Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Simi

FIFA reject Adrien Silva appeal

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, notnow john said:

I'm impressed what you have achieved with crayons and panini stickers?

Im surprised at Amarty stats although a lot of his passes are backwards with little risk.

Maybe you're right two athletes and a footballer could be an answer.

Any yet he manages to have the most key passes and most chances created? I'm not suggesting the bloke is Pirlo, but he's actually pretty good at keeping the ball and doing something with it when the chance arises.

Guest Cujek
Posted
12 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said:

Everyone else has so why does it matter!

They reported it straight to sky sports news, dont seem very professional to me.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

Not really, I tend to be proved right most of the time.

Aaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. In your own head maybe.

Posted

Well that's bloody crap news! FIFA were never going to do the "right" thing! Twats.

 

Question is, how do we cope until January without him. 

 

We need to switch to 3 in midfield but I'm concerned that King just doesn't add enough in the Centre, even in a 3. 

 

Still think our best formation will be this:

 

-----------------------Kasper--------------------------

Simpson-------Wes--------Maguire------Fuchs

------------------N'didi-------Iborra----------------

---Mahrez----------Iheanacho----------Gray----

--------------------------Vardy------------------------

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

No, because that's the rules.

Exactly. If this was another club, or a club someone didn't like, they'd be all over the "OH WELL THEY'VE SET A PRECEDENT NOW" angle, and "brown envelopes handed over there" accusations. But because it's against us it's petty old FIFA.

Posted
1 minute ago, Kitchandro said:

No, because that's the rules.

I know, but there is a time for our wonderful self appointed governing body to see the bigger picture, to consider a player's career, to see the injustice of a 4 month ban for 14 second delay to use some common sense.  Law courts can take mitigating factors into account and use their judgement even if the precious rules are broken.  It is too much to ask of living dead at FIFA though.  

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, CityFan 06 said:

Up until now I've been thinking we ought to change shape/formation at least until Silva signs; who would possibly be able to make 4-4-2 work again. Now he's not signing, I think we need to be looking at a different shape. 

Pear shaped?

Posted
2 minutes ago, STUHILL said:

Well that's bloody crap news! FIFA were never going to do the "right" thing! Twats.

 

Question is, how do we cope until January without him. 

 

We need to switch to 3 in midfield but I'm concerned that King just doesn't add enough in the Centre, even in a 3. 

 

Still think our best formation will be this:

 

-----------------------Kasper--------------------------

Simpson-------Wes--------Maguire------Fuchs

------------------N'didi-------Iborra----------------

---Mahrez----------Iheanacho----------Gray----

--------------------------Vardy------------------------

 

The way Fuchs played against Bournemouth I'd be happy to chuck Chilwell in there.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

People blaming FIFA look like children. 

 

This is is a multi billion pound business. A deadline is a deadline.   FIFA, for once, actually played by the rules.

 

It's our failure. Why has it even come down to rushing at the deadline anyway? No professional outfit would do that.

 

My other thought is the owners are arguably at fault even more than Rudkin. If the club wanted to sell Drinkwater before getting Silva then that is most likely to be a financial decision, and that's Vichai's call. Rudkin's job isn't to manage the club's finances, as far as I understand it.

 

The owners are getting tight and probably insisted on waiting. If Rudkin was at fault, it will be because he failed to advise that this was too risky a strategy and, if he had the authority, to cancel both deals.

 

Drinkwater should still be here because we weren't prepared for his departure. That's the bottom line.

Good points, would be nice though to know who/what/how details of the whole affair.....

 

Before it starts..this cant be put down for any excuses for a poor season.CS has to get his tactics right, and play the right players in the right positions, and give that team 3 midfielders, and not good Players wasted  in square holes...

Posted
15 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

My other thought is the owners are arguably at fault even more than Rudkin. If the club wanted to sell Drinkwater before getting Silva then that is most likely to be a financial decision, and that's Vichai's call. Rudkin's job isn't to manage the club's finances, as far as I understand it.

 

The owners are getting tight and probably insisted on waiting. If Rudkin was at fault, it will be because he failed to advise that this was too risky a strategy and, if he had the authority, to cancel both deals.

 

Drinkwater should still be here because we weren't prepared for his departure. That's the bottom line.

I might more be a case of not wanting to sign him early because of FFP, with the club needing to move a player out if one came in. If the Drinkwater deal fell through after we sign Silva then we may have been sailing close to the wind for expenditure, who knows?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Babylon said:

The way Fuchs played against Bournemouth I'd be happy to chuck Chilwell in there.

Chilwell and Gray seem to have a decent understanding so I would be OK with that too. 

 

I also like the idea of having Albrighton and Slimani to come off the bench as a plan B and getting the ball out wide and peppering the box with crosses. 

Posted

Whoever is to blame in this pantomime,the one person who is blameless

is receiving the heaviest punishment.

Thats where it is the most unjust and I hope he sues the arse off all of them!

Posted
12 minutes ago, Babylon said:

Aaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. In your own head maybe.

No no no, in reality.

 

Your problem is you're unable to think objectively, that's what made you stick up for Sousa, Sven, Shakespeare and Rudkin in the past when it was clear to people like me that they weren't good enough. Which was subsequently proved and now accepted by yourself.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Vestan Pance said:

I might more be a case of not wanting to sign him early because of FFP, with the club needing to move a player out if one came in. If the Drinkwater deal fell through after we sign Silva then we may have been sailing close to the wind for expenditure, who knows?

But what I'm saying is, if that is the case, and there was even a small risk that one of the deals might fall through, we should have pulled the plug on both of them.

Guest Cujek
Posted
16 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Rudders probably knew last week but hasn't told anyone yet .....

Hardly. i would expect he is as miffed as us.

Posted
Just now, Kitchandro said:

No no no, in reality.

 

Your problem is you're unable to think objectively, that's what made you stick up for Sousa, Sven, Shakespeare and Rudkin in the past when it was clear to people like me that they weren't good enough. Which was subsequently proved and now accepted by yourself.

The fook are you talking about, you can't just make a load of stuff up and pass it off as fact!

Posted
Just now, Babylon said:

The fook are you talking about, you can't just make a load of stuff up and pass it off as fact!

It's a fact you stuck up for all of them when they were getting a barrage of (warranted) criticism. If I cared enough to actually trawl through several years of posts I'd be able to find them.

 

Like most people on this forum, it takes you a long while but eventually you end up agreeing with me. The same thing will happen with Amartey, if he ever gets a chance to further prove how rubbish he is at passing the ball.

Posted

I tried to give people realistic expectations, sorry guys I was right.

 

Interesting we have apparently not upheld our part of the transfer deal as well as we have not made any payments for the player yet.

Posted
Just now, Kitchandro said:

Like most people on this forum, it takes you a long while but eventually you end up agreeing with me

Well congratulations on being ridiculously deluded.

 

Just now, Kitchandro said:

It's a fact you stuck up for all of them when they were getting a barrage of (warranted) criticism. If I cared enough to actually trawl through several years of posts I'd be able to find them.


No, I stick up for people against over the top stuff and always will do. My view point has been and always will be managers need to be given time and I will stick to that. Did I ever say any one of them was a great manager and people were wrong? No.

 

Posted
52 minutes ago, Babylon said:

Glad you disagree, because that's a sure sign I'm right.

 

 

Screen Shot 2017-10-04 at 14.36.49.png

Arise Sir Daniel Amartey , The Savour, The Ghanian Prince

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...