has a legit source as good as any can be other than CR Rudkin or our owners. Yes he was a little blunt but like anything in text read it how you like. As with any ITK like my topic believe it take it with a pinch is salt or ignore it. No need to round up on the guy. I for one have trust in his info and will always value it. But it seems yet again FT has done it's best and another person that gets some info is not happy to post. Well we will always have the sun and mirror to rely on. Nobody 'rounded up on anybody' when I post something and somebody says that I'm wrong as a statement of fact I'm entitled to wonder who they are and ask why. This all really is shit, boring, oversensitive, shambles of a drama. If I call you out or have a go - you tend to know about it (there's not a lot of ambiguity in my writing) - I've done no such thing in this instance until perhaps now.... I always value ITK's and have always challenged anybody that had a go at them. But seriously if you can't ask a question without somebody taking offence, then the moral high ground, then dramatically exiting the forum, then hovering over the ITK thread for hours waiting for pleads of adoration, Rep points and don't go statements to then start posting info again once they've had their ego stroked then you need to be a tad thicker skinned if you going to put yourself out there and write as an ITK. So @themightyfin I meant no offence wish you well, am grateful for anything you are able to provide foxestalk and am excited for any snippets of info that may come in the future. Respectfully however I owe you no apology you need to be a little less sensitive.
themightyfin Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 1 minute ago, Swan Lesta said: Nobody 'rounded up on anybody' when I post something and somebody says that I'm wrong as a statement of fact I'm entitled to wonder who they are and ask why. This all really is shit, boring, oversensitive, shambles of a drama. If I call you out or have a go - you tend to know about it (there's not a lot of ambiguity in my writing) - I've done no such thing in this instance until perhaps now.... I always value ITK's and have always challenged anybody that had a go at them. But seriously if you can't ask a question without somebody taking offence, then the moral high ground, then dramatically exiting the forum, then hovering over the ITK thread for hours waiting for pleads of adoration, Rep points and don't go statements to then start posting info again once they've had their ego stroked then you need to be a tad thicker skinned if you going to put yourself out there and write as an ITK. So @themightyfin I meant no offence wish you well, am grateful for anything you are able to provide foxestalk and am excited for any snippets of info that may come in the future. Respectfully however I owe you no apology you need to be a little less sensitive. I asked for an apology? Show me where? And waited for pleads of adoration? I went offline for a few hours as I do have other things to do if that's ok?
Nick Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 5 minutes ago, themightyfin said: I asked for an apology? Show me where? And waited for pleads of adoration? I went offline for a few hours as I do have other things to do if that's ok?
hackneyfox Posted 22 January 2017 Posted 22 January 2017 13 hours ago, Babylon said: Which one says "buckin"? GTIF
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.