Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
StanSP

Premier League 2024/25

By StanSP, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

LcFc_Smiv

LcFc_Smiv

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cwyj7506y5jo

 

 

What a cute way of thinking 🥰

It's a result of the product created by the Premier League, Sky and a number of the clubs. Even if the title race and battle for relegation had a bit more about them, you would still be watching a heavily commercialised product with very little emotion in the stands and on the pitch, interrupted every 10-15 mins by a VAR check, while commentators and pundits alike turn all topics of conversation back to the big 6.

Sol thewall Bamba

Sol thewall Bamba

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cwyj7506y5jo

 

 

What a cute way of thinking 🥰

Complete oversaturation of football, boring modern possession based style yielding less shots on target year after year, people cutting back on subscriptions due to the cost, Man Utd being shit, plus the fact that 7/8 teams in the league are just objectively small football clubs that neutrals don't want to watch. 

  • Like 3
LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cwyj7506y5jo

 

 

What a cute way of thinking 🥰

To be fair, it looks about right to me.

 

An uncompetitive league with no jeopardy, as a result of the PSR nonsense creating such imbalance has put people off watching as surprise surprise, people watch English football for the culture of the competitiveness and ups and downs. Almost like it’s not just about the big teams and big name players.

 

And the point about multiple to packages causing illegal streaming also very fair.

  • Like 1
kenny

kenny

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

So many different kick off times
VAR
Ability to watch online
Quick and easy access highlights
Cost

Must all play a part too .

You missed out VAR a couple more times.

 

Also, the dilution of atmospheres at the grounds under the guise of increased tourism and improving the atmosphere for families has sanitised the experience of following football.

BKLFox

BKLFox

Posted
Posted

The sheer cost will have people turning off, you see adverts to get sky for £16pm but then when you add channels you want & sports, ooh & you have to have a different HD package for sports not the general Tv with HD it jumps up by £40pm, add in a TNT subscription anther £30 and cinema you could be paying anywhere between £100-180+pm, the latter end of that being out of contract, but still if your not confident in haggling then it’s just to much, also when you factor in BB, other streaming subs etc 

 

Picking sky tv contract / channels is like picking an energy contract, there are to many and most our intertwined in that if you drop x you lose y etc

  • Like 1
  • Popular Post
Lionator

Lionator

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Trent smashing out fluent Spanish in his real unveiling is one of the more badass things I’ve seen recently. Scousers are going to be rattled.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 17
Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Lionator said:

Trent smashing out fluent Spanish in his real unveiling is one of the more badass things I’ve seen recently. Scousers are going to be rattled.

Been having lessons for ages then!

Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Complete oversaturation of football, boring modern possession based style yielding less shots on target year after year, people cutting back on subscriptions due to the cost, Man Utd being shit, plus the fact that 7/8 teams in the league are just objectively small football clubs that neutrals don't want to watch. 

As much as they tried, a race to finish fifth is not interesting in most seasons, let alone the main issue.

 

Not surprised the interest has waned.

fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, Tuna said:

 

It'll be interesting how he does there. He has done wonders at Brentford, but it's his club and it just fits. Let see how it goes spurs. 

 

One thing is for sure, he'll be boring compared to brash Aussie Ange 

sm1

sm1

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Lionator said:

Trent smashing out fluent Spanish in his real unveiling is one of the more badass things I’ve seen recently. Scousers are going to be rattled.

He's rubbing there noses in it. I suppose they're going to go back to booing him now.

CrispinLA in Texas

CrispinLA in Texas

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, BKLFox said:

The sheer cost will have people turning off, you see adverts to get sky for £16pm but then when you add channels you want & sports, ooh & you have to have a different HD package for sports not the general Tv with HD it jumps up by £40pm, add in a TNT subscription anther £30 and cinema you could be paying anywhere between £100-180+pm, the latter end of that being out of contract, but still if your not confident in haggling then it’s just to much, also when you factor in BB, other streaming subs etc 

 

Picking sky tv contract / channels is like picking an energy contract, there are to many and most our intertwined in that if you drop x you lose y etc

Just get an IPTV box and watch everything from sport, movies and TV shows for £100 a year

PAULCFC

PAULCFC

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

Just get an IPTV box and watch everything from sport, movies and TV shows for £100 a year

Yep.....just invested in the FS 4k max and a good iptv provider..........Flawless!

 

  • Like 2
Phenom

Phenom

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PAULCFC said:

Yep.....just invested in the FS 4k max and a good iptv provider..........Flawless!

 

Share the IPTV provider with me please

Lionator

Lionator

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Super_horns said:

Kieran McKenna and Scott Parker has been linked to replace Frank .

Brentford fans might hope for someone more proven at PL level ?

McKenna is still a quality manager and would do well under that setup I think. 

  • Like 1
Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Lionator said:

McKenna is still a quality manager and would do well under that setup I think. 

Probably true if given the time but you know the media anyway will look to his Ipswich record in the league even though that was always going to be very tough.

shen

shen

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, CloudFox said:

Sad for him and Brentford. Good luck to him, but I'm pretty sure this is going to end in tears.

He's not realistically going to get offered a better job until he proves himself with a team like Spurs. You can argue the conditions are perfect for him. He should be able to improve on 17th and he'll get some European football experience too.

Will he bring along some Brentford players too?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...