Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
bovril

Unpopular Opinions You Hold

By bovril, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted

One goal of his that isn't really spoken about was an absolute thunderbastard against Sunderland- left footer drilled into the roof of the net from the edge of the box.

Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
Posted

My favourite Vardy goals are probably the more innovative ones. The Back heel flicks against Man City and Germany (?) were both sublime. 

 

The flying Daniel-san crane volley against Tottenham was frankly ridiculous. 

 

He's also had impressive headed goals, near post headers etc that showed his versatility (not Burnley though lololol) 

 

He's always had the unexpected in his locker because he's just SUCH. A. NATURAL. FINISHER (#fvckoffmichaelowen) 

  • Like 2
Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted

Love all of the goals mentioned. However, his most important goal (for me) was Middlesbrough away the first game of the championship winning season. His first touch looked like he over ran it but his pace allowed him to get it. That goal must’ve done his confidence the world of good. Had it not gone in (all ifs and buts) maybe we wouldn’t have had the legend we now have. 

Jon the Hat

Jon the Hat

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, BenTheFox said:

Are you able to provide evidence of this? I am only aware of the settlement in 1994 after the family first filed a civil lawsuit which came before a criminal trial that never took place (it usually works the other way!). 

 

I fully understand how people can believe that Michael Jackson is guilty, personally I'm on the fence. However, my point is, if this is the ground-breaking testimony that is supposed to convince the world of his guilt, then it warrants necessary scrutiny. The bottom line is, both men lied under oath, one of them claimed to have been abused in a building which hadn't been built at a time when he claimed that the abuse had occurred and by the time that it had been built, he was sixteen years-old and had also claimed that by this point Jackson had 'kicked him to the curb'. The other claimed to have been abused while his family went to the Grand Canyon, although his mother testified that the whole family including him went to the Grand Canyon. This same accuser also tried to get a job directing a production about Michael Jackson and spoke glowingly of his influence not just in music but on his personal life only a year before first coming forward with these allegations. We are only scratching the surface here!

 

In a hypothetical scenario where this made its way to a criminal trial, any defence attorney worth their salt would tear them to pieces and subsequently, any reasonable jury would have no choice but to acquit. 

 

They were kids being abused, they are inevitably going to have issues recalling the details, especially as they spent a lot of time with him in a lot of different places.  You are also dismissing the level of influence he had over them which may have led to them lying to protect him. 

 

I also find it hard to see the benefit they would get from lying now?  Why would they put themselves in the limelight like this?

BenTheFox

BenTheFox

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Jon the Hat said:

They were kids being abused, they are inevitably going to have issues recalling the details, especially as they spent a lot of time with him in a lot of different places.  You are also dismissing the level of influence he had over them which may have led to them lying to protect him. 

 

I also find it hard to see the benefit they would get from lying now?  Why would they put themselves in the limelight like this?

There is potentially a large amount of money involved here. 

 

Wade Robson was in a very difficult position financially in the early 10s. Having failed to get the job directing the Cirque du Soleil production about Michael Jackson, he then tried publishing a book which was unsuccessful and a couple of months later came forward with these allegations and tried to sue the Jackson estate thinking they would settle to keep him quiet, which they didn't. It's also worth mentioning that the suits that were filed were dismissed by the courts and the appeals were also dismissed earlier this year. 

  • Popular Post
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

People who defend Michael Jackson are the same kind of people who will tell you Bill Gates puts microchips into vaccines.

 

You don’t debate these folks, you ignore them and hope they win a Darwin Award.

  • Like 5
Rob1742

Rob1742

Posted
Posted
On 14/11/2021 at 10:55, Voll Blau said:

Perhaps you'd like to enlighten us as to the better system of government you'd put in place instead then?

Protests and marches to show those in power that we aren’t happy with the system.

 

I just can’t understand voting for something that is currently broken. The Boris Bus just shows they are taking us for fools, and it’s time we didn’t accept it.

 

But the other side is just as bad. 

kenny

kenny

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, LiberalFox said:

That Leicester City finishing a league season in the mid table wouldn't be a terrible event for the club necessitating wholesale changes in the playing and managerial staff. 

As long as we win a cup along the way presumably?

tom27111

tom27111

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LiberalFox said:

That Leicester City finishing a league season in the mid table wouldn't be a terrible event for the club necessitating wholesale changes in the playing and managerial staff. 

 

True.

 

But it means it's inevitable that players such as Tielemans, Ndidi and Fofana will move on.

 

That's what I don't like.

 

If only we'd got across the line in the last 2 years.

  • Like 2
HighPeakFox

HighPeakFox

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, BenTheFox said:

I'll sing it, because at the minute I'm happy for any songs to go around, but Vichai had a dream is an absolute shocker. 

It requires a spurious mention of the size of manhood to be complete. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...