Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sampson

Ukraine

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Line-X said:

A bj courtesy of Monika Lewinsky? I think the more troubling issue was that like Trump, he was willing to lie in office, under oath and to the American people. 

That Lewinsky thing is a big no no when it comes to employer/employee relationships.
 

Guess you forgot about the fact that he hung out with Epstein (possibly on kiddie-island)

You also seem to forget that he also lied in office, under oath and to the American people - which led to his impeachment.

 

BTW, I’m not excusing/defending Trump.  I just think it’s funny when people point out his ridiculousness, without realizing others did the same or sometimes worse.

Edited by marbles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, marbles said:

Guess you forgot about the speculation about him hanging out with Epstein (possibly on kiddie-island)

You also seem to forget that he also lied in office, under oath and to the American people - which led to his impeachment.

 

BTW, I’m not excusing/defending Trump.  I just think it’s funny when people point out his ridiculousness, without realizing others did the same or sometimes worse.

No, I didn't forget at all and I do agree.

 

Remember though, Trump’s fanboys were happy to countenance  - actually, overlook his cosiness with Epstein, but the moment that Clinton was similarly associated with him they were outraged. Also, when Joe Biden had a claim made against him by a former staffer, the claim was immediately weaponised by the same people who completely glossed over far more numerous allegations against Trump. So actually, it really works both ways. 

 

I'm fairly sure that Clinton's presence on the island has never been proven and that this stems from anecdotal testimony, although significantly, Giuffre herself. 

 

I think we really need to leave it there otherwise this will be the third thread that comes under the threat of extinction. I do take your point though. One for the politics thread perhaps? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MPH said:


 

from what I can remember NATO has welcomed the notion of Ukraine joining. 
 

 

 

Why would they not?

My understanding is that Ukraine began negotiations to join NATO back in 2008 but after elections in 2010 the then president of Ukraine, Yanukovych, appeared to get cold feet and decided to abandon the plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, David Hankey said:

My understanding is that Ukraine began negotiations to join NATO back in 2008 but after elections in 2010 the then president of Ukraine, Yanukovych, appeared to get cold feet and decided to abandon the plan.

And when Yushchenko was contesting the elections with a presidential candidate favoured by Russia. oddly enough, he was poisoned with a dioxin. Who on earth could have been responsible for that? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, goody2028 said:

Such a brave brave man. Not for what’s going on over there but for wanting to speak to Boris :ph34r:

He's going to question him about so called 'work events'.

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, marbles said:

That Lewinsky thing is a big no no when it comes to employer/employee relationships.
 

Guess you forgot about the fact that he hung out with Epstein (possibly on kiddie-island)

You also seem to forget that he also lied in office, under oath and to the American people - which led to his impeachment.

 

BTW, I’m not excusing/defending Trump.  I just think it’s funny when people point out his ridiculousness, without realizing others did the same or sometimes worse.

Well, it’s not if you don’t get caught and you’re the employer

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Daggers said:

Williamson is a hamper, seven sandwiches, and a large bottle of pop short of a picnic.

I don't disagree that he's a complete stooge, but despite his unpleasant, belittling tone, what he suggests is a viable way out of the conflict for Ukraine and Russia that should be seriously considered, and I hope the UK government is encouraging Ukraine (in more reasonable terms) to use this as a starting point for negotiations. Ukraine would need to cede ownership of a region that was pretty much already under Russian control, and agree to remain 'neutral,' which is the bigger sticking point because its such a loaded term. But it would be a kind-of step down for Putin, who has been humiliated on the global stage, while also allowing him to claim some kind of victory in line with his whole 'its a special operation' guff. I think the Ukrainian people have shown great bravery and resolve in the face of genuinely evil violence and aggression, and my heart aches for their suffering, but I don't think total victory, for them or Russia, will make the world a safer place now. Some kind of compromise needs to be reached. 

 

Sadly, it wouldn't necessarily guarantee long term security or stability in the region, mainly because Putin is not trustworthy, but personally, I think the current rapid escalation of violence and rhetoric is terrifying, and realpolitik is needed to resolve things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Countries like the uk that have allowed Russian oligarchs to reside and to support putins dictatorship are the biggest hypocrites there are. Both new labour and the Tories have been influenced directly by Russia, Blair praised putin for his actions in Chechnya and the Tories have taken millions from Russian oligarchs. And let it be clear, many nations supported yeltsin even after he rigged the elections, which led directly to the rise of nationalism and putin. You can't have it both ways. If they had taken the threat of war seriously since over 20 years algo we wouldn't be where we are. Doesn't hemp either that these countries have Done the same as Russia in Iraq Libya and other countries killing civilians. 

 

I just feel for the Ukrainian civilians, these governments are  to be blamed for this situation as well. The agreements after the fall of the ussr should have been respected from both sides. 

But you can't condone war in one place and praise it in another. Solidarity with the civilians who suffer above all. 

Negotiations should be based upon the accords after the fall of the ussr, not upon anything else. Russia can't be allowed to take in more and more land.. But you can't set a precedent that war is okay and 100% justifiable when you do it but incorrect when others do it like the west have done. 

 

Solidarity is needed with the Ukrainian people above all, not with the military, but the people. The 99%.

Edited by NasPb
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westernpark said:

Been keeping tabs on the thread (the many). https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/08/russia-ukraine-war-possible-trajectories
This is worth a read.

There was talk in the Washington Post of Biden considering offering Putin a golden bridge at some point. I believe that will happen to avoid the above. 

A very sobering read, one of the best I've read so far. Thanks.

 

What was the detail of the 'golden bridge' you mentioned?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, blabyboy said:

A very sobering read, one of the best I've read so far. Thanks.

 

What was the detail of the 'golden bridge' you mentioned?

Essentially, it will allow him to save face to an extent that is acceptable for both parties. Positively Russia did announce some requirements, for an end to this monstrosity yesterday. That is something to work with. 
But we have to be calm and level headed and even though western leaders may want to denounce quite emotively the evils that he is responsible for, we can’t go all the way and not allow some way back for him. 
This is a long game and if played well, Putin will be gone without the rest of us gone too. 
 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, westernpark said:

Essentially, it will allow him to save face to an extent that is acceptable for both parties. Positively Russia did announce some requirements, for an end to this monstrosity yesterday. That is something to work with. 
But we have to be calm and level headed and even though western leaders may want to denounce quite emotively the evils that he is responsible for, we can’t go all the way and not allow some way back for him. 
This is a long game and if played well, Putin will be gone without the rest of us gone too. 
 

Always thought this is how it might go in the end. Calls for stoking the fire, the assassin of Putin or full scale war are a bit silly as it would inevitably means huge losses of live. Your post is essentially the realistic solution and lesser of many evils.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...