Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Man city wont get top four next season not with Enzo 

 

Hopefully they also get the deserved point deduction for being complete cheats 

Posted
4 hours ago, em9999 said:

Yeah it must really suck to be premier league champions 

 

Meanwhile its great to be us losing our best talent 

 

 

What 

lol I was being light hearted, and definitely not serious, I thought that much was obvious. 

 

I've accepted Monga is going, do I like it, nope. He could get swallowed up in the system as a club like Man City. Arsenal was his better bet, tbh as they promote youth more often. 

 

Im fully aware it's a awful situation and I don't want to lose our best talent. I certainly want to hold on to the rest, but this was always going to happen, I think, even if we were in the championship. 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, DezFox said:

Not denying him anything, just think we should get more money in today’s market. Quite simple, fine if you don’t agree. 

I still think £10m for a 16 year old L1 player, who has potential, and that's all it is at the moment, is a decent price. If he'd made the odd cameo in the Prem like say Max Dowman, I'd accept £10m is quite a low valuation. Would Leicester be willing to pay £10m for an unproven 16 year old from L 1 if they were in the Prem and what would the reaction to that be on here, irrespective of whether or not we had the same resources as Man. City.

  • Like 4
Posted
24 minutes ago, MGLCFC said:

I still think £10m for a 16 year old L1 player, who has potential, and that's all it is at the moment, is a decent price. If he'd made the odd cameo in the Prem like say Max Dowman, I'd accept £10m is quite a low valuation. Would Leicester be willing to pay £10m for an unproven 16 year old from L 1 if they were in the Prem and what would the reaction to that be on here, irrespective of whether or not we had the same resources as Man. City.

He did play the odd prem cameo, in fact made Forest defence look silly at times.

However in our state 10 million needs to be grabbed, and fortunately he’s not had enough cameo’s here to fall in love with.

  • Like 1
Posted

So lets says we get £10 million - how much can he spent of the pure homegrown profit?

 

does it get absorbed by the years of losses?

 

Or can we only spend X% amount or is it different for homegrown sales? 

Posted
10 hours ago, em9999 said:

Man city wont get top four next season not with Enzo 

 

Hopefully they also get the deserved point deduction for being complete cheats 

Way more likely that they comfortably win the league under Enzo than not finish top four. 

Posted

10 million plus a sell on fee. It's not much but he's 16 and still got everything to prove, we've only seen flashes of what he can do so far

Posted (edited)

A Man City mate of mine who is quite savvy on these matters is suggesting that the initial fee is way below 50% of the £10 million package.

 

Arsenal pulling out isn’t anything to do with them not liking him but the fact that LCFC pushed too hard. The only club prepared to  talk about even close to decent numbers is Man City

 

I should also add that the club will struggle to match the agreed wage sum that is in the current agreement and is the basis of the contract . That  offer would put him close to the highest, if not the highest earners of players , and still at the club, who signed contracts in the last two years.
 

Finally based on numbers despite age if he remains at the club he will feature in the 26/27 SCMP numbers.

Edited by Terraloon
Posted

The buying club and it's fans will always pretend the fee is less than it is and vice versa with the selling club adamant it's more.

 

If some Man City fan is telling you the fee is 5 million quid they're probably talking out of their arse

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

The buying club and it's fans will always pretend the fee is less than it is and vice versa with the selling club adamant it's more.

 

If some Man City fan is telling you the fee is 5 million quid they're probably talking out of their arse

He actually didn’t say £5m he said way less than 50%.

 

 

Edited by Terraloon
Posted
Just now, Muzzy_no7 said:

Surely we loan him back? 

Why?

 

We shouldn't develop someone else's player, even if they came through our Academy. Monga is a wonderful prospect of course, but we would be carrying him next season and he wont be a match winner in L1 next season. Loans should be to enhance the squad, and developing players should be left to this in our academy.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Miquel The Work Geordie said:

 

Initial point still stands imo

It does but my point was far too many expecting £10 m which would be staggering if achieved but everything I hear is that isn’t close to the initial payment 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Surely we loan him back? 

Reading between the lines from previous posts he doesn't want to be here next season at all

Posted
59 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

I don't think £10m for an unproven 16yr old is bad business - yes would be great to hold onto him and develop him at LCFC but we're a league one club now FFS. 

Absolutely. If we had been relegated purely by on the pitch matters but the club was in decent financial health, maybe we’d hold more cards in trying to squeeze a little more. But everyone and Vesty’s dog in football know that we are in a mess still and will need to make these sales. So they hold the cards.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, good deal for all concerned now lets please get some signings in. It's literally, been years.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...