Foxxed Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 40 pages! He best come, and he best be our missing attacking link in midfield. Nacho and Ndidi. Make it happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 4 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Are we calling Belial Belly now? I remember that becoming Gerry Taggart's song back in the day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nod.E Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 If this happens it would feel similar to when Lukaku left Chelsea for Everton. He can be that big for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 4 hours ago, Marutimon said: The only thing Jesus has ahead of Nacho is a full season of first team football. He's been playing much worse under Guardiola, even regressed, lost his self-belief (what do you expect if you score and assist vs Manchester United then get hauled off after 60 minutes and benched for over a month?). Pep's man-management with Iheanacho has been absolutely dreadful. Iheanacho is a different type of player, but his goalscoring stats are insane. Jesus never had those kind of stats in Brazil. I thinks you guys are massively underrating how big his potential is. He was higher rated than Rashford just a year ago, but Rashford is a starter, while Iheanacho couldn't even start games for Man City, despite scoring 4 goals and having 3 assists in 293 minutes of football by the end of October (that's a goal or assist every 42 minutes). Despite that Iheanacho failed to play a single minute of football for an entire month (November), after which suddenly he was thrown off the deep end when he became Man City's only striker. Naturally he was rusty, but still scored a goal on his first start in over a month... The one below: And still Pep was unsatisfied and showed him no faith. He got one more chance to prove himself - the loss vs LCFC. Pep gave him 58 minutes and its as if he was blamed for the poor showing. After that he barely saw the ball again... Sure, he's not as dynamic as Jesus, but he's much more intelligent, has a better passing range, better vision and furthermore is a threat with a longshot (not to mention his finishing is as cool as it gets). He just needs a chance to play to his strengths and Leicester affords him that. He's also been played out of position, being forced as a centre forward, while he's obviously best suited as a second striker or attacking midfielder. If he is a success, we get our pants pulled down in two years. If he isn't, we get them pulled down now. There is little point taking this deal on with a buy back clause, we should just look elsewhere. Buyback clauses could well be the thing that kills football, it's stopping the smaller clubs even making a transfer profit now. Tell them to get fùcked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Not physically though. That would be weird. He's not quite the Lukaku unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claridge Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Saw the lcfc helicopter over Cosby at 5pm.not sure that means anything, but might be club officials , medical team or top going Cosby chippy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livid Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Any chance we have a backup just in case this doesn't happen? Just asking for for a friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadt Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Seems exactly what we need, creative and scores. I'd rather not have the buyback clause but if it's a case of no buyback clause, no Iheanacho then we'll have to put up with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxinNotts Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 I have a feeling this is a done deal now. Hope I'm right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 56 minutes ago, Nod.E said: If this happens it would feel similar to when Lukaku left Chelsea for Everton. He can be that big for us. Exactly why I don't want that buyback clause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 55 minutes ago, Claridge said: Saw the lcfc helicopter over Cosby at 5pm.not sure that means anything, but might be club officials , medical team or top going Cosby chippy I can confirm it was the latter and that he had mushy peas with a chip cob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wymsey Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Just now, st albans fox said: I can confirm it was the latter and that he had mushy peas with a chip cob Sauce? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 3 minutes ago, st albans fox said: I can confirm it was the latter and that he had mushy peas with a chip cob Was it peas wet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 2 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said: Sauce? Bangkok of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOXSE Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 A buy back clause is fine by me and if he turns out to be great, us only getting an extra £10 million is fine..... But, this is a 2-way street: As long as if he turns out to be sh*t we get £10m refund, no problem! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 3 minutes ago, FOXSE said: A buy back clause is fine by me and if he turns out to be great, us only getting an extra £10 million is fine..... But, this is a 2-way street: As long as if he turns out to be sh*t we get £10m refund, no problem! How do you define sh1t ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livid Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 8 minutes ago, st albans fox said: How do you define sh1t ? Musa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozartfox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 15 minutes ago, st albans fox said: How do you define sh1t ? D-E-R-B-Y. C-U-N-T-Y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOXSE Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 19 minutes ago, st albans fox said: How do you define sh1t ? Foxestalk poll should be made binding in the contract! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunyip Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Good grief children , ever heard of the the old adage if you have nothing to say best not say anything at all ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kinowe Soorie Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 Better to have loved and lost, than not loved at all. He is D E C E N T!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 43 minutes ago, Bunyip said: Good grief children , ever heard of the the old adage if you have nothing to say best not say anything at all ? Great song by Ronan Keating that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desertfox2 Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 1 hour ago, Wymeswold fox said: Sauce? Tartar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 1 hour ago, Costock_Fox said: Great song by Ronan Keating that. Or as I prefer to call it, the "Shut Up, Woman!" song. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costock_Fox Posted 24 June 2017 Share Posted 24 June 2017 8 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Or as I prefer to call it, the "Shut Up, Woman!" song. Bet that sets the mrs off . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.