MGLCFC Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Just now, Lesta2014 said: 30 mill plus Benkovic on loan for a season? Unfortunately, Burnley would want more than 5 games out of him on a season long loan. We can't guarantee that!
Lesta2014 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Just now, MGLCFC said: Unfortunately, Burnley would want more than 5 games out of him on a season long loan. We can't guarantee that! Don’t know what you mean
happy85 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Leicester are expected to return with a new bid John percy
Pliskin Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 I don’t think Burnley will accept any less than £50m.
peach0000 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 6 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said: 30 mill plus Benkovic on loan for a season? On the burnley forum they seem to want Morgan for some reason 3
FoxinNotts Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 5 minutes ago, happy85 said: Leicester are expected to return with a new bid John percy Cash + player? 🧐
jayfox26 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 3 minutes ago, peach0000 said: On the burnley forum they seem to want Morgan for some reason No deal. Captain Wes will be part of the furniture here until the day he dies 2
RonnieTodger Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 I like Tarkowski but he’s not a £40m player 1
jayfox26 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 2 minutes ago, RonnieTodger said: I like Tarkowski but he’s not a £40m player If he was 3 or 4 years younger maybe but not now. No sell on value and prob only get 3-4 seasons of him at his best 1
Dahnsouff Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 1 minute ago, RonnieTodger said: I like Tarkowski but he’s not a £40m player He just available in a 50m market unfortunately
nettle Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Let's get this guy in pay the money, he's ready to go straight in the team no messing about we need a CB now.
RonnieTodger Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 3 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: He just available in a 50m market unfortunately I’d rather we went for Tah, personally
Ricey Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 We should have signed a CB in either of the last two windows. Clubs know we are desperate and they want to fill the financial void that Covid has left.
SheppyFox Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Wasn’t Tah available on loan? I can’t decide if I’ve imagined that loan with option on Tah would be good 😌
Guest Mickyblueeyes Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 We are just ****ing with West Ham. Pricks trying to follow what we do. Let’s just confuse the bastards.
urban.spaceman Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 4 minutes ago, Ricey said: We should have signed a CB in either of the last two windows. Clubs know we are desperate and they want to fill the financial void that Covid has left. Is he a joke to you? (yes, yes he is.) 2
FoxinNotts Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Out of Tah, Fofana and Tarkowski, I’d go for Tah. (Puts tin hat on, and awaits incoming abuse)! 1
urban.spaceman Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 Just now, Mickyblueeyes said: We are just ****ing with West Ham. Pricks trying to follow what we do. Let’s just confuse the bastards. Remember when Vichai refused to loan them Slimani because Brady had done spouted bollocks in her column about him buying wine just before sacking Ranieri? I hope it's our policy to ruin the ****ers out of spite from now on.
FoxinNotts Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 1 minute ago, urban.spaceman said: Remember when Vichai refused to loan them Slimani because Brady had done spouted bollocks in her column about him buying wine just before sacking Ranieri? I hope it's our policy to ruin the ****ers out of spite from now on. Maybe they took offence to WHU trying to muscle in on Fofana, and we thought ‘two can play that game’?
peach0000 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 1 minute ago, FoxinNotts said: Maybe they took offence to WHU trying to muscle in on Fofana, and we thought ‘two can play that game’? I'd laugh if we signed both just out of spite. Imagine the West Ham meltdown 1
The_77 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: Maybe they took offence to WHU trying to muscle in on Fofana, and we thought ‘two can play that game’? Our brass have never been big fans of Brady and the Dildo Brothers. Edited 25 September 2020 by The_77
foxpleasure Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 4 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Remember when Vichai refused to loan them Slimani because Brady had done spouted bollocks in her column about him buying wine just before sacking Ranieri? I hope it's our policy to ruin the ****ers out of spite from now on. Top: Dont care how much it costs, sign both!
Raw Dykes Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 13 minutes ago, Ricey said: We should have signed a CB in either of the last two windows. Clubs know we are desperate and they want to fill the financial void that Covid has left. It's not like we didn't try. IIRC, we were getting quoted £50m for Tarkowski and £70m for Ake last summer. They knew we were desperate back then, as well.
sphericalfox Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 2 minutes ago, Raw Dykes said: It's not like we didn't try. IIRC, we were getting quoted £50m for Tarkowski and £70m for Ake last summer. They knew we were desperate back then, as well. We weren't desperate. We were getting stupid quotes cos figured we were loaded from the Maguire sale.
Lambert09 Posted 25 September 2020 Posted 25 September 2020 (edited) Burnley want 40m and this might happen. To put it into perspective that’s 27 Diabates.... footballs a funny old game Edited 25 September 2020 by Lambert09
Recommended Posts