FoxinNotts Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 17 minutes ago, StanSP said: if we get a player in before he goes, it gives us less negotiating power when it comes to the fee. I guess, but there’s ways and means, surely. Non disclosed fees? Do the deal, and anounce it the day before Mahrez leaves? (Don’t let Mahrez go until his replacement is found?)
the fox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 8 minutes ago, Countryfox said: Oooo ... can’t wait ! You playing striker now, Country?
SheppyFox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 (edited) I don’t resent this, especially if it’s 60m and Roberts I feel the same about this as I do Vardy potentially going to Atletico (don’t think that is as likely though). These two guys have propelled our club from being comparable to Burton, Derby for example to where we are now. They haven’t only done that but they’ll have presented us with massive sellon profits. That covers the financial side of it. As for what theyll do against against us? Well Manchester City for me will walk the league next year regardless, probably doing the double over us in the process regardless of his transfer. Atletico we won’t play. IMO they’ve paid their dues, it’s on us now to press forward if necessary without either and get the purchasing of their replacements right. If we do our jobs properly here on in it won’t matter because we’ll have the quality to not only move on but move upward. (Edit: it’s also better he goes to Man City than for example arsenal, a team he’d probably improve enough to take our 6th spot for next season. Him going to Man City hurts us less than him going to a team we aren’t far behind.) Edited 21 May 2018 by SheppyFox 3
the fox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 10 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said: I know he can be an excellent player, but don't believe he's as great as he believes that he is. Yes, players like Messi etc can have off-days, but personally think that Mahrez is too inconsistent to be considered a 'great' player. A fee of £50m-£65m would be classed as acceptable to a neutral. 1 Did you hear of a player name Mane? he was pretty much the poster boy of inconsistency at Southampton. Or, you can just look at Raheem Plus, in that Man city team, the amount of free assists and goals an attacking player can get is ridiculous. It's pretty much a layup. 65 Million is daylight robbery. It's only a bit fair because everyone knows that he will throw his dummy out if he doesn't get his move.
Ian Nacho Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Mahrez can't complain with the club not letting him go, it's his agent this time
chuck'em Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 38 minutes ago, StanSP said: if we get a player in before he goes, it gives us less negotiating power when it comes to the fee. On the flip side, we end up with less negotiating power when trying to buy a replacement after he's gone if everyone knows we got a big fee. There's a downside either way. 1
FoxinNotts Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 2 minutes ago, chuck'em said: On the flip side, we end up with less negotiating power when trying to buy a replacement after he's gone if everyone knows we got a big fee. There's a downside either way. Yeah that’s what I was thinking ?
FoxinNotts Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Just now, lgfualol said: No idea why Chelsea or Man U arent getting involved. I reckon Chelsea won’t be doing much until Conte situation resolved. And Jose don’t fancy him tbh
foxfanazer Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 (edited) Be good to get this done so early in the window. Are we actually doing business in the correct manner this summer? Edited 21 May 2018 by foxfanazer
Ric Flair Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Is it me or are The Mercury reporting way more speculative transfer stories these days? They'd only ever allude to deals being close when they'd been reported as pretty much done everywhere else. It seems they're trying much harder to gain publicity. 4
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 27 minutes ago, SheppyFox said: I don’t resent this, especially if it’s 60m and Roberts I feel the same about this as I do Vardy potentially going to Atletico (don’t think that is as likely though). These two guys have propelled our club from being comparable to Burton, Derby for example to where we are now. They haven’t only done that but they’ll have presented us with massive sellon profits. That covers the financial side of it. As for what theyll do against against us? Well Manchester City for me will walk the league next year regardless, probably doing the double over us in the process regardless of his transfer. Atletico we won’t play. IMO they’ve paid their dues, it’s on us now to press forward if necessary without either and get the purchasing of their replacements right. If we do our jobs properly here on in it won’t matter because we’ll have the quality to not only move on but move upward. (Edit: it’s also better he goes to Man City than for example arsenal, a team he’d probably improve enough to take our 6th spot for next season. Him going to Man City hurts us less than him going to a team we aren’t far behind.) I agree @SheppyFox 1
adamlcfcbevo85 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 If we sell mahrez for anything less than 65 million we are a absolute joke of a club. 50 million can only just buy you a top end championship player now. Jesus, villa rate grelish at 60 million and wtf
st albans fox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 11 minutes ago, adamlcfcbevo85 said: If we sell mahrez for anything less than 65 million we are a absolute joke of a club. 50 million can only just buy you a top end championship player now. Jesus, villa rate grelish at 60 million and wtf Do you know the record championship transfer fee ? grealish hasn’t moved anywhere so he doesn’t have a price - and you need to take into account the British players currently have an additional ‘brexit premium’ - no one know what changes in uk employment law will follow in 2020.
SecretPro Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 1 hour ago, the fox said: It's gonna be obnoxious when he gets called "world class" after few games at Man City like they helped develop him or make him a better player. We will be hearing how Pep transformed him into a great player in no time. I'll mess pep up if/when this happens.
Heymister2015 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 elynoussi however you spell it from basle and ben arfa and we'll be a stronger team
lgfualol Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 57 minutes ago, Ric Flair said: Is it me or are The Mercury reporting way more speculative transfer stories these days? They'd only ever allude to deals being close when they'd been reported as pretty much done everywhere else. It seems they're trying much harder to gain publicity. With the amount of traffic transfer stories get, and the millions of ads on the Merc website, it's really no surprise lol.
lee7 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 56 minutes ago, Stoney7 said: Get foden in No chance Man City are letting him go. Would love him on loan for a season though!
Jattdogg Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 £85 million ....pay up you cheap cvnts! You are full of money and bought the league anyways. Im not overly impressed with that league win as its an expectation when you are spending that much and have awesome players in every position. Bit jealous, maybe but you want one of our best players then meet the price! Lol Oh and feeeeckkkk offf 1
goose2010 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 2 minutes ago, chapero82 said: Surely 50 million is some kind of joke? They rate Roberts at 20m
chapero82 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 1 minute ago, goose2010 said: They rate Roberts at 20m We should just take the 70 and leave him out if it 1
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 27 minutes ago, Stevosevic said: Let’s hope Manchester City remember their wallet this time . . . .
Recommended Posts