Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Taylor Harwood-Bellis

By moore_94, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

DezFox

DezFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sideshow Faes said:

Yannick hasn't done too much wrong this season and he can't be blamed for his lack of pace if we decide to okay him in a high line. Given we're playing him I think we need to give the bloke a chance.

He is in his final year on silly money. Get rid 100%, been sold on 2 separate occasions. Lol 

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Yannick will cost us points. It’s one thing playing against Huddersfield, it will be another playing against Southampton.

  • Like 6
LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sideshow Faes said:

Yannick hasn't done too much wrong this season and he can't be blamed for his lack of pace if we decide to okay him in a high line. Given we're playing him I think we need to give the bloke a chance.

Assuming you mean Jannick*, he is the biggest liability along with Ward in out squad. We need rid ASAP. Need Coady back and this THB!

  • Like 3
lcfc sheff

lcfc sheff

Posted
Posted

I’d be happy with a buy option. (Obviously needs a year extension at Man City) would mean our defence if potentially promoted would be fairly complete for the prem with a mixture of experience and youth with great potential (assuming we’d go for Doyle as well, which so far so good). 

JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Yannick will cost us points. It’s one thing playing against Huddersfield, it will be another playing against Southampton.

Why? Are Southampton good now they've lost their midfield?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Guest Sideshow Faes

Guest Sideshow Faes

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, DezFox said:

He is in his final year on silly money. Get rid 100%, been sold on 2 separate occasions. Lol 

If an offer comes that's fine but at the moment it looks like he's going to be here and involved so I just think people need to put the past to one side and get behind him

gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, DezFox said:

He is in his final year on silly money. Get rid 100%, been sold on 2 separate occasions. Lol 

Doesn't look like there is any interest in him. It looks like we will have to bite the bullet & keep him for the season.

I don't see him playing much when Coady returns !

An Sionnach

An Sionnach

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, gurru991 said:

Doesn't look like there is any interest in him. It looks like we will have to bite the bullet & keep him for the season.

I don't see him playing much when Coady returns !

A week is a long time in football , don't bet your house on it.

CaliFOXnia

CaliFOXnia

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, coolhandfox said:

We went down because we had no leaders or characters!

 

You have to have a blend of young talent and a few old heads. 

 

It is about the sum of the parts, not just the individual parts. 

 

Why can't we have Coady and THB? 

 

Probably because we won't spend the money to get him. Due, in large part, to our atrocious recruitment model mentioned which sees us struggling to offload players on astronomical wages. 

  • Like 1
coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, CaliFOXnia said:

Probably because we won't spend the money to get him. Due, in large part, to our atrocious recruitment model mentioned which sees us struggling to offload players on astronomical wages. 

We will see.

Sunbury Fox

Sunbury Fox

Posted
Posted (edited)

Given our apparent inability to move on squad players, we already stand to start the season with 5 senior GKs, 5 senior CBs and 5 senior FBs still on the books, all on big money. Given this, surely we need to shift some of these players before we think about buying yet another defender?

 

In any case whilst I don't doubt this guy is a good player, would he even start when Coady is fit as you'd think the first choice back 3 then would be Faes, Coady and Doyle. Yes, you could argue that Doyle would drop out but with the inverted full back on the right we surely need a left footer on the left side of defence, as per the Man City system and THB is a right footer.

 

If we have money available I'm strongly of the view that we need to spend it on wingers, not a CB - compared to the phalanx of GKs and defenders we have, we have only 1 senior first choice winger, which leaves us very vulnerable, I think. 

 

Having said all that, maybe Coady's injury is worse than they've said and/or we plan to sell Faes; otherwise, I'm struggling to see this potential transfer as a priority. 

