Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sly

England - Always a bridesmaid, or overhyped?

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Nalis said:

Fair enough but if you look at most big teams they dont usually play other big teams until the quarters at least and a number of those still fall to the mediocre nations.

Yep irony is that the same argument could be levelled at two of the semi finalists. Argentina have had a stroll on paper until the QFs
 

The other two come from a really competitive - one of those Croatia, have only beat Canada. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally don't think there's been much hype this tournament - And it's gradually been played down during the last few tournaments imo.

 

Whether that's because we've all (In general) become accustomed to it, whether it's just me personally and my lack of enthusiasm  :dunno: 

 

But normally it'd be wall to wall coverage, non-stop talk, countdowns to the QF, e.t.c, I didn't see any of that - maybe I just managed to avoid it.

 

I’ve barely heard “It’s Coming Home” or any other football song - probably heard it twice throughout the tournament - normally the songs are played on repeat.

 

The tournament has been good in regards upsets, underdogs, but on a whole regarding quality, the 'big' name players, the 'big' teams, its been awfully poor. France have been the best team, England probably not far behind.

 

Edited by Matt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nalis said:

Fair enough but if you look at most big teams they dont usually play other big teams until the quarters at least and a number of those still fall to the mediocre nations.

Never having won the EC and in the final only once is an abysmal return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nalis said:

I know countries like England base world cup success on winning the thing but if you look at world cup performance based on how far teams get, England's overall record isnt actually that bad.

Not to Have beaten one of the heavyweights in the knockouts on foreign soil is pretty appalling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this young crop of players are really talented and capable of winning games but a tournament is complicated. So many twists and turns along the way some in your favor and some not. 
the powers that be have to analyze why England always fail against top opposition in knock out games? They’ve proven they can beat them in isolated games or friendlies. You could say mental pressure.

If it’s small details and moments like kane said then let’s analyze those. For starters why did England start like they usually do slowly and cautiously inviting the frenchies to draw first blood? I was praying that SG will start differently and put the pressure on the french. This was a mistake imo.

the strategy to contain mbappe was sound but not at the detriment of letting griezman run the midfield or leave giroud unmarked in the box. I’m not saying england didn’t try but they had to do much better than that. did the coaches not do their homework? The ref was terrible should have had another penalty or free kick but did that affect England? Bellingham was good but not as good as he was in the Senegal game. Kane missing his penalty was criminal. He’s a stone cold killer in front of the box. Not much fazes him. He did everything right except dialing down the power level. He over thought it in the moment knowing who he was facing instead of trusting his usual senses. 
yes Lori’s could have guessed correctly but atleast it’s on target - fair play but to spoon it like that will haunt him forever as he never ever does that and will probably never do it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Vacamion said:

 

Until we pick and play in-form players rather than managers' favourites, we will never win anything.

 

 

So you'd rather go to a world cup with a bunch of players who have never played with each other because they had a good October? I understand your point to an extent, Maddison being the stand out example, but managers spend two years building a side for these tournaments. Pickford and Maguire are good examples of players who always do alright for England despite their club form being questionable at times. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over history we have underperformed I would say.

Lets compare to Europe=
Germany 4 WC’s 3 Euros

Spain 1 WC 2 Euro’s

Italy 4 WC’s 1 Euro

France 2 WC’s 2 Euro’s

Portugal 2 WC sf 1 Euro

Netherlands 3 WCF 1 Euro

England (as big a league as top 3)

1 World Cup, 1 Euro final

Way behind the top 3, we’re comparable with Portugal & that’s wrong!!

But Southgate has got tournament results & we generally have a v good current squad.

Its luck, mentality & mindset, sadly generally we are gallant losers, that’s the distasteful but truthful fact & stats as above.

Interestingly Friday Klinsmann said we should have won the Euro’s final, but we stopped playing & handed control of the game to Italy.

Mentality again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Dan LCFC said:

We perform to par and act like it's an achievement because we've performed below par in previous tournaments. Nobody in France would've been "proud" if they'd lost to England yesterday and had more shots despite how good England's side supposedly is.

 

Until we start acting like a top team we will be a bridesmaid.

Spot on.

We make excuses all the time and give praise to people and to things that aren’t at all praiseworthy. 
It’s become a part of the British mentality. We have kind of learnt a. To be losers and b. That’s completely acceptable. When we DO win something, OBE’s and Knighthoods are given out like confetti.

It’s bound up in the snowflake culture of the country that’s become incredibly prevalent over the past 20 years or so. Did I read that we have more people out of work and claiming welfare at present than ever before. Bound up in covid, yes, but it’s become socially acceptable to be this way too.

Just look at this forum tbf. There are as many posters claiming that England did well as there are stating that we should have done better.

We could and probably should have done better.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

Spot on.

