cjslcfc Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 If we go down I would swipe that money out of spurs bank account and let Mahrez go the fact we got Albrighton sitting on the side lines as Mahrez is 1 of Pearson's favourites does my head in when ever Albrighton has played for us he has been our best player on the pitch and changes games!!!! Just re-read this again and realised I hadn't picked up on another magical part. Mahrez is such a "favourite" that Pearson inexplicably dropped him for a few games earlier in the season. I thought he didn't drop his favourites? Or am I getting this wrong?
Sunbury Fox Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 And which games are you talking about here - when did we in fact turn a match around with Albrighton on the pitch? Spurs away in the Cup when his introduction was key to our victory. He also did well v Newcastle in the Cup - it was 0-0 when he came on and we went on to win the game 1-0. Also had a good game v Villa at home. They were his last 3 appearances. Nobody is saying he is Ronaldo. But surely he should be at least on the bench?
Guest Col city fan Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 If we stay up, this man will be key. I think he's much better than any of our other strikers.
Unabomber Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 If we stay up, this man will be key. I think he's much better than any of our other strikers. You could say he unlocks defences
Alf Bentley Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 If we stay up, this man will be key. I think he's much better than any of our other strikers. You could say he unlocks defences Important that Huth acts as the padlock on our back door, too.
Guest Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Kramaric has looked as though he's worth 2m. Chelsea won't want him.
adam Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Hes never a left winger. He needs to be in the 6 yard box. Another tactical masterpiece by pearson
Bryn Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Dreadful today, partly because it is unclear what his role is. Thought we looked better when he drifted central and sat in the hole.
Donut Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 I was really disappointed with him today. Was snatching at chances, poor decision making, and lack of bravery from the wonderful cross by Mahrez. Couldnt come off soon enough today.
Guest Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Hes never a left winger. He needs to be in the 6 yard box. Another tactical masterpiece by pearson He looks frightened of going into the 18yd box let alone the 6 yd box. Schluup comes past him on the wing, he gives him the ball then drops backwards and outwards. I've been very disappointed.
RowlattsFox Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Poor today but he seemed to be playing in an inside left position.
ADK Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Eventually his new player grace period will wear off and people will realise he's been no improvement on Nugent.
Arriba Los Zorros Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 he's poor, has nothing going for him physically and is too afraid to put himself about. very very disappointed by Karamric
Lovejoy Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Break your transfer record on a striker and play him out of position. Good work Pearson.
ScouseFox Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 he weren't very good. he sold the whole ground and both sets of players a dummy on the edge of their box second half tho that was a real delight.
kingfox Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Looked like a lost kid who has come from Calais in a back of a lorry.
Raj Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 I've said it before...Pearson could make sergio aguero into a £1million player by playing him in the wrong position!!!
Donut Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Surely a striker with his prolific record behind him would relish that chance that Mahrez crafted for him, not duck his head away. Thats my overriding memory of his contribution today, not up for it.
smudger63 Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 To be honest, he must be thinking what the hell have i come into. So far he has played up front on his own, something he said in an interview, that he hadn`t done before, then today he`s moved out to the left so that Vardy can play down the middle. He is probably as confused about what the manager is trying to do, as most of the rest of us!
Clever Fox Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 To be fair to the lad he's only had 2 months training with us. He needs to bulk up a bit. With the tactics he's been asked to use is it any wonder he's struggling to score.
BlueJoe Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Don't you lot realise that the negative attacking style we have is 100% down to Pearson? We played the same last year! Run into the corner then cut back and pass it out again!!! It's shocking!!! We need a new manager NOW! The dice needs to be rolled again 10 games is enough time and we have nothing to lose! Kramaric IS good enough we haven't seen him play where he needs to though (in the number 10 roll where he scored his goals from) Id play ----------- Schmeichel DeLaet Was Huth/Upson Simpson -------Cambiasso James Vardy ----- Kramaric ----- Albrighton ---------------- Ulloa Width, pace, protection and power!!!! Just hope their was a hidden meaning to O'Neil being in the stands today!!!
Lisac Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 Abysmal. 99/100 managers would play Kramaric is the middle and Vardy on the wing. You just can't defend that decision.
TOMBlcfc Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 I wish we could combine him and vardy somehow. If he had more pace i think he would be deadly. Unfortunately atm he struggles to create his own chances
BlueJoe Posted 14 March 2015 Posted 14 March 2015 I wish we could combine him and vardy somehow. If he had more pace i think he would be deadly. Unfortunately atm he struggles to create his own chances We don't need to combine them we need to play them bth in their ideal position! Vardy on the wing and Kramaric as a number 10
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.