Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
sylofox

Premier League Thread 2018/19 stuff it in here.

By sylofox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Nalis

Nalis

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, RumbleFox said:

Just saw the Fabinho dive again, disgusting. Can't believe more hasn't been made of it.  For that alone I don't want them to win the league. X 

How the linesman didnt say to the ref that it was dive I dont know.

 

If we plsy really well tonight and lose 4-3 tonight to a dodgy decision then Liverpool fans cant complain. I could live with that scenario too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Nalis said:

How the linesman didnt say to the ref that it was dive I dont know.

 

If we plsy really well tonight and lose 4-3 tonight to a dodgy decision then Liverpool fans cant complain. I could live with that scenario too.

Er....the lino gave it ........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan LCFC

Dan LCFC

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Langston said:

 

Maybe he's just a 21 year old who isn't the finished product yet, but still has a reasonable goals : games return for someone his age who often plays out wide? I hate terms like "fraud" and "myth" in relation to football - he's just a really good young player who if anything has been a victim of the great goalscoring start he made to his first team career.

Sorry, I just don't really get the fuss with him. I agree he can definitely get better but I've never understood this almost unanimous feeling that he's better than Vardy. Where is the evidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Dan LCFC said:

Sorry, I just don't really get the fuss with him. I agree he can definitely get better but I've never understood this almost unanimous feeling that he's better than Vardy. Where is the evidence?

Rashford is a great player. I'd swap him straight up with Vards - who is a legend. We'd be set for the next decade.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites
don_danbury

don_danbury

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Dan LCFC said:

Sorry, I just don't really get the fuss with him. I agree he can definitely get better but I've never understood this almost unanimous feeling that he's better than Vardy. Where is the evidence?

i think even utd fans don't think that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, FIF said:

Rashford is a great player. I'd swap him straight up with Vards - who is a legend. We'd be set for the next decade.

Okay what about a swap for Maguire then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
murphy

murphy

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheik's plaything.

4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

6. Man City are boring to watch

7. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

 

 

Edited by murphy
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
Just now, murphy said:

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheiks's plaything.

4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

6. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

 

 

The only reason that I want Mancs to win it, is that I want the PL winners club to stay as small as it is. At this moment we can still "brag" to Liverpool that we've won more PL titles than they have, and more recently been Champions of England.

 

Having said that I want us to win by as many goals as possible this evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted

If the scousers promised not to go on forever preaching about how their win is the best ever and half the population of Leicester promised not to drive around honking their horns on Sunday evening then I could just about cope with the pool winning it ........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rachhere

rachhere

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, FIF said:

Rashford is a great player. I'd swap him straight up with Vards - who is a legend. We'd be set for the next decade.

I think he's alright - wouldn't swap him with Vards though! He's inconsistent, but he's only 21 which is so young for a striker playing at the top levels in the Premier League. He has the ability to come on and turn a game round. 

 

45 minutes ago, murphy said:

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

 2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

 3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheiks's plaything.

 4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

 5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

 6. Man City are boring to watch

 7. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

  

 

All of the above :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Milo

Milo

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, murphy said:

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheiks's plaything.

4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

6. Man City are boring to watch

7. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

 

 

Solid, rational arguments, those. :thumbup:

 

Especially agree with 7

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hollyfox

Hollyfox

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, murphy said:

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheiks's plaything.

4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

6. Man City are boring to watch

7. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

 

 

Most of these are funny. 

Number 6 is plain outrageous. 

Do you like football? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Buce

Buce

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, murphy said:

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheiks's plaything.

4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

6. Man City are boring to watch

7. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

 

 

 

This. A thousand times this (especially number 2)

 

Vindictive? Me? :o

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
murphy

murphy

Posted
Posted
Just now, Hollyfox said:

Most of these are funny. 

Number 6 is plain outrageous. 

Do you like football? ?

Yeah.  Genuinely I think they are dismal to watch.

 

They routinely have 70% + possession and their tippy tap style bores me.  Watching them is like watching a defence v attack training session.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, murphy said:

I don't really understand the anti-Liverpool/Pro-Manchester bias.

 

I for one, hope it goes to Liverpool:
 

Reasons why Liverpool should win the title:

 

1.  Liverpool didn't shaft us by selling us Iheanacho

2. I'd like Mahrez to miss out on a medal (especially if it's us that stopped it).

3. Man City are only in the title race because they are a super-rich Sheiks's plaything.

4. We owe them for the 69 cup final

5. It makes the title race more interesting to have a challenge to Manchester's dominance.

6. Man City are boring to watch

7. Man City's kit looks a bit like Cov's

 

 

Not sure anyone is 'pro' Man City, as I said the other day they're just the lesser of two evils.

If it wasn't for the Liverpool fanbase i'd probably want them to win the league if i'm honest but their fans will be unbearable if they win the league, for that simple reason is why a large majority of the country don't want Liverpool to win the league.

 

24 minutes ago, Fightforever said:

Personally I just want revenge for the carabao cup

had we beat man city I genuinely believe we would have won the cup

We only have ourselves to blame that night, well not ourselves but without opening the can of worms again, our management at the time.

 

Revenge would suggest Man City did something wrong - I'm not sure they have any part to blame as such.

 

The scenario we found ourselves in to play such a weakened side we deserved to lose. If we treated it abit more respectfully, went with our strongest team I have no doubts we'd have won.

 

Edited by Matt
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Matt

Matt

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, murphy said:

Yeah.  Genuinely I think they are dismal to watch.

 

They routinely have 70% + possession and their tippy tap style bores me.  Watching them is like watching a defence v attack training session.

 

 

I agree with that, I don't understand the wankfest over Man City, they are incredibly boring.

 

As i've said i'd probably want Liverpool to win the league if it their fanbase wasn't such an issue but unfortunately that overrules it all.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
murphy

murphy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Matt said:

Not sure anyone is 'pro' Man City, as I said the other day they're just the lesser of two evils.

If it wasn't for the Liverpool fanbase i'd probably want them to win the league if i'm honest, but their fans will be unbearable if they win the league, for that simple reason is why a large majority of the country don't want Liverpool to win the league.

 

We only have ourselves to blame from that, well not ourselves but without opening the can of worms again, our management at the time. Revenge would suggest Man City did something wrong - I'm not sure they have any part to blame as such.

 

The scenario we found ourselves in to play such a weakened side we deserved to lose. If we treated it abit more respectfully went with our strongest team I have no doubt we'd have won.

Perhaps not you, but many have darkened these pages by saying that they hope we lose tonight.

 

Gobshitery of the highest order, that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan LCFC

Dan LCFC

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, FIF said:

Rashford is a great player. I'd swap him straight up with Vards - who is a legend. We'd be set for the next decade.

Nah sorry can't agree what so ever. He's got age over Vardy and that's about it.

 

I don't even think he's bad I just think he hugely gets away with it in all the Man Utd slating. As does Lingard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Langston

Langston

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Dan LCFC said:

Sorry, I just don't really get the fuss with him. I agree he can definitely get better but I've never understood this almost unanimous feeling that he's better than Vardy. Where is the evidence?

 

Perhaps the fact he's 21 could factor into your thinking? MAD ISNT IT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...