Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, ozleicester said:

We have failed with 4 managers since winning the league.... where does that suggest the problem lies?

I dont think we failed with Shakespeare and given time Raneri could turned things but Puel is the worst of the lot because he has achieved nothing with his style of play. His good form was basically when we played in our old style. 

Posted

I’m interested to see what Puel would do with the squad in the summer but he probably won’t get the chance. However you need to pick up points before that. Owners need to come out after this and say Puel will be given the summer, if that is there intention. 

Posted
Just now, Beechey said:

What on Earth are you talking about? I constantly criticise his starting lineups when Morgan and Simpson are involved. I think having Choudhury in this lineup was a stupid error as well. Stop trying to win an argument that doesn't exist.

An argument that doesn't exist?  You consistently argue against anyone who wants him gone in every thread. Unless I'm getting you mixes up with another poster? Although I'm not. Because I've had the same discussion with you before. (Not argument, argument involves anger. I'm not angry at you. I just disagree.) 

Posted
1 minute ago, ARTY_FOX said:

@UPinCarolinaI mean atleast tell me why I'm wrong? 

Which comment are you referring to, specifically? I don’t wholeheartedly disagree with you; but I think blaming Puel is so one-dimensional. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, southfox66 said:

I dont think we failed with Shakespeare and given time Raneri could turned things but Puel is the worst of the lot because he has achieved nothing with his style of play. His good form was basically when we played in our old style. 

Disagree with the Raneri part.. we were more rubbisher with him. (YES i know thats not a word.)

 

Shakey had some tough games, but no forward thinking, probably shouldnt have been giving the job in the 1st place. Although you could argue he perhaps deserved a chance. 

Posted
1 minute ago, TonyN11 said:

No! Nacho should have stayed on - Gray was the one to go

Didn’t see that Nacho had come off when I posted that. I corrected myself afterwards.

Posted
Just now, UPinCarolina said:

Which comment are you referring to, specifically? I don’t wholeheartedly disagree with you; but I think blaming Puel is so one-dimensional. 

Just the one you quoted. Whilst I agree the players share some of the blame the matching trend setting in with puel from Southampton and now here surely indicates it's more down to him than not. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...