Name a better option than puel

[MC Prussian]

22 minutes ago, Callabinho said:

No one will leave their current post for us, as they will be well aware that even the shortest of bad runs puts them at serious risk of getting the sack. Plus there’s no way Puel will get the sack because he’s laid out a long term plan for the owners, they’re business people and will more than likely allow him to put that plan into practice, if things aren’t going as he foresaw POST summer transfer window, they will re-assess. So I’d delete all of the threads polls and such, as there’s absolutely no evidence to suggest that the owners are entertaining sacking him. 

We're hardly the only club in that situation.

 

What bugs me no end is that Puel starts talking about his "long-term plans" and "visions", but makes that on the back of four wins in 17 matches and no home win since late January.

To me, that's absolutely no position of strength to argue from and reeks of delusion to some extent.

[m4DD0gg]

Neil Lennon backed by some actual money.

[Soar Fox]

6 minutes ago, m4DD0gg said:

Neil Lennon backed by some actual money.

Please god no.

[Donut]

54 minutes ago, m4DD0gg said:

Neil Lennon backed by some actual money.

I think youre confused.

 

The thread title was "name an option better than Puel"

[CosbehFox]

7 hours ago, m4DD0gg said:

Neil Lennon backed by some actual money.

???

[Tuna]

7 hours ago, m4DD0gg said:

Neil Lennon backed by some actual money.

Legend he may be here, but no, absolutely not.

[Guest]

I can understand why you'd want Puel gone. I can not understand why the **** you'd want to replace him with Neil Lennon, of all people. Might actually be the most stupid thing I've ever read

[fairbanksh]

Feel very underwhelmed 're Puel

Vision is one thing but results speak for themselves 

Unfortunately in no way trust Rudkin and co to have the competence and experience to find a better fit

Not good

[chicagofox]

18 hours ago, Callabinho said:

No one will leave their current post for us, as they will be well aware that even the shortest of bad runs puts them at serious risk of getting the sack. Plus there’s no way Puel will get the sack because he’s laid out a long term plan for the owners, they’re business people and will more than likely allow him to put that plan into practice, if things aren’t going as he foresaw POST summer transfer window, they will re-assess. So I’d delete all of the threads polls and such, as there’s absolutely no evidence to suggest that the owners are entertaining sacking him. 

There’s so much certainly in your post. Do you know the owners personally? Have they told you what their plans are?

[mozartfox]

17 hours ago, m4DD0gg said:

Neil Lennon backed by some actual money.

Would prefer Julian Lennon and Yoko Ono.  

[BenTheFox]

All the names that have been mentioned on here as alternatives to Puel whether they be Benitez, Wagner, Dyche, Hughton, Howe etc. have all needed time to build what they wanted to at their respective clubs. Why would they want to come here if they're under pressure at the slightest hint of a bad run? You tell me.

[ramaiya2]

Nigel Pearson anyone? (without his son)

 

What about bringing Claudio Ranieri, heard he was at the Emirates yesterday

 

Don't think Rafa will come.

[ramaiya2]

Mahrez will go in the summer,

 

We are currently playing S***, Just don't have any confidence in Peul

 

Relegation contenders for next season unless something changes. Just don't want to wait until December before we sack and start looking for someone else. 

 

 

[ZeGuy]

15 minutes ago, ramaiya2 said:

Nigel Pearson anyone? (without his son)

 

What about bringing Claudio Ranieri, heard he was at the Emirates yesterday

 

Don't think Rafa will come.

[Foxxed]

On 22/04/2018 at 01:03, BenTheFox said:

I've heard that we've been interested in him in the past. 

I thought he seemed a decent shot after we sacked Craig. I don't think he'll come though: the club and team respect him, he's had enough time to build his kind of team, he'll have more money next season and if sack Puel he'll probably see Leicester has a huge risk of going the same way as Claudio, Craig and Claude. Stay with those who respect him and will give him more money or leave for what'll likely be a 8 month job?

[Foxxed]

On 20/04/2018 at 14:15, Johnthefoxrayner said:

I can't understand why some others you would want to get rid of Puel,

Dull football? (I want to give Puel until Christmas to give us attacking football for the record.)

[mozartfox]

1 hour ago, BenTheFox said:

All the names that have been mentioned on here as alternatives to Puel whether they be Benitez, Wagner, Dyche, Hughton, Howe etc. have all needed time to build what they wanted to at their respective clubs. Why would they want to come here if they're under pressure at the slightest hint of a bad run? You tell me.

FT would have  ‘Polled’ to get rid of Fergie had been our manager back in his first year at Manure.  This continual habit of calling for the managers head if we do not win 10 games in a row and play like Barca every game, is not really conducive to building a team that can seriously challenge for domestic cup honours and a respectable league position.

 

Puel only signed one signed one of this lot.  Is it he or the players that are letting us down at the moment? 

 

[Foxxed]

1 hour ago, mozartfox said:

Puel only signed one signed one of this lot.  Is it he or the players that are letting us down at the moment? 

 

I'm not sure it's ever that binary. I get the feeling the players who are unsuited to his football will be very difficult to deal with, and perhaps detrimental to team motivation. That said, he is the manager, and he doesn't just manage the tactics, but he manages the players, including those who aren't in his plans. I agree about needing to give him time to build a team though, in the hope we build some exciting football too.

[Leicesterpool]

Would anyway thing Jurgen Klinsmann deserves a go in the premier league? Surprised he's not been linked to more jobs.

 

At least the players would be able to understand him...

 

 

Edited 23 April 2018 by Leicesterpool

[MC Prussian]

1 hour ago, mozartfox said:

FT would have  ‘Polled’ to get rid of Fergie had been our manager back in his first year at Manure.  This continual habit of calling for the managers head if we do not win 10 games in a row and play like Barca every game, is not really conducive to building a team that can seriously challenge for domestic cup honours and a respectable league position.

 

Puel only signed one signed one of this lot.  Is it he or the players that are letting us down at the moment? 

 

How many people are actually asking the team to win ten games in a row? 

And who is really expecting us to play "like Barcelona every game"?

 

You'll find out pretty soon that they are not that many.

 

As for your question at the end - both.

[Russell sprout]

On 22/04/2018 at 10:52, Lionator said:

There's talk of Wagner but nothing of somebody who's done an even better job at Brighton, maybe because he's English and that is uncool in managerial terms.

CH has done an excellent job at Brighton,

but I don’t think you can compare them to Huddersfield in terms of finances,fan base and more importantly expectation,

brighton are expected to be in the play offs at least where as Huddersfield expectation at championship level was simply survival 

[mozartfox]

47 minutes ago, MC Prussian said:

How many people are actually asking the team to win ten games in a row? 

And who is really expecting us to play "like Barcelona every game"?

 

You'll find out pretty soon that they are not that many.

 

As for your question at the end - both.

Not sure how many are asking what, but many seem to have unrealistic expectations of where we should be.  

[justfoxes]

What with Arsene Wenger leaving the Gooneys would anyone take Wenger over Puell ??

[Dickov22]

2 minutes ago, justfoxes said:

What with Arsene Wenger leaving the Gooneys would anyone take Wenger over Puell ??

Ha ha ha. And pigs can fly. 

[Kasey Keller]