Guest Posted 16 May 2018 Posted 16 May 2018 20 minutes ago, Long Eaton Fox said: Anyone take Stones and Roberts for Mahrez? In a second. Stones and Maguire would be incredible.
WestLothianFox Posted 16 May 2018 Posted 16 May 2018 5 hours ago, Long Eaton Fox said: Anyone take Stones and Roberts for Mahrez? Yes, as long as we get money as well.
coolhandfox Posted 16 May 2018 Posted 16 May 2018 5 hours ago, Long Eaton Fox said: Anyone take Stones and Roberts for Mahrez? There is no way Stones is going to come here!
Leicester_Loyal Posted 16 May 2018 Posted 16 May 2018 5 hours ago, Long Eaton Fox said: Anyone take Stones and Roberts for Mahrez? Stones isn't coming here, come on man.
Lovejoy Posted 16 May 2018 Posted 16 May 2018 9 hours ago, Ric Flair said: I think it'll be around £60 million and Roberts which I'd probably take. Hopefully can be done early doors, we could do with that £60m for a new GK, CB and RB.
egg_fried_rice Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/21/pep-guardiola-revives-interest-in-signing-riyahd-mahrez-manchester-city-leicester
CarbonVirtine Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 You mean, he's still here? Gosh. I thought he'd done the van rental and everything. 2
Fox in the North Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 37 minutes ago, egg_fried_rice said: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/may/21/pep-guardiola-revives-interest-in-signing-riyahd-mahrez-manchester-city-leicester I still can’t figure out why they need Mahrez given the plethora of attacking options they have. Not that I’m complying!
dynamark Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Like Man City badly need a new wide player.Suppose it keeps the price up though .Surely he wants to go to a European league where he can stroll around for 90 minutes.
Foxxed Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 I'm torn. I don't want to player here who's constantly looking to leave. But I do want a player here with 13 goals and 10 assists. But Puel does seem to have managerial pull so maybe we can replace him with someone half as good.
AKCJ Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 7 minutes ago, dynamark said: Like Man City badly need a new wide player.Suppose it keeps the price up though .Surely he wants to go to a European league where he can stroll around for 90 minutes. Their system means they have 4 players behind a main striker with Fernandinho holding. There's more than enough room for Mahrez in a team like that that hopes to play about 60 games a season.
Fightforever Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Give us roberts, foden and 55 million and it's a done deal.
Popular Post Gerard Posted 21 May 2018 Popular Post Posted 21 May 2018 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Fox in the North said: I still can’t figure out why they need Mahrez given the plethora of attacking options they have. Not that I’m complying! You mean why would Man City want a player that?: 1) Is a former PFA POTY 2) A former 7th placed Balon d'Or 3) Only player in the PL who has at least 10 goals and 10 assists in two of the last three years. Mahrez has 34 goals and 24 assists in the last three seasons. Hazard who is usually rated at about £150m has 32 goals and 10 assists In fact you can fire any attacking midfielder at me and Mahrez will have outperformed them over the last three seasons from predominately right midfield in a 4-4-2 in a low possession side. If he goes Man City we'll soon see if £60m is a bargain and whether they need him or not. I wouldn't be surprised to see him being hailed as world class and the best player in their team before the season's out. Edited 21 May 2018 by Gerard 16
les-tah Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 16 minutes ago, Gerard said: You mean why would Man City want a player that?: 1) Is a former PFA POTY 2) A former 7th placed Balon d'Or 3) Only player in the PL who has at least 10 goals and 10 assists in two of the last three years. Mahrez has 34 goals and 24 assists in the last three seasons. Hazard who is usually rated at about £150m has 32 goals and 10 assists In fact you can fire any attacking midfielder at me and Mahrez will have outperformed them over the last three seasons from predominately right midfield in a 4-4-2 in a low possession side. If he goes Man City we'll soon see if £60m is a bargain and whether they need him or not. I wouldn't be surprised to see him being hailed as world class and the best player in their team before the season's out. basically.. ultimately we are going to be screwed over i think. 1
coolhandfox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 (edited) I don't think LCFC fans will realise how good he is until he's gone. 23 minutes ago, Gerard said: Mahrez has 34 goals and 24 assists in the last three seasons. The people saying they would be happy with Diabates, Roberts and Gray to replace him when his gone, read the above...... I would be surprised if those three get that between them over the same period. Edited 21 May 2018 by coolhandfox 1
chapero82 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Sterling went there for nearly 50 million 3 years ago! We should be looking for at least 70 million
Ted Maul Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 I'm sure the owners won't be bullied- we'll get a decent fee, but it just seems like his time to move on. Use the money to bring in an attacking reinforcement or two- Thorgan Hazard would be ideal.
Fox in the North Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 51 minutes ago, Gerard said: You mean why would Man City want a player that?: 1) Is a former PFA POTY 2) A former 7th placed Balon d'Or 3) Only player in the PL who has at least 10 goals and 10 assists in two of the last three years. Mahrez has 34 goals and 24 assists in the last three seasons. Hazard who is usually rated at about £150m has 32 goals and 10 assists In fact you can fire any attacking midfielder at me and Mahrez will have outperformed them over the last three seasons from predominately right midfield in a 4-4-2 in a low possession side. If he goes Man City we'll soon see if £60m is a bargain and whether they need him or not. I wouldn't be surprised to see him being hailed as world class and the best player in their team before the season's out. It’s not that he’s not one of the greatest players we’ve ever had. I totally agree with everything you say. I just think the young players they already have can be developed into very similar freaks of nature without Man City having to spend £60m. If if he plays anything like he did before Christmas and in our title year, I dread to think the scores Man City will put up.
Ian Nacho Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 45 minutes ago, chapero82 said: Sterling went there for nearly 50 million 3 years ago! We should be looking for at least 70 million In all fairness Sterling was about 12 when they bought him.
RoyFox Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Makes perfect sense, Sane, Sterling and Mahrez play 35/40 games each on rotation, less injuries and fresher, especially for CL later rounds where arguably they weren’t at their best against Liverpool in the first leg and showed signs of fatigue. Plus Mahrez is also much more capable of breaking down teams in tight space than Bernardo Silva.
HankMarvin Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Should’ve kept his transfer request in greedy little git unless it was a sweetener to get him back onside in Feb
Superpants82 Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 (edited) Agent fees again https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/riyad-mahrez-manchester-city-deal-1592652.amp?__twitter_impression=true Edited 21 May 2018 by StevieB
Ashley Posted 21 May 2018 Posted 21 May 2018 Man City also want Hazard? I doubt they'll get both Riyad and Hazard.
Recommended Posts