Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Mark

Match Ratings: Leicester City 5-0 Sheff Utd - Vote Now

By Mark, in Leicester City Forum

Leicester City 5-0 Sheff Utd

You do not have permission to vote. Please login to vote.
  1. 7.4

    Total Average Rating

    223 votes

  2. Highest Rated Player

    Kelechi Iheanacho 9.5

  3. Lowest Rated Player

    Ricardo Pereira 6.4
  4. Manager Confidence 98% +2%

Recommended Posts

Mark

Mark

Posted
Posted

Season: 2020/21
Voting Starts: 14/03/21
Voting Ends: 19/03/21

  1. Kasper Schmeichel
  2. Wesley Fofana
  3. Jonny Evans
  4. Çağlar Söyüncü
  5. Ricardo Pereira
  6. Wilfred Ndidi
  7. Youri Tielemans
  8. Timothy Castagne
  9. Ayoze Pérez
  10. Kelechi Iheanacho
  11. Jamie Vardy
  12. Marc Albrighton (sub)
  13. Khanya Leshabela (sub)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blabyboy

blabyboy

Posted
Posted

Had JV and Evans - I thought he really bought us stability at the back and cleaned up. JV didn't score (officially) but made a couple including a sublime pass.

 

But... on reflection, how can you not give it to Nacho for a hat-trick.. I must've been so shocked!  :)

 

Well done Kels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
turlo

turlo

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Other than his finishing being off Vardy was very good today. Looked a lot sharper and making more runs behind and into the channels. Think he's struggled to get fully fit being thrown back into 2 games a week after his injury. Now he has time in between games to recover and train I expect Vardy to have a good finish to the season!

So please for Nacho and Perez after all the flak they've got in the past. Perez needs to play centrally and not out of position on the wing

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Alan Frost

Alan Frost

Posted
Posted

I'm always amazed when my match ratings line up roughly with the overall ratings especially as I always feel I would be helped by some sort of guide as to absolute values as opposed to relative values . For instance I gave Iheanacho 9 today as I thought he worked hard ( best ever i've seen from him) and took all his goals well. However the opposition was extremely poor and he missed a sitter. Early on when the match looked far more even , say the first 15=20 minutes, I thought we were regaining  possession due largely to SU mistakes. and during this early period it seemed to me Vardy was pressing more effectively than for several matches but was still lacking enough support in pressing from iheanacho and Perez..  During this early period Perez was getting knocked off the ball at times, not linking as well as he did later and while much better the first half hour felt very flat to me and I was very aware of my pessimistic feelings pre-match.

 

Our goal was never threatened but we were limited to a couple of long inaccurate shots and the Perez  header. We gradually were improving then scored an excellent goal and improved rapidly ,often being gifted possession, Ndidi was doing well and it seemed we hardly needed to press after the goal .Only seen the goals from touchline angle . Obviously that was fine for the first goal but the Perez and follow up goals all seemed amazingly well struck and directed. We now hardly seemed to need to press and were almost constantly in possession. 

 

So I gave Iheanacho a 9 gratefully ,especially as he was trying to get JV a goal which he should have had, but feel a bit generous as he could have had a couple more although it seems a bit harsh that he would have had to press like a supersonic steam roller and score five goals to have got a ten from me. I'm just so pleased for him and he was so grateful and seems one of the good guys and quite devout.

 

I also felt so mean only giving Kasper a 6 after some of his recent performances  but how could I give him more than 6? The bugger never seemed to be doing anything. But I gave him 6 as so far however little he has had to do I always assume he follows the match ,totally alert and he pressed the grass down nicely at the edge of most of the penalty box, yelling head away ,and then very quietly and unheard " .I' ll be with you in a minute when I've pressed this tricky bit down.". I also deducted 1/4 point from the whole midfield for two much passing back although having watched a couple of Man City matches since we last played (seemed like a month) I gather even the best do it quite often these days. I only gave the young lad substituted on a 6 but he looked impressive to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Bluefoxtim said:

Sky sports player ratings...

 

Schmeichel gets a 5, Ramsdale a 6 lol

 

Kel gets only an 8. 

Ramsdale made a few saves, Kasper barely touched the ball. I think that's fair. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aus Fox

Aus Fox

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Webbo said:

Ramsdale made a few saves, Kasper barely touched the ball. I think that's fair. 

It all depends on what you call average. I would say a 6 is a player with minimal impact upon a game, where they neither do anything special nor do they make any mistakes. 
In this game to be fair Kasper could have been given a n/a. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
funkyrobot

funkyrobot

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Webbo said:

Ramsdale made a few saves, Kasper barely touched the ball. I think that's fair. 

5 is usually a score people give to someone who has had a bad game. Goes back to the old Shoot/Match/90 minutes mag ratings. 6 was always a mark for an average performance and that’s what Schmeichel should’ve got (purely because he didn’t have much to do but what he did have to do was done with no issues.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bluebeau

bluebeau

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Aus Fox said:

It all depends on what you call average. I would say a 6 is a player with minimal impact upon a game, where they neither do anything special nor do they make any mistakes. 
In this game to be fair Kasper could have been given a n/a. 

Exactly!  How can you mark a keeper that has nothing to do during the whole game?

Kasper wasn't involved in the game because Sheffield didn't  cause him to make a single save!  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...