Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, dayday said:

Have we actually signed anybody under Macia who’s decent?

Ndidi, Maguire, Iborra, Silva, Diabate and Iheanacho were all under Macia. I'd class them all as at least decent.

  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, woollett the bullet said:

In the light of whu apparently taking the Malaga guy as dof

 . . . Could Macia have still gone there but  in his present role as head of recruitment ?

I read they were taking the Malaga bloke as head of recruitment so maybe it's as well as Macia as DoF.

 

I expect a turbulent year at West Ham. Then again that's their usual.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Two aspects to this story:

With Macia not confirmed as West Ham's DoF, what does it say about our current Director of Football when the Head of Recruitment seeks better opportunities elsewhere after less than two years in charge?

And did the club know about Macia's intentions to switch cities beforehand? Now I wonder whether the club still wants to continue working with a man who on average jumps ship every year or so...

Edited by MC Prussian
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

If people are genuinely passing on what they are told from someone who would know what they were talking about, I have no problem with that and very much enjoy it. 

 

The ITK names being passed around as common knowledge hasn't changed in ages. Do your own due diligence.. After things have happened, decide which errors could have been due to changing circumstances, and which errors could only have come about by people making things up. 

 

Or don't bother and take everything you read at face value, but don't blanket insult everyone including those who are genuine.

  • Like 4
Posted

I'm not one for bashing the "ITK's" although I do question the motivations of those who claim to be, when they clearly aren't.

 

I just find it a bit odd, that's all. Each to their own I guess :dunno:

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, STUHILL said:

I'm not one for bashing the "ITK's" although I do question the motivations of those who claim to be, when they clearly aren't.

 

I just find it a bit odd, that's all. Each to their own I guess :dunno:

The poster who posted it as a track record of making claims to be wrong. 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, StanSP said:

he's giving away our tactics before he leaves. the snakey cvnt. 

Here he is, telling the whole world how to find the next Mahrez. Absolute snake :whistle:

DfQ9-tSW4AAYFMq.jpg:large

Edited by brucey
Posted
5 minutes ago, WigstonWanderer said:

If he’s definitely not going, can we close this thread now?

After only six pages ??

Have we finished slagging him off yet.

Posted
9 hours ago, gurru991 said:

After only six pages ??

Have we finished slagging him off yet.

Unlikely, transfer window is open 'till Aug 9th

Guest Papasmurf
Posted
15 hours ago, brucey said:

Here he is, telling the whole world how to find the next Mahrez. Absolute snake :whistle:

DfQ9-tSW4AAYFMq.jpg:large

 

He's just nicked that from football manager.

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 25/03/2018 at 03:22, Babylon said:

And he's signed who for us exactly to care? Maguire and N'didi had both been scouted long before this fella turned up, Diabate was a Puel pick... so.... bothered. 

We've had two rather strong transfer windows since his arrival, and he has helped us to build the deepest, most talented squad in the club's history. I'd rather keep him -- why mess with a good thing? 

Posted
On 13/06/2018 at 14:30, lcfc sheff said:

And this is my friends is why ITKs deserve to be scrutinised

Oh yes just like the Hazard, big name player signings lol 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...