Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Happy Fox

Eduardo Macia to West Ham?

By Happy Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

MC Prussian

MC Prussian

Posted
Posted (edited)

That makes for an interesting twist to our summer recruitment policy and a shuffle in that department.

We must have the remaining three to four summer signings lined up already.

 

Wonder who's taking over as Head of Recruitment now... Surely the club must have somebody lined up already. Or did the switch come as a surprise? :ph34r:

Seeing that Macia joined two months after Walsh was gone, how quickly will a replacement be available this time around?

Edited by MC Prussian
fairbanksh

fairbanksh

Posted
Posted

I really don't want Puel to have greater control and the planning seems inept again

I'm sure fans will be kept in the dark as usual but it seems letting Mafia go at a crucial recruitment time smacks of ineptitude

brucey

brucey

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, st albans fox said:

The last head of recruitment who left to become DOF .......... remind me how that went .........

Last time it happened, it fvcked up our entire window good and proper...  :nono:

Edited by brucey
Long Eaton Fox

Long Eaton Fox

Posted
Posted

I'm sure their are agreements in place in contracts so that anyone in his position cannot use the knowledge gained with us to help their new club to the detriment of the old in the signing of players. Besides whu may have a completely different set of criteria to ours and the players identified by Macia for us will not suit whu.

 

Also this has been on the cards for a while and we have still signed Pereira.

 

Worry not.

brucey

brucey

Posted
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, Long Eaton Fox said:

I'm sure their are agreements in place in contracts so that anyone in his position cannot use the knowledge gained with us to help their new club to the detriment of the old in the signing of players. Besides whu may have a completely different set of criteria to ours and the players identified by Macia for us will not suit whu.

Can't see how such an agreement would be enforceable. We can't just say to West Ham you're not allowed to go after any player which we recently had an interest in.

Walsh scouted Gueye as a Kante replacement while he was with us..... first thing he did at Everton was to immediately sign him.

 

......Macia must have been working on a Mahrez replacement for the past year :( 

What are the chances WH will suddenly sign a promising RW in the next few weeks, while we are still playing hardball with the Mahrez price?

 

Not sure Walsh will be open to coming back either... depends if either side have burnt their bridges..

Either way we need a replacement in ASAP, lets not go through an entire transfer window without a head of recruitment again, or we are screwed.

Edited by brucey
Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted

These geezers jump ship from us to become director of football elsewhere as they know they'll never get the gig with us whilst Jon Rudkin's nose is planted firmly up the Thai's ring pieces.

  • Like 3
m4DD0gg

m4DD0gg

Posted
Posted

I'm sure Rudkin will do the sterling job he always does. Leicester through and through that man. Complete club hero and a modern day football genius is old rudders. I perish the thought of him ever leaving. 

1972 Fox

1972 Fox

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, m4DD0gg said:

I'm sure Rudkin will do the sterling job he always does. Leicester through and through that man. Complete club hero and a modern day football genius is old rudders. I perish the thought of him ever leaving. 

Probably not much chance of Rudders being head hunted and leaving for another club.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...