Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, BKLFox said:

To understand Skipp is to understand the position but sadly I’m not sure armchair managers do, they see a price tag, a wage & don’t hear his name in a game therefore he’s shite.

 

If I was to ask, name a standout player from Man U between 1992-2004 the list will go like, Becks, Scholes, Cantona, Giggs, Keane, RVN, Cole, York etc not many will mention Nicky Butt if at all yet a lot of those players were dependent on Butt doing the simple things, even Carrick didn’t get the recognition in that role until near the end of his career & neither got as many England caps as they should because the role wasn’t sexy enough and it was all about can Scholes, Lampard & Gerrard or the fair players of “a” time play together & put simply no because you needed a Butt in the team to do the simple mundane churn things, intercept, recycle 3m pass to a flair player and go again.

 

Now I’m not saying he’s a Butt, Carrick, Kante but he does a lot more than people think in a game it’s just that it’s unspectacular. He’s not doing 30yrd diagonal crosses to the wingers, he’s not steaming into the box to get on the end of a cut back or threading Tielemens style thru-balls into the forwards but that’s not the position’s role.

 

We need money and if someone was to offer good money then I’d take it and get Collins in for sure but if they don’t I’d expect Skipp to be 1 of the 1st names on the sheet not because of his price tag or assumed wage but because he’s probably the best we currently have at doing the churn.

 

Does he actually do the churn though?

 

A DM that does that would either have high numbers for tackles/ground duels or interceptions.

 

Skipp from memory doesn’t stand out in either.

 
It’s ok to admit that Skipp has been financially an awful signing.

 

He doesn’t appear to be a douche like Winks, Faes and Jannik etc but he’s one of many reasons, as to why we have declined so much since Cooper.

Posted
6 hours ago, Chief Keef said:

I’m still not convinced. Yes he doesn’t often lose it but he doesn’t move it quickly enough and is too slow to make himself an option for our defence at times. 
 

That and defensively he doesn’t fill me with confidence, too often is he second to loose balls in the midfield. 

An option from our defence means a suicide ball, no where near you or smashed at your face or knackers, I don't blame him:ph34r:

Posted

Absolutely honking today. He gave the ball away cheaply and looks so slow. 

Another that would struggle to find a club if we released him. 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, funkyrobot said:

I worry about this lad as a single pivot even at this level. Too slow to react, slow on the ball, doesn’t put enough pace into his pass. Not particularly creative to counter that lack of pace. He’s not a pinger of a passer, doesn’t carry the ball with much intensity and he’s only ok defensively. Can’t help thinking if we dropped (and sold?) Skipp and played Braybrooke there we would benefit from his more creative and fast single pivot qualities and then we’d also be able to bring in even more quality into the team to start like Page or Howell. 

100% spot on! Kept under hitting his passes all game and keeps tripping over the ball. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Reckon Winks was actually more beneficial to the team than him when he played despite his public outbursts.

Edited by Wymsey
  • Like 2
Posted

I just cannot fathom how you cannot see any obvious discernible quality difference between him and Notts County's players. I really think he might be one of those who retire before 30.

  • Like 1
Posted

As others have correctly mentioned a huge waste of money.
have to take any offers for him and just move him on. If any interest just sell. He doesn’t come across as a negative person and always tries. Just he is not very good. 

certainly should not play as a 6 again.that should be Braybrooke. 

Posted

He was absolutely awful. I’m struggling to think of a player with a worse touch, on either side, yesterday. It was just embarrassing. 

  • Like 3
Posted

His athleticism his below average for a position that requires covering a lot of ground and being able to spring for the loose ball. He is often not where he needs to be and was left wanting yesterday. He has no discernable attacking qualities so he is pretty poor. That pivot requires crisp first time passes under pressure which Winks could do say 95% of the time. Skipp more like 70% which is too low. I called him top 5 worst ever signings with £ involved and I stand by it even though some disagreed. Rudkin should never work in football again for sanctioning that deal.

  • Like 3
Posted

Should never be starting I could run around quicker, he rarely gets near a player cause he so slow get him out the team ffs all he does is pass 5 yards and get in the way and looks like a big baby running around in a football kit 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I’ve oddly defended Skipp at times.
 

However, yesterday was one poor performance too much.

 

As others have stated, he had a trampoline first touch yesterday.

 

Between him and Thomas, I genuinely saw more loose first touches than I did/do when playing football at the weekends.

 

What do they practice in training and not see this when analysing the game?

Edited by SafewayFox
  • Like 1
Posted
On 09/08/2026 at 10:41, BKLFox said:

To understand Skipp is to understand the position but sadly I’m not sure armchair managers do, they see a price tag, a wage & don’t hear his name in a game therefore he’s shite.

 

If I was to ask, name a standout player from Man U between 1992-2004 the list will go like, Becks, Scholes, Cantona, Giggs, Keane, RVN, Cole, York etc not many will mention Nicky Butt if at all yet a lot of those players were dependent on Butt doing the simple things, even Carrick didn’t get the recognition in that role until near the end of his career & neither got as many England caps as they should because the role wasn’t sexy enough and it was all about can Scholes, Lampard & Gerrard or the fair players of “a” time play together & put simply no because you needed a Butt in the team to do the simple mundane churn things, intercept, recycle 3m pass to a flair player and go again.

 

Now I’m not saying he’s a Butt, Carrick, Kante but he does a lot more than people think in a game it’s just that it’s unspectacular. He’s not doing 30yrd diagonal crosses to the wingers, he’s not steaming into the box to get on the end of a cut back or threading Tielemens style thru-balls into the forwards but that’s not the position’s role.

 

We need money and if someone was to offer good money then I’d take it and get Collins in for sure but if they don’t I’d expect Skipp to be 1 of the 1st names on the sheet not because of his price tag or assumed wage but because he’s probably the best we currently have at doing the churn.

 

Incredibly patronising post this.

 

I think that people on here are quite capable of appreciating the water carriers.  They are also quite capable of calling out garbage when they see it.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...