AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 2 minutes ago, adamlcfcbevo85 said: you lose a loyalty bonus if you put a transfer request in it does not matter if you withdraw it because that's breaking the condition of a loyalty bonus putting one in, in the first place. So he lost that last year anyway. If Mahrez gets a loyalty bonus then I dont know what Vardy should get... loyalty daily blow and rim job? 1
Guest Markyblue Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 24 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said: he is worth 60m all day long, would be an even better player for a club like Man City and the space he will have, would be class if we could keep him for one more season but highly unlikely. Please no this has to be resolved now for the best interests of mahrez and city time to end this saga which is becoming tedious .
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 2 minutes ago, adamlcfcbevo85 said: you lose a loyalty bonus if you put a transfer request in it does not matter if you withdraw it because that's breaking the condition of a loyalty bonus putting one in, in the first place. So he lost that last year anyway. If and big if that is the case buddy then fair enough he wouldn’t deserve it anyway. Great player but he hasn’t covered himself in glory how he has acted regarding all this anyway hope he gets his move and we get proper money for him to reinvest
Collymore Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 3 minutes ago, foxes21 said: Without Roberts included in the deal it feels like we’re getting ripped off. What deal?
FrankieADZ Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 hopefully if any deal with Man City goes ahead its £60mil upfront with 10/15mil of add ons and Roberts included in the deal too
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 3 minutes ago, Collymore said: What deal? Rumoured to be £60 million down payment going up to £75 million with add ons re title win and champions league win and that sort of stuff
Ted Maul Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 9 minutes ago, foxes21 said: Without Roberts included in the deal it feels like we’re getting ripped off. £75m is far better than £50m plus Roberts. 2
foxes21 Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 32 minutes ago, Ted Maul said: £75m is far better than £50m plus Roberts. Oh i didn’t realise it’s 75m, that’s probably fair tbh. That price is including add-ons I’m guessing?
Ted Maul Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 1 minute ago, foxes21 said: Oh i didn’t realise it’s 75m, that’s probably fair tbh. That price is including add-ons I’m guessing? Yeah £60m up front with £15m in add-ons, presumably for appearances, PL title wins (probable) and CL wins (possible). I'd guess we will get at least £70m in the end, which isn't too bad.
RowlattsFox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 How was the iheanacho deal structured? I know there was a buy back clause but i imagine we can use this deal to wipe any future payments.
FoxinNotts Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 1 minute ago, RowlattsFox said: How was the iheanacho deal structured? I know there was a buy back clause but i imagine we can use this deal to wipe any future payments. Deals are subjective against players and agents, not between club and club. One deal rarely (if ever) has any bearing on another.
ian_marshall Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 (edited) I'd be very disappointed if we agree to include an add on for CL success. Whilst City are a good side, I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that they'll ever win the CL. The European super powers are equally as good and we've seen many PL teams go out in the group stages or the early rounds of the knockout phase over the year's. We could be really screwing ourselves over if we're not careful. Let's not kid ourselves Man City have the money so they need to stop messing us around and stump up the cash if they genuinely want Mahrez, otherwise they can buy a lesser player who fits their budget. Edited 24 May 2018 by ian_marshall
StanSP Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 14 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said: How was the iheanacho deal structured? I know there was a buy back clause but i imagine we can use this deal to wipe any future payments. Iheanacho's deal will not and never will have a bearing on another players transfer between either club. There's no way this deal can be used to wipe other future payments
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 6 minutes ago, StanSP said: Iheanacho's deal will not and never will have a bearing on another players transfer between either club. There's no way this deal can be used to wipe other future payments Have you heard anymore news about this potential deal @StanSP ?
StanSP Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 13 minutes ago, Bob Weasel Fox said: Have you heard anymore news about this potential deal @StanSP ? Nope 1
AKCJ Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 24 minutes ago, StanSP said: Iheanacho's deal will not and never will have a bearing on another players transfer between either club. There's no way this deal can be used to wipe other future payments Why is that funny Stan? Would it not be possible to have something like 60m for Mahrez and the buy back clause for Iheanacho revoked? Not having a go, genuinely curious.
splinterdream Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 1 minute ago, AKCJ said: Why is that funny Stan? Would it not be possible to have something like 60m for Mahrez and the buy back clause for Iheanacho revoked? Not having a go, genuinely curious. Agreed, the buy back clause is surely set by the club, they could have a counter agreement to never act on the previous clause
FoxyPalace.com Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 Best Deal would be £60 up front with £15 Million in addon-ons. Also guaranteed loan of Roberts for 2 years with £15 Million fee agreed before hand.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 20 minutes ago, StanSP said: Nope Bless you. Will be sorted when it’s sorted im just worried about @SheppyFox mainly although he is mainly worrying about the current quota of incoming signings (or lack of) 1
mozartfox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 31 minutes ago, Bob Weasel Fox said: Bless you. Will be sorted when it’s sorted im just worried about @SheppyFox mainly although he is mainly worrying about the current quota of incoming signings (or lack of) Sheps is under suicide watch, so relax. 4
Gerard Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 11 hours ago, HankMarvin said: Hazard 33 goals 19 assists 7595 mins Mahrez 35 goals 27 assists 8810 mins Works out Mahrez has played an extra 13 and half games of football time wise And in those 13.5 extra games Mahrez scored 2 goals and assisted 8 goals. The sort of stats that Ozil would get in a good season. All whilst playing with inferior players in a side that had low possession stats and playing RM in a 4-4-2 with defensive responsibilities. Hazard plays as a false 9 in a high possession team with better players and is rated at £150m. You would think statistically he should be blowing Mahrez away with all those advantages but he doesn't.
Gerard Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 11 hours ago, Wizerud said: I’d rather we sold him to Roma for 50m than Man City for 75. As for Shaqiri, after what he said about his fellow Stoke teammates being shit (even though he was right) I wouldn’t want him either. Not a chance. Man City are not our competition. I'd rather have the extra £25m. 1
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 24 May 2018 Posted 24 May 2018 2 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Oh no He suits that shade of blue . . . . 1
Recommended Posts