Strokes Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 4 hours ago, st albans fox said: I suspect deano's policy renewal would be covered by a Sunday morning bring and buy sale !! not really comparing eggs with eggs and i assume dean is still registered to play by the English FA. Think more the case case of someone being injured by him in training. The insurance company with riyad's policy would refuse to pay if silva ended his career via an unfortunate training ground accident. Why would anyone compare eggs with eggs? It's not the tigers forum.
mozartfox Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 Still no up date from the Club then? The communications team need to do. some communicating
Strokes Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 3 minutes ago, mozartfox said: Still no up date from the Club then? The communications team need to do. some communicating They'll probably update us, when there is an update.
deep blue Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 41 minutes ago, Snik-Snok said: .... The only outcomes I can see is either a or b above. Restraint of trade is a non-argument because once this is resolved, he will be employed, and being paid, either by Sporting or LCFC. In that respect, it's no different to a player being at a club but being omitted from the squad list, like Benalouane in the first half of last season. ... But there is a difference, in that LCFC had the option whether to include Benalouane or not. Here, LCFC have no input; Silva is prevented by FIFA from any playing involvement. The fact that he is being paid is surely not enough; he is being prevented from pursuing his profession in full.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 36 minutes ago, Strokes said: Why would anyone compare eggs with eggs? It's not the tigers forum. Because comparing balls with balls is opening a whole new can of worms.
VLC86 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 Haven't argued with anyone on here for a few days, if anyone wants a row let me know.
PaulW Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 52 minutes ago, mozartfox said: Still no up date from the Club then? The communications team need to do. some communicating The owners know far better than to air complex legal arguments in public.
weller54 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 9 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: Haven't argued with anyone on here for a few days, if anyone wants a row let me know. What a load of rubbish!! You don't want an argument!......
VLC86 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 Just now, weller54 said: What a load of rubbish!! You don't want an argument!...... this thread genuinely has me ragging every time I read part of it. Complete Groundhog Day scenario.
mozartfox Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 5 minutes ago, PaulW said: The owners know far better than to air complex legal arguments in public. They are not legal arguments, they are regulatory issues with FIFA, who have no legal jurisdiction over anything.
turtmcfly Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 14 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: Haven't argued with anyone on here for a few days, if anyone wants a row let me know. Matthew Pinsent?
Snik-Snok Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 24 minutes ago, deep blue said: But there is a difference, in that LCFC had the option whether to include Benalouane or not. Here, LCFC have no input; Silva is prevented by FIFA from any playing involvement. The fact that he is being paid is surely not enough; he is being prevented from pursuing his profession in full. FIFA are not preventing his involvement. It's our failure to comply to the rules that have prevented his involvement. We are governed by the FA, who in turn are under the jurisdiction of FIFA. Therefore, we need to adhere to the rules and regulations of those organisations. If we opt to omit a player from our squad list, that's our responsibility. If, for whatever reason (whether it be waiting for confirmation of Drinkwater's transfer, waiting for the results of Silva's medical, waiting for a fax from Portugal, late haggling over the payment structure of the transfer fee), we left it late, it's still our responsibility to submit the information to FIFA's system prior to the deadline. It's not FIFA's fault we did this late. They cannot allow a late submission because it was only a few seconds late, as that will leave them open to all sorts of potential problems going forward. We would have to prove there were mitigating circumstances outside our control, which I'm still hoping we can find. The problem here is that that the FA have appear to have processed a transfer despite it being submitted late, but FIFA have failed to sanction the registration as it was beyond a deadline which the FA seemed to allow a bit of leniency on. Therefore if anything this could evolve into a dispute between the FA and FIFA, as perhaps the FA allowed something to be processed which it shouldn't have done.
joachim1965 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 1 hour ago, Costock_Fox said: this thread genuinely has me ragging every time I read part of it. Complete Groundhog Day scenario. Ragging ?
Sampson Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 6 minutes ago, joachim1965 said: Ragging ? It's how Scooby Doo talks about having sex.
SecretPro Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 29 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: this thread genuinely has me ragging every time I read part of it. Complete Groundhog Day scenario. What is 'ragging' you fat tosser? C'mon then!
VLC86 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 At this point I could blame autocorrect or I could just disappear into the backround.... see ya.
SecretPro Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 4 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: At this point I could blame autocorrect or I could just disappear into the backround.... see ya. Yeah, Jog on Scoobs
onekeithweller Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 39 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: this thread genuinely has me ragging every time I read part of it. Complete Groundhog Day scenario. You can say that again.
Mullet1 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 Well.............Drinkwater is injured with a calf problem
SCP4Ever Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 21 hours ago, The Guvnor said: You would think the sensible thing to do from both parties would be nullify this feckin transfer for the players sake, on the premise that not having international clearance will have severe detrimental consequences for the most important party, the player, have a mutual agreement that the player is signed in Jan, same terms, Silva get's game time, doesn't affect his WC chances, everyone's happy including FIFA. It wouldn't change anything. The transfer is complete, the problem is the player registration in the FA and the PL. And with the windows now closed, he cannot join any other club. Besides, if he plays for another club, he won't be allowed to play of Leicester come January, because he's already played for Sporting and you can only play for a maximum of 2 clubs per season. The not training thing is weird, but considering he had an injury (broken rib), he would probably miss a few days anyway. If it's more than that, it's too strange.
les-tah Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 13 minutes ago, Mullet1 said: Well.............Drinkwater is injured with a calf problem calf rot? similar to how delphs body has rotted on man citys bench.
enmac Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 Proof of sending it on time should be the deciding factor. Who knows if their server or network crashed or not for a few minutes or seconds due to the heavy load of deadline transactions.I thought the same as you until I read this article which refers to an electronic device which records "exact timings." No idea what this device is. Does any one know?https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/sep/06/leicester-press-fifa-to-enable-adrien-silva-move-from-sporting-lisbonSent from my Fusion5_108 (16GB) using Tapatalk
VLC86 Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 2 hours ago, turtmcfly said: Matthew Pinsent? I am in oar of your humour. Everything crossed I've used the right spelling of that .
Innovindil Posted 11 September 2017 Posted 11 September 2017 5 minutes ago, enmac said: I thought the same as you until I read this article which refers to an electronic device which records "exact timings." No idea what this device is. Does any one know?https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/sep/06/leicester-press-fifa-to-enable-adrien-silva-move-from-sporting-lisbon Sent from my Fusion5_108 (16GB) using Tapatalk Gonna have a stab in the dark wild guess... ... A clock?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.