Edited by Sunbury Fox
  • Like 3
FrankieADZ

FrankieADZ

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said:

Having said all that, maybe Coady's injury is worse than they've said and/or we plan to sell Faes; otherwise, I'm struggling to see this potential transfer as a priority. 

why do people keeping thinking we want to get rid of Faes, been said now for the 2nd summer in a row we want to move on Vestergaard. for me he fits alot less than Faes, JV is less mobile and worse in the air(dunno how)

the club will want least what they paid for him and i doubt any turkish team will

THB does tick all the boxes we'd want in terms of a defender imo

Edited by FrankieADZ
  • Like 1
Sunbury Fox

Sunbury Fox

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

why do people keeping thinking we want to get rid of Faes, been said now for the 2nd summer in a row we want to move on Vestergaard. for me he fits alot less than Faes, JV is less mobile and worse in the air(dunno how)

the club will want least what they paid for him and i doubt any turkish team will

THB does tick all the boxes we'd want in terms of a defender imo

I'm not saying we want to get rid of Faes but if we get the right offer from a club he wants to join then we might decide to cash in. Ideally we would sell Vesty but nobody is going to offer him the wages we are paying so he'll see out the last year of his contract, I suspect. 

hackneyfox

hackneyfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Sunbury Fox said:

Given our apparent inability to move on squad players, we already stand to start the season with 5 senior GKs, 5 senior CBs and 5 senior FBs still on the books, all on big money. Given this, surely we need to shift some of these players before we think about buying yet another defender?

 

In any case whilst I don't doubt this guy is a good player, would he even start when Coady is fit as you'd think the first choice back 3 then would be Faes, Coady and Doyle. Yes, you could argue that Doyle would drop out but with the inverted full back on the right we surely need a left footer on the left side of defence, as per the Man City system and THB is a right footer.

 

If we have money available I'm strongly of the view that we need to spend it on wingers, not a CB - compared to the phalanx of GKs and defenders we have, we have only 1 senior first choice winger, which leaves us very vulnerable, I think. 

 

Having said all that, maybe Coady's injury is worse than they've said and/or we plan to sell Faes; otherwise, I'm struggling to see this potential transfer as a priority. 

So you think those 3 can play 46 plus cup games? We need a fourth option who is actually a CB not a makeshift one.

adejo92

adejo92

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, JimJams said:

Why? Are Southampton good now they've lost their midfield?

They will be one of the better teams still, but i think the OP was more alluding to the fact that someone like Che Adams or Armstrong are much less likely to fluff the kind of chances that the Cov strikers did.

 

The Cov result was a good one, but lets not forget they should have been out of sight had it not been for none league level finishing.

blaaklint

blaaklint

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, FrankieADZ said:

why do people keeping thinking we want to get rid of Faes, been said now for the 2nd summer in a row we want to move on Vestergaard. for me he fits alot less than Faes, JV is less mobile and worse in the air(dunno how)

the club will want least what they paid for him and i doubt any turkish team will

THB does tick all the boxes we'd want in terms of a defender imo

wout this season has won 0 out of 3 aerial duels. jannik is 5 from 8.  vestergaard also has a better record than faes over the last five seasons.

 

wout is definitely faster tho

FrankieADZ

FrankieADZ

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, blaaklint said:

wout this season has won 0 out of 3 aerial duels. jannik is 5 from 8.  vestergaard also has a better record than faes over the last five seasons.

 

wout is definitely faster tho

yeah but come on, Vestergaard even said he wanted out, and hes not mobile or quick enough to be a starter or even on the bench for me, dont get me wrong hes doing a decent job atm, but we should just get rid, 

 

Jannik might be 5 from 8 but most of the time he dont have to jump to head it and when he does he seems to get smaller

gurru991

gurru991

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, FrankieADZ said:

yeah but come on, Vestergaard even said he wanted out, and hes not mobile or quick enough to be a starter or even on the bench for me, dont get me wrong hes doing a decent job atm, but we should just get rid, 

 

Jannik might be 5 from 8 but most of the time he dont have to jump to head it and when he does he seems to get smaller

I'm not sure I can remember such a tall defender who is so poor in the air ... I think Mendy was better aerially  !!

Edited by gurru991
MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, JimJams said:

Why? Are Southampton good now they've lost their midfield?


 

to be fair we have lost our midfield and are doing ok…

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...