Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
StanSP

Wolves (H) - Match Thread - 08/11/2020

Recommended Posts

The hand stops the cross going in which I think is the crucial thing. If the hand isn’t there it’s a cross that could lead to a goal. It his body was behind his hand then it would be a different story but it wasn’t. He gained an unfair advantage with his hand so it’s correct for me. However I can also understand the other point of view.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hejammy said:

I'm sorry anyone who thinks we've been poor has either really really high expectations or is watching a different game? :dunno:

People just like to slate, we’ve done well against such a defensive side.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest seanfox778

They didn't even show the actual goal at half time, just the penalty decisions. 

Edited by seanfox778
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no doubt about it Sky Sports hates us. That was a penalty according to the laws “a player will be penalised for handball: if the hand/arm is clearly away from the boy and outside of the ‘body line’’ what part of those rules are unclear to Jamie Carragher and Micah Richards. Thank god for the voice of reason Roy Keane.😂

Edited by Philkeavo
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This gives a new meaning to ‘park the bus’.  Nuno has had the engine removed and removed the wheels.

 

They know we will tire second half (which must be the tactical plan) but BR has for sure his planned substitutions all worked out...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dan LCFC said:

Sorry Stan I won't criticise your beloved VAR ever again.

It's not VAR's issue though? 

 

Both penalties, technically, have been correct. The laws instruct them to give the first one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not a hand ball for me, whether it's the rule or not I don't know because I've lost track of it. I'm happy we've been given it because I obviously want us to win and because of how many have gone against us of late. 

 

But there should never be a rule in place where that is punished legitimally. It's unbelievably harsh. The thing is you can't even rely on VAR give you the right outcome anyway so it's completely pot luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making a very good side look very average, even if they’ve been so poor we seemingly started to lose the zip we need for the passes. Only problem is they can’t be as bad second half.

 

Will be interesting to see what subs he makes. I reckon he banked on him taking Praet off but he’s been the best player on the park.

Edited by when_you're_smiling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, foxinsocks said:

When is ndidi back... they mentioned him in the commentary... like he was months away. Weve seen Ricky on photos..  where is wilf?

He is doing some light fluffing on Pornhub.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tuna said:

NEXT 2nd half live

 

bollocks at least one more ad break after this one

And then they moan to say they only break even to justify charging £14;99 for PPV have they forgotten about the amount of adverts they throw at you at pre game during halftime and full time?

So glad today is not a PPV game !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...