Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Eden De Bruyne

Timothy Castagne

By Eden De Bruyne, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

dayday

dayday

Posted
Posted

Kristof Terreur says he equally good on both flanks, more of a wing back than a full back, also said the premier league will suit more better than the Italian league, thinks Leicester will go with 3 cbs 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Popular Post
StriderHiryu

StriderHiryu

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 hour ago, honeybradger said:

One where the fans seemed to get it wrong was schalke fans with fuchs, brilliant player but they didnt seem to rate him that highly.

Really!? That's quite interesting! Fuchs I think was a class act for us from his first appearance!

 

How can anyone not rate someone who did this?

 

AmbitiousJointHammerheadshark-size_restr

 

 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 22
StriderHiryu

StriderHiryu

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, dayday said:

Kristof Terreur says he equally good on both flanks, more of a wing back than a full back, also said the premier league will suit more better than the Italian league, thinks Leicester will go with 3 cbs 

Logically this makes so much more sense to do. Even if somehow we signed a world class winger, Barnes, Gray and Albrighton aren’t. Barnes might improve but he’s no Jadon Sancho. Ricardo is one of the best full backs in Europe, JJ is promising. Fuchs and Albrighton have done well at LWB. Two up top means Vardy supported by either Nacho or Barnes. 3 in the middle suits Perez who looked much better behind the striker than on the wings. 3 of Ndidi / Tielemans / Maddison / Praet can all play. 
 

I prefer the 4141 stylistically but it would be much easier to recruit for 3412 and probably would play more to our strengths to go that way. 

Bryn

Bryn

Posted
Posted

I reckon Ricardo could play LWB to the same standard if it comes to it. He tends to drive inside anyway, that way he’d be cutting onto his stronger foot.

dayday

dayday

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said:

Logically this makes so much more sense to do. Even if somehow we signed a world class winger, Barnes, Gray and Albrighton aren’t. Barnes might improve but he’s no Jadon Sancho. Ricardo is one of the best full backs in Europe, JJ is promising. Fuchs and Albrighton have done well at LWB. Two up top means Vardy supported by either Nacho or Barnes. 3 in the middle suits Perez who looked much better behind the striker than on the wings. 3 of Ndidi / Tielemans / Maddison / Praet can all play. 
 

I prefer the 4141 stylistically but it would be much easier to recruit for 3412 and probably would play more to our strengths to go that way. 

What did make me laugh is that stringer mentioned why Castagne was equally good on both sides when he is naturally right footed, Kristof replied Paulo Maldini was one of the worlds best left backs and he was right footed.

  • Haha 1
1972 Fox

1972 Fox

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, dayday said:

What did make me laugh is that stringer mentioned why Castagne was equally good on both sides when he is naturally right footed, Kristof replied Paulo Maldini was one of the worlds best left backs and he was right footed.

Dennis Irwin also the same.

  • Like 1
TommyK

TommyK

Posted
Posted

Although I think this guy gives us the option to go 5-3-2 I don't think BR wants to play like that. 

 

Richardo is basically a wingback playing at right back. It's the way we play. Chilwell was the same. 

UHDrive

UHDrive

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, tsintskaro said:

Praet has not offered anything yet,so far he is not any better than Silva.

not sure about this transfer either.hope he will be fine 

How did you work that one out?

Strokes

Strokes

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, honeybradger said:

One where the fans seemed to get it wrong was schalke fans with fuchs, brilliant player but they didnt seem to rate him that highly.

Any quotes on that?

snoopy87

snoopy87

Posted
Posted

Imagine if we are in for Gosens at the same time and BR's masterplan is to push Ricky P further up. Think I've just got myself excited for no reason 

StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
Just now, NaijaFox said:

So have we signed him yet? Sounds like a fixer-upper. Not ideal, but hopeful.

Not yet but it will most likely happen.

 

But what exactly is a 'fixer-upper' in your eyes?

 

For me his versatility works well for us in the situation we find ourselves in - no regular LB apart from Thomas, only Justin as a proper right-back until Pereira comes back.

 

I think, if we also buy a LB too to rotate with Thomas, he may plan to use Ricardo further up and utilise how we know he can attack and have a forward-thinking football brain, so to speak. Then we have new LB/Thomas on one side, Castagne/Justin on the other with the option of Ricardo playing at RB if needed, and also further options of Castagne/Justin to play LB if really required.

NaijaFox

NaijaFox

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Not yet but it will most likely happen.

 

But what exactly is a 'fixer-upper' in your eyes?

 

For me his versatility works well for us in the situation we find ourselves in - no regular LB apart from Thomas, only Justin as a proper right-back until Pereira comes back.

 

I think, if we also buy a LB too to rotate with Thomas, he may plan to use Ricardo further up and utilise how we know he can attack and have a forward-thinking football brain, so to speak. Then we have new LB/Thomas on one side, Castagne/Justin on the other with the option of Ricardo playing at RB if needed, and also further options of Castagne/Justin to play LB if really required.

Just got through watching the obligatory Youtube clip, and the best that can be said is that he would add depth. 

Guest Chocolate Teapot

Guest Chocolate Teapot

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, UniFox21 said:

Interesting to see Dorsett still linking Tagliafico and Gosens. Wonder if they're still an idea and we're looking at both them and Castagne

Not sure how much money we've got. But my thoughts are wed still look for a left back if they see a value option available - I think this is more about someone who can play in a 352.

Someone on here said our first transfer would be a right back but are still after a left back. I wonder if mcneil could play left wing back too.

UniFox21

UniFox21

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Abrasive fox said:

Not sure how much money we've got. But my thoughts are wed still look for a left back if they see a value option available - I think this is more about someone who can play in a 352.

Someone on here said our first transfer would be a right back but are still after a left back. I wonder if mcneil could play left wing back too.

I'd suggest you could be right. If in the window we see a reasonably priced LB, then you'd think we'd potentially jump at it. Wonder if a Gosens/Castagne double swoop could be an option. But think we need to strengthen CB/ST/RW after this.

OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, lcfcbluearmy said:

I assume the red is his actual age and not the yellow? 😂Screenshot_20200831-202252__01.thumb.jpg.194acc2e0d7bae0bdd48ac265897e7bd.jpg

Born in Pizza :claudio:

  • Haha 1
Dahnsouff

Dahnsouff

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, turtmcfly said:

 

Most of them want to keep chestnuts.

Sorry but who hell would like to lose theirs?  :dunno:

 

Its quite a promising set of comments 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...