Tielemans63 Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 hey! Take that back. He's a legend at Wealdstone.
Babylon Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Personally, I wanted him to stay, rather than go out on loan to one of our rivals, particularly if we, which I assume we are doing, are still paying part of his wages. Doesn't make sense to pay for him to score goals for someone else. I think with a run in the team he would have scored goals for us. Vardy has had a good run, with lots of hustle and bustle, but hasn't really suggested that he'll be a regular scorer at this level. Hopefully loaning him out will mean that we loan a striker in, perhaps someone like Kenwyne Jones, because as mentioned above, our current crop of strikers I don't think will score us enough goals to take us up. He's had a run in the sodding team, he had 39 starts last year and scored in 7 games. Vardy so far has a better gpg ratio in league, and league and cup. It's only been 7-8 games so it's difficult to say for certain what he will do long term. But a lad from non league is scoring at a better rate than Beckford did and working hard to go with it.
Grey Fox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Huddersfield is the best team we could of sent him to, they aren't imo going to be promotion rivals at all so we haven't got much to worry about as a certain DJ Campbell situation arises and even then one man isn't going to be the difference?, so as long as we get a replacement in the loan window or permanent transfer incoming come January I will be happy. Famous last words
lestajigs Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 We still talking about beckford 💤💤💤💤💤💤
Happy Fox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Famous last words I will probably get egg on my face by making that statement but who cares as long as we go up that is all that matters not one individual player who hasn't really delivered the goods.
RonnieTodger Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 2 hours in and my Fifa team is ruined already This. It's like Pearson doesn't even care.
woznotwos Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Shit shit decision. Why Waghorn is ahead of Beckford is beyond me. Hope this doesn't come back to haunt us... Wages are also a factor dont forget !
Guest Col city fan Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 It's only a 93 day 'emergency loan' whatever that means.
NewburyFox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Interesting point from Stringer, Beckford on 49 appearances for us, maybe we'd have to give Everton some more money for his 50th appearance? Jason Beckford
marko Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Interesting point from Stringer, Beckford on 49 appearances for us, maybe we'd have to give Everton some more money for his 50th appearance? Jason Beckford He's actually on 48 appearances, but I guess the facts don't matter to speculative idiots like Ian!
NewburyFox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 He's actually on 48 appearances, but I guess the facts don't matter to speculative idiots like Ian! He's on 49 if you include the FA and League Cup
marko Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 He's on 49 if you include the FA and League Cup Incorrect. 2011-2012 League 39 + 4 FA Cup 2012-2013 League 4 + 1 League Cup Total 48
Bettsj2 Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 He's on 49 if you include the FA and League Cup You'd have to be a pretty shit negotiator to agree a 50 appearance clause.
NewburyFox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Incorrect. 2011-2012 League 39 + 4 FA Cup 2012-2013 League 4 + 1 League Cup Total 48 Also incorrect. Check Beckford's stats page, 40 starts, 9 sub appearances, there's a break down of the teams that his appearances come against. And yes, I imagine that it's purely coincidence.
marko Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Also incorrect. Check Beckford's stats page, 40 starts, 9 sub appearances, there's a break down of the teams that his appearances come against. And yes, I imagine that it's purely coincidence. I'm sorry, but you're wrong. The stats provided by the Football League, LCFC OS and Press Association all have Beckford on 48 appearances - in the exact breakdown I've given. I'm guessing you're going by Wikipedia.
NewburyFox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 I'm sorry, but you're wrong. The stats provided by the Football League, LCFC OS and Press Association all have Beckford on 48 appearances - in the exact breakdown I've given. I'm guessing you're going by Wikipedia. No, Wiki has him down on 48. I'm going by the Stats page on FT, which has him on 49. 40 starts, 9 sub appearances. He's play 43 times for us in the NPC, 5 times in the FA Cup and once in the League Cup. Like I said there's a list on his stats page of what teams his appearances have come against, and they add up to 49.
bluesbrothers Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Muck Fee! I've been out of the loop a couple of days, I had no idea this had actually happened. Finally.
marko Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 No, Wiki has him down on 48. I'm going by the Stats page on FT, which has him on 49. 40 starts, 9 sub appearances. He's play 43 times for us in the NPC, 5 times in the FA Cup and once in the League Cup. Like I said there's a list on his stats page of what teams his appearances have come against, and they add up to 49. Well either FT is wrong, or FL, LCFC and PA are wrong. Either way, it's pure speculation by Stringer with no foundation whatsoever and it's bound to attract idiots who link it to NP.
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Huddersfield one up, wasn't Beckford scoring though. Yet
The Doctor Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 No, Wiki has him down on 48. I'm going by the Stats page on FT, which has him on 49. 40 starts, 9 sub appearances. He's play 43 times for us in the NPC, 5 times in the FA Cup and once in the League Cup. Like I said there's a list on his stats page of what teams his appearances have come against, and they add up to 49. That's wrong though - he's got 42 league appearances.
Kierzz Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 This has annoyed me so much Beckford has more potential than any other striker in the team if we get him playing, like he will do at Huddersfield. Schlupp should have produced by now, he's going on 20 and he can't even make the bench. With time and good managing Beckford can get 20-30 goals a season and Grayson will give him that. Just you wait he will do a DJ at Huddersfield. This is a f****** joke
Mark Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Incorrect. 2011-2012 League 39 + 4 FA Cup 2012-2013 League 4 + 1 League Cup Total 48 Beckford made 5 appearances in the FA Cup last season. http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/page/GamesPerSeason.php?season=2011&pid=1145
marko Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Beckford made 5 appearances in the FA Cup last season. http://www.foxestalk...n=2011&pid=1145 That might be where the discrepancy is then. On LCFC, FL and PA he's only been listed as playing 4 in the FA Cup.
Babylon Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 This has annoyed me so much Beckford has more potential than any other striker in the team if we get him playing, like he will do at Huddersfield. Schlupp should have produced by now, he's going on 20 and he can't even make the bench. With time and good managing Beckford can get 20-30 goals a season and Grayson will give him that. Just you wait he will do a DJ at Huddersfield. This is a f****** joke Potential? He's 28 and never scored more than 9 league goals above league one. How much time does he need what's he had 39 league starts and scored in 7 games. Vardy has scored in two games from seven and gets slated. Maybe he can score 20, but he's shown little he's capable of doing that. His performances on the whole have been poor.
5waller5 Posted 29 September 2012 Posted 29 September 2012 Get in!! ooops ... thought this was the match thread!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.