We make excuses all the time and give praise to people and to things that aren’t at all praiseworthy. 
It’s become a part of the British mentality. We have kind of learnt a. To be losers and b. That’s completely acceptable. When we DO win something, OBE’s and Knighthoods are given out like confetti.

It’s bound up in the snowflake culture of the country that’s become incredibly prevalent over the past 20 years or so. Did I read that we have more people out of work and claiming welfare at present than ever before. Bound up in covid, yes, but it’s become socially acceptable to be this way too.

Just look at this forum tbf. There are as many posters claiming that England did well as there are stating that we should have done better.

We could and probably should have done better.

 

But people were proud of our sides in the 90s? Including yourself? And they achieved exactly the same? It isn't the sign of "snowflake culture" to be proud of an infinitely likeable side for leaving everything on the pitch in 2022. Come on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks, this isn’t rocket science.

 

England have been stunningly consistent in World Cup match results.  You beat the minnows, you mix it up with the decent sides (more often winning), and you lose to the sides that can actually win the World Cup.

 

A few days ago, Michael Cox toted up all England WC match results since 1998 in the Athletic.  I’ve tweaked his data * and anyone can understand what it shows:

 

185497969_englandwcresults.JPG.1019ae39d25e77a81f148a78df07a986.JPG

 

Talent-wise, there’s of room to argue how you have varied.  But results-wise, you’ve been a slightly-better-or-worse version of the same side for at least a quarter century. 

 

 

* added the loss to France, counted results on pens as W or L instead of D, and changed the FIFA ranking category to groups of 10

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, KingsX said:

Folks, this isn’t rocket science.

 

England have been stunningly consistent in World Cup match results.  You beat the minnows, you mix it up with the decent sides (more often winning), and you lose to the sides that can actually win the World Cup.

 

A few days ago, Michael Cox toted up all England WC match results since 1998 in the Athletic.  I’ve tweaked his data * and anyone can understand what it shows:

 

185497969_englandwcresults.JPG.1019ae39d25e77a81f148a78df07a986.JPG

 

Talent-wise, there’s of room to argue how you have varied.  But results-wise, you’ve been a slightly-better-or-worse version of the same side for at least a quarter century. 

 

 

* added the loss to France, counted results on pens as W or L instead of D, and changed the FIFA ranking category to groups of 10

Good info.

I don’t see that as ‘over achieving’ in any way, shape or form but it’ll be ok because Harry Kane is a popular media figure and Gareth’s right hand man.

’Doing well’ and achieving would be, in my eyes at least, getting some sort of 50:50 split going on. But the 2:8 ratio is actually pretty damning.

In contemporary Britain it’ll be accepted and argued out somehow. If we want genuine success though, heads should roll really with that evidence. Maybe that’s it though actually. Are people genuinely that bothered anymore?

Edited by Col city fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overhyped.

 

I would say that it is not just down to the players because we have had some good enough squads over the years. Managing plays a big part and we never seem to get them both right at the same time.

 

You need both to win the worldcup and a tiny bit of luck.

 

Keep plugging away i suppose. The dream continues but i am getting older by the year so hurry the fook up lads lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

Spot on.

We make excuses all the time and give praise to people and to things that aren’t at all praiseworthy. 
It’s become a part of the British mentality. We have kind of learnt a. To be losers and b. That’s completely acceptable. When we DO win something, OBE’s and Knighthoods are given out like confetti.

It’s bound up in the snowflake culture of the country that’s become incredibly prevalent over the past 20 years or so. Did I read that we have more people out of work and claiming welfare at present than ever before. Bound up in covid, yes, but it’s become socially acceptable to be this way too.

Just look at this forum tbf. There are as many posters claiming that England did well as there are stating that we should have done better.

We could and probably should have done better.

This post is spectacularly daft Colin lol really out done yourself here 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a very good squad of players who could, maybe should, have won it. 
 

Having said that they are massively overhyped, I know we live in an era of clicks, views and ratings so maybe that has something to do with it all being whipped up into a frenzy. 
 

Foden in particular seems to be worshipped by the media like he’s the next Messi, he’s not even remotely close to that level. Southgate’s short comings just seem to be swept aside, it’s almost like the television media in particular are afraid to comment.  Every tournament you get those referees who seem to see the game totally differently and have one of those days you just have to overcome it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Livid said:

That was a very good squad of players who could, maybe should, have won it. 
 

Having said that they are massively overhyped, I know we live in an era of clicks, views and ratings so maybe that has something to do with it all being whipped up into a frenzy. 
 

Foden in particular seems to be worshipped by the media like he’s the next Messi, he’s not even remotely close to that level. Southgate’s short comings just seem to be swept aside, it’s almost like the television media in particular are afraid to comment.  Every tournament you get those referees who seem to see the game totally differently and have one of those days you just have to overcome it. 

Exactly my point. The table above tells us the real story. We’ve won one game (one) against so called ‘top opposition’. Yet the media today is full of bad luck stories.

