st albans fox Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 It's been said that he has agreed personal terms its also been said that he has agreed a salary reduction to go there i suspect that means he gets a chunky s/o fee to compensate which may be the reason they can't afford to give us the kind of fee we need. If so, Riyad needs to make his mind up as what's more important - champions league football or his bank balance!
Bakey Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 33 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said: Roma sold Salah for 37 Million rising to 43 Million. Sorry but I guess it would take a bid off something like that to get him. I doubt Roma can afford him but we shall see. Bid declined incoming without a doubt. They also just received 34 mil for rudiger so they have got plenty of cash
Ted Maul Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 The info might be true, and Roma might have upped their bid to £27m. They can f**k right off if they think we're accepting it though
Ashley Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Monchi who is Roma DoF is pretty special in terms of transfers. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.squawka.com/news/13-players-sevillas-director-monchi-bought-for-peanuts-and-sold-for-miliions/683279%3Famp-on Well worth a read
crisp packet Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Many many clubs supposedly watching developments , so why would u except a low bid? Shaky says he wants him to stay? So unless he starts being a nuisance? Pay or hell stay? But we really need a cut off point on this ,as we will have a mahrez type hole this year ....
Ashley Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 9 hours ago, WigstonWanderer said: Didn't Liverpool have to back off recently though after Soton complained? They did. First instance im aware of regarding something like that mate
Tuna Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Roma have some balls to sell Salah for 45 and try and get Riyad for 27. Stump up the cash or get in the bin mate.
Netflix & Chillwell Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Apparently Romas new boss comes from sassuolo and is more interested in bringing in berardi from his old club who plays in the same position as Riyad for a cheaper price. He likes to play 4-3-3 counter attacking football and mahrez/Berardi would be perfect replacement for Salah so this Ones 50/50
Babylon Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 12 minutes ago, Ashley said: They did. First instance im aware of regarding something like that mate They'd been calling, texting, flying the player around to meet the manager! That's taking the piss ha
FoxyPalace.com Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 1 hour ago, Bakey said: They also just received 34 mil for rudiger so they have got plenty of cash True but I still do not see them banging out 40 Million on Mahrez.
Babylon Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Sensible stuff from Top... https://m.sportskeeda.com/amp/football/leicester-vice-president-insists-there-is-no-real-offer-for-mahrez
Wymsey Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 If any bid is in the region of £20m, it should contain something like £30m in add-ons and more in bonuses if he achieves something elsewhere.
crisp packet Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Love our owners https://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/leicester-vice-president-insists-there-no-real-offer-mahrez edit - same as babs above , different click bate
KFS Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Good to hear from Top, but that's a completely different media stance than Shakey. Weird.
Bluetintedspecs Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 6 minutes ago, Babylon said: Sensible stuff from Top... https://m.sportskeeda.com/amp/football/leicester-vice-president-insists-t, here-is-no-real-offer-for-mahrez Sensible , shrewd and poker face firmly put on, good man !
Max Power Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Excellent stance from Top. I'm far more confident now.
Lesta Legend Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Yep the low ball 20 / 30 million bids are clearly not what they value the player at and won't even consider - great to hear. But also he is insistent that it is Mahrez that needs get on with his job should we not receive the bids we deserve. Good on Top.
chapero82 Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 13 minutes ago, crisp packet said: Love our owners https://www.fourfourtwo.com/news/leicester-vice-president-insists-there-no-real-offer-mahrez edit - same as babs above , different click bate Also the Iheanacho comment is a strange one it sounds like it's still Man City holding the situation up!
Wymsey Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 Just now, chapero82 said: Also the Iheanacho comment is a strange one it sounds like it's still Man City holding the situation up! Maybe with rumours Aguero could be set to leave by some, they're reluctant to sell Iheanacho until Aguero's situation is resolved?
crisp packet Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 5 minutes ago, chapero82 said: Also the Iheanacho comment is a strange one it sounds like it's still Man City holding the situation up! Think that should be sorted when we return from Thailand.. hopefully? pep said within the next 10 days , days ago so?
adam95581 Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 That's great from Top. We are seriously lucky to have the owners we do especially when you look at the likes of Hull/Watford/Leeds etc. The list goes on.
sylofox Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 14 minutes ago, chapero82 said: Also the Iheanacho comment is a strange one it sounds like it's still Man City holding the situation up! Or the fact man c are in the states and we are in Hong Kong is making it a little harder to complete the deal.
Guest Cujek Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 56 minutes ago, Netflix & Chillwell said: Apparently Romas new boss comes from sassuolo and is more interested in bringing in berardi from his old club who plays in the same position as Riyad for a cheaper price. He likes to play 4-3-3 counter attacking football and mahrez/Berardi would be perfect replacement for Salah so this Ones 50/50 All transfers are 50/50 they either stay or go. Although the likely good of them signing Mahrez for under 40 million is about 0.
fleckneymike Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 The final sentence by Top is key "You have to consider his value at the moment he left, and value of his replacement accordingly. I can't see a player like Mahrez or a decent replacement in the market right now." why sell someone you cant replace?
sphericalfox Posted 22 July 2017 Posted 22 July 2017 6 minutes ago, fleckneymike said: The final sentence by Top is key "You have to consider his value at the moment he left, and value of his replacement accordingly. I can't see a player like Mahrez or a decent replacement in the market right now." why sell someone you cant replace? Or it's an admission that we've looked and tried to find a decent calibre player should we sell Mahrez and we've not been able to attract them. Or alternatively - pay up or **** off, we'll need that money to buy a replacement in.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.