Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
StriderHiryu

Youri Tielemans

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, enmac said:

It became both. Only because they were born 30 miles apart and they're both Belgian. 😁

I like Belgian chocolates. Can we discuss them in here as well, or would that just be going round in cycles?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ARM1968 said:

I like Belgian chocolates. Can we discuss them in here as well, or would that just be going round in cycles?

Bruge is even nicer than you would think but Brussels is a madhouse. Chimay blue is incredible beer mind you.πŸ™ƒπŸ™ƒ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest StevieLynex
8 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

If we're going full irrelevant here, may I offer this ancient nonsense for your mid-week amusement...Β 

Β 

Β 

Mr Bean wasn't around at the same time as Not the Nine O'Clock News

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, ARM1968 said:

I like Belgian chocolates. Can we discuss them in here as well, or would that just be going round in cycles?

I lived, was Left broken hearted, picked up the broken spilinters, got shot at, got held-up, travel-documents with Contract for Work in S.America stolen

spent a night at a Local Station nick ,with door open hadΒ No papers,Gendarm-Escort to paid ferry...

Met a German-girl, Who became my wife, the rest as they say is History...& All thatΒ  in Belguim...and I still love the Country & people...

Β 

He who does not wish for little things does not deserve big things.’ 

Β 

A Belgien proverb that could fit...some on this forum....or

Β 

Or if you think, you are Good at problem solving,Β  a good & strong decision maker...Then Think again..

β€˜When you walk into a chocolate store, suddenly the most difficult decision you will ever have to make in your life is deciding which chocolates to pick!Β 

Β 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, enmac said:

It became both. Only because they were born 30 miles apart and they're both Belgian. 😁

I like meandering threads, and am a bit fascinated by mental cyclists, so no worries 🀣

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ClaphamFox said:

The team is defined by a common identity - you have to be English to play. It's not a team of stars plucked at great expense from around the world - it's a team of players of the same nationality.

I get why some people aren't into it - we've been fed some utter dross over the years. But it's very weird indeedΒ when people go out of their way to boast about the fact that they dislike their own national team and - in some cases - actively support other countries.

And what would you state are the qualifying criteria for being English? Language, genetics, birthplace, parentage...etc.

Who do you cheer for when the Olympics are being staged or when the Commonwealth Games are on.

Β 

I wouldn't boast about not supporting England, but, where once I would follow every game, the whole England 'thing' now leaves me cold. Perhaps it's because football is the overwhelmingly favourite sport of the 'English' (whoever they are) and yet our teams have gradually become lifeless and mechanical over the time the Premier has become the foremost league in the world. I'm not sure whether there's an inverse correlation in there, but, if I saw Brazil were playing Argentina at the same time as England were playing Spain, I'd probably choose to watch the former. If England were playing Belgium I would watch it to expecting a better performance from Belgium and probably feel more emotionally drawn towards Youri and Timothy than Harry and Chilly - who a lot on here simply cannot abide. How can you root for a team when half of the players incite some kind of negativity from one?

It's a mutable tribalism.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gerblod said:

And what would you state are the qualifying criteria for being English? Language, genetics, birthplace, parentage...etc.

Who do you cheer for when the Olympics are being staged or when the Commonwealth Games are on.

Β 

I wouldn't boast about not supporting England, but, where once I would follow every game, the whole England 'thing' now leaves me cold. Perhaps it's because football is the overwhelmingly favourite sport of the 'English' (whoever they are) and yet our teams have gradually become lifeless and mechanical over the time the Premier has become the foremost league in the world. I'm not sure whether there's an inverse correlation in there, but, if I saw Brazil were playing Argentina at the same time as England were playing Spain, I'd probably choose to watch the former. If England were playing Belgium I would watch it to expecting a better performance from Belgium and probably feel more emotionally drawn towards Youri and Timothy than Harry and Chilly - who a lot on here simply cannot abide. How can you root for a team when half of the players incite some kind of negativity from one?

It's a mutable tribalism.

Good old-fashioned cognitive dissonance. It's easy with practiceΒ ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bert Fill
54 minutes ago, Blarmy said:

I like meandering threads, and am a bit fascinated by mental cyclists, so no worries 🀣

Coincidentally, I like mental threads, and am fascinated by meandering cyclists!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blarmy said:

I like meandering threads, and am a bit fascinated by mental cyclists, so no worries 🀣

More meandering. Eddy could also play football. Would probably made a great box to box midfielder. Could probably have run all day. Also, he would have been highly competitive. Born to win.Β 

Β 

https://cartophilic-info-exch.blogspot.com/2019/05/panini-sprint-74-01-eddy-merckx.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClaphamFox said:

Good old-fashioned cognitive dissonance. It's easy with practiceΒ ;)

Teensy-weensy bit of hypocrisy there? I think you've shown your slip a tad. You don't understand how others can feel that way and yet you come up with a glib, yet incisive, explanation for how it works personally (?) for you. Fine, I won't pursue it.

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, enmac said:

More meandering. Eddy could also play football. Would probably made a great box to box midfielder. Could probably have run all day. Also, he would have been highly competitive. Born to win.

I've watched a lot of pro cycling - there's the skinny and the small and the muscular and the tall, but only one I've ever seen resembling Eddy - and that was the 'Tashkent Terror' - Djamolidine Abdoujaparov. But Eddy was taller by three inches. They both looked big around the shoulders - like boxers. I reckon you're right about him making a midfielder (or maybe a proper bully of a striker). Rock hard with incredible stamina.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, gerblod said:

Teensy-weensy bit of hypocrisy there? I think you've shown your slip a tad. You don't understand how others can feel that way and yet you come up with a glib, yet incisive, explanation for how it works personally (?) for you. Fine, I won't pursue it.

Β 

Jesus Christ it was just a joke mateΒ lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, An Sionnach said:

We are going to have to generate an awful lot of money in the next year , to improve contracts and sign new playersΒ  and expand the stadium. Personally I have no idea where it will come from.

EL campaign, fans back in the ground, new shirt sponsor, got rid of the deadwood (Fuchs, Morgan, Slimani, Gray, James), sell a couple of players and a youngster (Praet/Hamza/Mendy, Benkovic, Ghezzel, George Hirst, Josh Knight). There's no doubt in my mind we'll sell a big player next summer as well, might end up being Maddison, Cags or Ricardo, depends on their contract situations, we'll get good money for all of them, that in itself could pay for the stadium expansion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gerblod said:

I strongly dislike your reference to Fuchs and Morgan as "dead wood".Β 

Do you need reminding that they were both, until very recently, still capable of functioning as first team players? They are both club legends and, as such, deserve the respect for being so.

Matty James deserves respect too. Had he not been injured so often, his career at Leicester would have been pivotal to our success. Better a footballer than Choudhury and Mendy.

Β 

As for transferring Maddison, Pereira or Soyuncu - those players are essential to the forthcoming EL campaign. City could possibly get away with selling Ricardo's services, but the same ambition the Club has in creating a better stadium is also found in the desire to create a better team.

Β 

The expansion of the stadium is an important mid-term project. However the next season has to be one where a better deeper squad is consolidated.

Β 

Β 

Β 

I can’t believe Morgan and Fuchs were referred to as dead wood πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ christ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...