It’s as if Gareth’s shortcomings can’t be looked at. I know WE can, but pundits etc will skirt around it.

Why is this? I suggest two main reasons: one, he’s a nice bloke and we don’t want to ‘offend him’ (aka snowflake) and two: because it’s not ‘the English way’. If we continue to support, applaud and ‘big up’, it’s felt that might result in a different outcome going forward.

Thats become one of the salient buzz words in contemporary Britain by the way.. ‘going forward’, along with ‘learning lessons’. Two phrases which conveniently overlook the importance of something that’s happened ‘now’ (it’ll be ok that we’ve fooked up because we’ll learn from it).

If Southgate wasn’t a popular public figure, the feeling of the nation today would be completely different. Different headlines would be written, he’d be slagged off to the hilt and there’d be more of a feeling of anger, than acceptance. Southgate is liked, generally, so he can be forgiven. And imagine if it was Maguire who missed the penalty! 

The fact remains, it’s failure and the UK seem to ooze if from every pore at the moment. Christ, even the ex PM had the shortest tenure of any modern day governmental leader. 
It’s a huge jump from all of this to losing another football match. But I think it’s all on the continuum of apathy, resignation and disinterest which seems to be highly pervasive at present. 
It wasn’t like this in 1996 by the way. Everything, including football felt very different.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Col city fan said:

Spot on.

We make excuses all the time and give praise to people and to things that aren’t at all praiseworthy. 
It’s become a part of the British mentality. We have kind of learnt a. To be losers and b. That’s completely acceptable. When we DO win something, OBE’s and Knighthoods are given out like confetti.

It’s bound up in the snowflake culture of the country that’s become incredibly prevalent over the past 20 years or so. Did I read that we have more people out of work and claiming welfare at present than ever before. Bound up in covid, yes, but it’s become socially acceptable to be this way too.

Just look at this forum tbf. There are as many posters claiming that England did well as there are stating that we should have done better.

We could and probably should have done better.

Snowflake culture. Benefits. Wow. What have I just read 😂

 

How on earth does that correlate to losing 2-1 to France in a close game? 

 

Reality is nobody has a divine right to win anything. Football is a game of fine margins, especially at the top level. We’ve been close the last 3 tournaments, and the future seems to be bright. Whether this is because of, or in spite of Southgate is a topic for discussion.
 

We can all point at referees, tactics, personnel and mentality but Portugal and Spain just lost to Morocco, Germany lost to Japan and Brazil lost to Croatia. It’s football, shit happens. It certainly has nothing to do with the welfare state

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Big_Nige said:

Snowflake culture. Benefits. Wow. What have I just read 😂

 

How on earth does that correlate to losing 2-1 to France in a close game? 

 

Reality is nobody has a divine right to win anything. Football is a game of fine margins, especially at the top level. We’ve been close the last 3 tournaments, and the future seems to be bright. Whether this is because of, or in spite of Southgate is a topic for discussion.
 

We can all point at referees, tactics, personnel and mentality but Portugal and Spain just lost to Morocco, Germany lost to Japan and Brazil lost to Croatia. It’s football, shit happens. It certainly has nothing to do with the welfare state

You’ve just done it now. The future of the England international team is no ‘brighter’ than it ever was. We’ve crashed out in the quarter final of a World Cup when last time we made the semi’s? That’s not progress. By any definition that’s going backwards.

Look at the informative table cited above. There’s the reality.

The honest reflection of this World Cup is that we’ve failed again as an international football team. The reasons for this are manifest and manifold. But that’s where we are at. The interesting question is how do we stop this rot.
The first thing to be is honest. And ask why?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The boy Linacre said:

Over history we have underperformed I would say.

Lets compare to Europe=
Germany 4 WC’s 3 Euros

Spain 1 WC 2 Euro’s

Italy 4 WC’s 1 Euro

France 2 WC’s 2 Euro’s

Portugal 2 WC sf 1 Euro

Netherlands 3 WCF 1 Euro

England (as big a league as top 3)

1 World Cup, 1 Euro final

Way behind the top 3, we’re comparable with Portugal & that’s wrong!!

But Southgate has got tournament results & we generally have a v good current squad.

Its luck, mentality & mindset, sadly generally we are gallant losers, that’s the distasteful but truthful fact & stats as above.

Interestingly Friday Klinsmann said we should have won the Euro’s final, but we stopped playing & handed control of the game to Italy.

Mentality again.

When I was younger the media seems to put England in the same bracket as Germany. The likes of Germany, Italy and Brazil dont see England as a superpower in football as harsh as that sounds. In the past 10 years or so I think the media have been more honest about England's standing and expectations.

 

The reality is England are in the Portugal bracket of always having a chance of winning something but almost always not happening depending on the squad at that given time. Still a better standing that over 200 FIFA nations though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...